Identification of biomarkers to stratify response to B-cell-targeted therapies in systemic lupus erythematosus: an exploratory analysis of a randomised controlled trial.
Journal
The Lancet. Rheumatology
ISSN: 2665-9913
Titre abrégé: Lancet Rheumatol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101765308
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jan 2023
Jan 2023
Historique:
entrez:
9
2
2023
pubmed:
10
2
2023
medline:
10
2
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a complex autoimmune disease associated with widespread immune dysregulation and diverse clinical features. Immune abnormalities might be differentially associated with specific organ involvement or response to targeted therapies. We aimed to identify biomarkers of response to belimumab after rituximab to facilitate a personalised approach to therapy. In this exploratory analysis of a randomised controlled trial (BEAT-LUPUS), we investigated immune profiles of patients with SLE recruited to the 52-week clinical trial, which tested the combination of rituximab plus belimumab versus rituximab plus placebo. We used machine learning and conventional statistics to investigate relevant laboratory and clinical biomarkers associated with major clinical response. BEAT LUPUS is registered at ISRCTN, 47873003, and is now complete. Between Feb 2, 2017, and March 28, 2019, 52 patients were recruited to BEAT-LUPUS, of whom 44 provided clinical data at week 52 and were included in this analysis. 21 (48%) of 44 participants were in the belimumab group (mean age 39·5 years [SD 12·1]; 17 [81%] were female, four [19%] were male, 13 [62%] were White) and 23 (52%) were in the placebo group (mean age 42·1 years [SD 10·5]; 21 [91%] were female, two [9%] were male, 16 [70%] were White). Ten (48%) of 21 participants who received belimumab after rituximab and eight (35%) of 23 who received placebo after rituximab had a major clinical response at 52 weeks (between-group difference of 13% [95% CI -15 to 38]). We found a predictive association between baseline serum IgA2 anti-double stranded DNA (dsDNA) antibody concentrations and clinical response to belimumab after rituximab, with a between-group difference in major clinical response of 48% (95% CI 10 to 70) in patients with elevated baseline serum IgA2 anti-dsDNA antibody concentrations. Moreover, among those who had a major clinical response, serum IgA2 anti-dsDNA antibody concentrations significantly decreased from baseline only in the belimumab group. Increased circulating IgA2 (but not total) plasmablast numbers, and T follicular helper cell numbers predicted clinical response and were both reduced only in patients who responded to belimumab after rituximab. Serum IgA2 anti-dsDNA antibody concentrations were also associated with active renal disease, whereas serum IgA1 anti-dsDNA antibody and IFN-α concentrations were associated with mucocutaneous disease activity but did not predict response to B-cell targeted therapy. Patients with a high baseline serum interleukin-6 concentration were less likely to have a major clinical response, irrespective of therapy. This exploratory study revealed the presence of distinct molecular networks associated with renal and mucocutaneous involvement, and response to B-cell-targeted therapies, which, if confirmed, could guide precision targeting of advanced therapies for this heterogenous disease. Versus Arthritis, UCLH Biomedical Research Centre, LUPUS UK, and GSK.
Sections du résumé
Background
UNASSIGNED
Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a complex autoimmune disease associated with widespread immune dysregulation and diverse clinical features. Immune abnormalities might be differentially associated with specific organ involvement or response to targeted therapies. We aimed to identify biomarkers of response to belimumab after rituximab to facilitate a personalised approach to therapy.
Methods
UNASSIGNED
In this exploratory analysis of a randomised controlled trial (BEAT-LUPUS), we investigated immune profiles of patients with SLE recruited to the 52-week clinical trial, which tested the combination of rituximab plus belimumab versus rituximab plus placebo. We used machine learning and conventional statistics to investigate relevant laboratory and clinical biomarkers associated with major clinical response. BEAT LUPUS is registered at ISRCTN, 47873003, and is now complete.
Findings
UNASSIGNED
Between Feb 2, 2017, and March 28, 2019, 52 patients were recruited to BEAT-LUPUS, of whom 44 provided clinical data at week 52 and were included in this analysis. 21 (48%) of 44 participants were in the belimumab group (mean age 39·5 years [SD 12·1]; 17 [81%] were female, four [19%] were male, 13 [62%] were White) and 23 (52%) were in the placebo group (mean age 42·1 years [SD 10·5]; 21 [91%] were female, two [9%] were male, 16 [70%] were White). Ten (48%) of 21 participants who received belimumab after rituximab and eight (35%) of 23 who received placebo after rituximab had a major clinical response at 52 weeks (between-group difference of 13% [95% CI -15 to 38]). We found a predictive association between baseline serum IgA2 anti-double stranded DNA (dsDNA) antibody concentrations and clinical response to belimumab after rituximab, with a between-group difference in major clinical response of 48% (95% CI 10 to 70) in patients with elevated baseline serum IgA2 anti-dsDNA antibody concentrations. Moreover, among those who had a major clinical response, serum IgA2 anti-dsDNA antibody concentrations significantly decreased from baseline only in the belimumab group. Increased circulating IgA2 (but not total) plasmablast numbers, and T follicular helper cell numbers predicted clinical response and were both reduced only in patients who responded to belimumab after rituximab. Serum IgA2 anti-dsDNA antibody concentrations were also associated with active renal disease, whereas serum IgA1 anti-dsDNA antibody and IFN-α concentrations were associated with mucocutaneous disease activity but did not predict response to B-cell targeted therapy. Patients with a high baseline serum interleukin-6 concentration were less likely to have a major clinical response, irrespective of therapy.
