Evaluation of a scoring system to assess proficiency in cerebral angiography for neuroendovascular surgery education.
Attention
Cerebral angiography
Education
Preparation
Scoring
Skill
Journal
Heliyon
ISSN: 2405-8440
Titre abrégé: Heliyon
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101672560
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Feb 2023
Feb 2023
Historique:
received:
25
09
2022
revised:
26
11
2022
accepted:
23
01
2023
entrez:
9
2
2023
pubmed:
10
2
2023
medline:
10
2
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Cerebral angiography is indispensable for endovascular neurosurgeons. However, there is no established system to evaluate the competency of trainees. We established a scoring system and statistically analyzed its characteristics. Endovascular neurosurgeons scored the operators of 177 cerebral angiography based on ten evaluation items. Preoperative explanation, device selection, and device assembly were classified as "preparation," communication with the patient, radiation protection and angiography system as "attention," and catheter operation, blood loss, procedure completion, and sheath insertion as "skill". The sum of the scores were compared using the Mann-Whitney test according to the status of the operator (trainee (TR), neurosurgeon (NS), or endovascular neurosurgeon (EVNS)). The highest average for each item was 0.89 for communication, and the lowest was 0.68 for catheter operation. The mean ± standard deviation of the total score was 7.82 ± 2.02, and scores by status were 7.08 ± 2.12 for TR, 8.32 ± 1.35 for NS, and 9.33 ± 1.20 for EVNS with significant differences among each status (p < 0.05). The sum scores of the preparation, attention, and skill sections also showed significant differences between each status except between NS and EVNS in the preparation section and TR and NS in the skill section (p < 0.05). There were significant differences in the total score between statuses, suggesting that the scoring system may be an indicator of proficiency in cerebral angiography. It was suggested that dividing each item into preparation, attention, and skill sections may indicate the characteristics of proficiency.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36755597
doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e13249
pii: S2405-8440(23)00456-5
pmc: PMC9900261
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
e13249Informations de copyright
© 2023 The Authors.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare no competing interests.
Références
Neurosurgery. 2013 Oct;73 Suppl 1:46-50
pubmed: 24051882
World Neurosurg. 2021 Nov;155:e369-e381
pubmed: 34419656
Cureus. 2016 Aug 29;8(8):e756
pubmed: 27733961
Neurosurg Focus. 2020 Mar 1;48(3):E6
pubmed: 32114562
AEM Educ Train. 2021 Aug 01;5(4):e10629
pubmed: 34485802
PLoS One. 2020 Sep 17;15(9):e0238952
pubmed: 32941466
Ann ICRP. 2017 Oct;46(1):1-144
pubmed: 29065694
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2020 Oct;162(10):2313-2321
pubmed: 32780255
J Endovasc Ther. 2006 Apr;13(2):237-43
pubmed: 16643079
Neurology. 2005 Jan 25;64(2):190-8
pubmed: 15668413
J Med Educ Curric Dev. 2020 Apr 13;7:2382120520912744
pubmed: 32313840
World Neurosurg. 2016 Jun;90:397-402
pubmed: 27001239
J Neurointerv Surg. 2012 Nov;4(6):438-41
pubmed: 22015637
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2016 Nov;158(11):2085-2088
pubmed: 27631972
J Neuroradiol. 2013 Dec;40(5):342-7
pubmed: 23827385
J Neurosurg. 2014 Aug;121(2):228-46
pubmed: 24949680
J Neurosurg. 2021 Dec 31;:1-10
pubmed: 34972086
Stroke. 1987 Nov-Dec;18(6):997-1004
pubmed: 3686597
Br J Surg. 1997 Feb;84(2):273-8
pubmed: 9052454
Neurosurg Focus. 2020 Mar 1;48(3):E7
pubmed: 32114563
Br J Neurosurg. 2022 Jan 11;:1-5
pubmed: 35015601