The process of replication target selection in psychology: what to consider?
consensus
replication
study selection
Journal
Royal Society open science
ISSN: 2054-5703
Titre abrégé: R Soc Open Sci
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101647528
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Feb 2023
Feb 2023
Historique:
received:
07
04
2021
accepted:
13
01
2023
entrez:
9
2
2023
pubmed:
10
2
2023
medline:
10
2
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Increased execution of replication studies contributes to the effort to restore credibility of empirical research. However, a second generation of problems arises: the number of potential replication targets is at a serious mismatch with available resources. Given limited resources, replication target selection should be well-justified, systematic and transparently communicated. At present the discussion on what to consider when selecting a replication target is limited to theoretical discussion, self-reported justifications and a few formalized suggestions. In this Registered Report, we proposed a study involving the scientific community to create a list of considerations for consultation when selecting a replication target in psychology. We employed a modified Delphi approach. First, we constructed a preliminary list of considerations. Second, we surveyed psychologists who previously selected a replication target with regards to their considerations. Third, we incorporated the results into the preliminary list of considerations and sent the updated list to a group of individuals knowledgeable about concerns regarding replication target selection. Over the course of several rounds, we established consensus regarding what to consider when selecting a replication target. The resulting checklist can be used for transparently communicating the rationale for selecting studies for replication.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36756069
doi: 10.1098/rsos.210586
pii: rsos210586
pmc: PMC9890109
doi:
Banques de données
figshare
['10.6084/m9.figshare.c.6403449']
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
210586Informations de copyright
© 2023 The Authors.
Références
Science. 2015 Aug 28;349(6251):aac4716
pubmed: 26315443
Health Technol Assess. 1998;2(3):i-iv, 1-88
pubmed: 9561895
Acad Med. 2016 May;91(5):663-8
pubmed: 26796090
PLoS Med. 2005 Aug;2(8):e124
pubmed: 16060722
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2017 May;12(3):527-542
pubmed: 28475467
Behav Brain Sci. 2018 Jan;41:e157
pubmed: 31064530
BMC Psychol. 2016 Jun 01;4(1):30
pubmed: 27251381
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2012 Nov;7(6):537-42
pubmed: 26168110
Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2015 Oct;49(10):887-97
pubmed: 26296368
Behav Brain Sci. 2018 Jan;41:e139
pubmed: 31064529
Elife. 2014 Dec 10;3:
pubmed: 25490932
Nat Hum Behav. 2020 Jan;4(1):4-6
pubmed: 31792401
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2016 Dec;145(12):e81-e95
pubmed: 27935731
R Soc Open Sci. 2020 Apr 1;7(4):181351
pubmed: 32431853
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2014 Oct;143(5):1794-805
pubmed: 24933517
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2012 Nov;7(6):657-60
pubmed: 26168127
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2012 Nov;7(6):632-8
pubmed: 26168122
J Adv Nurs. 1994 Jun;19(6):1221-5
pubmed: 7930104
PLoS One. 2020 Jul 22;15(7):e0235905
pubmed: 32697809
Neurotherapeutics. 2017 Jul;14(3):537-545
pubmed: 28653278
PLoS One. 2015 Aug 13;10(8):e0135162
pubmed: 26270647
J Clin Epidemiol. 2019 Apr;108:110-120
pubmed: 30557677
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2011 Mar;6(2):163-71
pubmed: 26162135
R Soc Open Sci. 2021 May 19;8(5):201697
pubmed: 34017596
Psychol Sci. 2011 Nov;22(11):1359-66
pubmed: 22006061
Behav Brain Sci. 2018 Jan;41:e124
pubmed: 31064512
Sports Med. 2023 Jan;53(1):281-291
pubmed: 36066754
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2012 Nov;7(6):528-30
pubmed: 26168108
Psychol Methods. 2021 Dec 20;:
pubmed: 34928679
Behav Brain Sci. 2017 Oct 25;41:e120
pubmed: 29065933
Behav Brain Sci. 2018 Jan;41:e132
pubmed: 31064517
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2017 Aug;113(2):254-261
pubmed: 28714731