Interpretation
UNASSIGNED
This exploratory study revealed the presence of distinct molecular networks associated with renal and mucocutaneous involvement, and response to B-cell-targeted therapies, which, if confirmed, could guide precision targeting of advanced therapies for this heterogenous disease.
Funding
UNASSIGNED
Versus Arthritis, UCLH Biomedical Research Centre, LUPUS UK, and GSK.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36756239
doi: 10.1016/S2665-9913(22)00332-0
pii: S2665-9913(22)00332-0
pmc: PMC9894756
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
e24-e35Subventions
Organisme : Versus Arthritis
ID : 21286
Pays : United Kingdom
Informations de copyright
© 2023 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY 4.0 license.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
MS and MRE are named on a patent pending (IgA2 anti-dsDNA antibodies as a biomarker in SLE, the patent is to University College London). MRE has received grant support from GSK, VersusArthritis, National Institute of Health and Care Research (NIHR), UK Medical Research Council (MRC), and Lupus UK, on behalf of his coauthors, which funded the research. MRE and CG have been members of the speakers’ bureau for GSK and have received consultancy fees for attending GSK advisory boards. DAI has received consultancy fees from AstraZeneca, Eli Lilly, Merck Serono, Servier. CG also reports personal fees for honoraria from consultancy work from the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, AbbVie, Amgen, AstraZeneca, EMD Serono, MGP, Sanofi, and UCB; personal fees for a speakers’ bureau from UCB; and an educational grant from UCB to Sandwell and West Birmingham Hospitals NHS Trust that supported her research work. All other authors declare no competing interests.
Références
J Exp Med. 2020 Mar 2;217(3):
pubmed: 31891367
Ann Rheum Dis. 2011 Jan;70(1):54-9
pubmed: 20833737
Arthritis Rheumatol. 2017 Oct;69(10):2018-2028
pubmed: 28622453
Lupus Sci Med. 2022 May;9(1):
pubmed: 35640982
J Exp Med. 2012 Jul 2;209(7):1335-48
pubmed: 22689824
J Clin Invest. 2021 Jun 15;131(12):
pubmed: 34128474
Rheumatol Int. 1998;18(2):63-9
pubmed: 9782535
Arthritis Rheum. 2011 Dec;63(12):3918-30
pubmed: 22127708
Eur J Immunol. 2018 Feb;48(2):283-292
pubmed: 28921509
RMD Open. 2020 Jul;6(2):
pubmed: 32723832
Int J Mol Sci. 2020 May 14;21(10):
pubmed: 32422945
Ann Rheum Dis. 2012 Aug;71(8):1343-9
pubmed: 22337213
J Clin Invest. 2011 Oct;121(10):3991-4002
pubmed: 21881212
Arthritis Rheum. 2013 Oct;65(10):2672-9
pubmed: 23839909
BMJ Open. 2019 Dec 16;9(12):e032569
pubmed: 31848169
Nat Commun. 2020 Jan 8;11(1):120
pubmed: 31913287
Lupus. 2015 Aug;24(9):909-17
pubmed: 25654980
Arthritis Rheumatol. 2014 Nov;66(11):2938-46
pubmed: 25080282
PLoS One. 2013 Aug 12;8(8):e71458
pubmed: 23951169
Brief Bioinform. 2019 Mar 22;20(2):492-503
pubmed: 29045534
Genome Biol. 2016 Apr 01;17:62
pubmed: 27039378
Ann Rheum Dis. 2014 May;73(5):909-12
pubmed: 24385201
Arthritis Res Ther. 2019 Apr 29;21(1):107
pubmed: 31036046
Sci Rep. 2018 Apr 11;8(1):5793
pubmed: 29643425
Immunity. 2007 Jun;26(6):812-26
pubmed: 17570691
Ann Intern Med. 2021 Dec;174(12):1647-1657
pubmed: 34698499
Clin Vaccine Immunol. 2010 Mar;17(3):393-401
pubmed: 20089794
J Autoimmun. 2018 Jul;91:45-54
pubmed: 29636274
Cell. 2016 Apr 21;165(3):551-65
pubmed: 27040498
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2010 Sep;49(9):1665-9
pubmed: 20181671