Simultaneous Highly Efficient Contrast-Free Lumen and Vessel Wall MR Imaging for Anatomical Assessment of Aortic Disease.
aortic MR angiography
multicontrast imaging
vessel wall imaging
Journal
Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI
ISSN: 1522-2586
Titre abrégé: J Magn Reson Imaging
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9105850
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
10 2023
10 2023
Historique:
revised:
24
12
2022
received:
20
09
2022
accepted:
27
12
2022
medline:
18
9
2023
pubmed:
10
2
2023
entrez:
9
2
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Bright-blood lumen and black-blood vessel wall imaging are required for the comprehensive assessment of aortic disease. These images are usually acquired separately, resulting in long examinations and potential misregistration between images. To characterize the performance of an accelerated and respiratory motion-compensated three-dimensional (3D) cardiac MRI technique for simultaneous contrast-free aortic lumen and vessel wall imaging with an interleaved T2 and inversion recovery prepared sequence (iT2Prep-BOOST). Prospective. A total of 30 consecutive patients with aortopathy referred for a clinically indicated cardiac MRI examination (9 females, mean age ± standard deviation: 32 ± 12 years). 1.5-T; bright-blood MR angiography (diaphragmatic navigator-gated T2-prepared 3D balanced steady-state free precession [bSSFP], T2Prep-bSSFP), breath-held black-blood two-dimensional (2D) half acquisition single-shot turbo spin echo (HASTE), and 3D bSSFP iT2Prep-BOOST. iT2Prep-BOOST bright-blood images were compared to T2prep-bSSFP images in terms of aortic vessel dimensions, lumen-to-myocardium contrast ratio (CR), and image quality (diagnostic confidence, vessel sharpness and presence of artifacts, assessed by three cardiologists on a 4-point scale, 1: nondiagnostic to 4: excellent). The iT2Prep-BOOST black-blood images were compared to 2D HASTE images for quantification of wall thickness. A visual comparison between computed tomography (CT) and iT2Prep-BOOST was performed in a patient with chronic aortic dissection. Paired t-tests, Wilcoxon signed-rank tests, intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), Bland-Altman analysis. A P value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Bright-blood iT2Prep-BOOST resulted in significantly improved image quality (mean ± standard deviation 3.8 ± 0.5 vs. 3.3 ± 0.8) and CR (2.9 ± 0.8 vs. 1.8 ± 0.5) compared with T2Prep-bSSFP, with a shorter scan time (7.8 ± 1.7 minutes vs. 12.9 ± 3.4 minutes) while providing a complementary 3D black-blood image. Aortic lumen diameter and vessel wall thickness measurements in bright-blood and black-blood images were in good agreement with T2Prep-bSSFP and HASTE images (<0.02 cm and <0.005 cm bias, respectively) and good intrareader (ICC > 0.96) and interreader (ICC > 0.94) agreement was observed for all measurements. iT2Prep-BOOST might enable time-efficient simultaneous bright- and black-blood aortic imaging, with improved image quality compared to T2Prep-bSSFP and HASTE imaging, and comparable measurements for aortic wall and lumen dimensions. 2. Stage 2.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Bright-blood lumen and black-blood vessel wall imaging are required for the comprehensive assessment of aortic disease. These images are usually acquired separately, resulting in long examinations and potential misregistration between images.
PURPOSE
To characterize the performance of an accelerated and respiratory motion-compensated three-dimensional (3D) cardiac MRI technique for simultaneous contrast-free aortic lumen and vessel wall imaging with an interleaved T2 and inversion recovery prepared sequence (iT2Prep-BOOST).
STUDY TYPE
Prospective.
POPULATION
A total of 30 consecutive patients with aortopathy referred for a clinically indicated cardiac MRI examination (9 females, mean age ± standard deviation: 32 ± 12 years).
FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE
1.5-T; bright-blood MR angiography (diaphragmatic navigator-gated T2-prepared 3D balanced steady-state free precession [bSSFP], T2Prep-bSSFP), breath-held black-blood two-dimensional (2D) half acquisition single-shot turbo spin echo (HASTE), and 3D bSSFP iT2Prep-BOOST.
ASSESSMENT
iT2Prep-BOOST bright-blood images were compared to T2prep-bSSFP images in terms of aortic vessel dimensions, lumen-to-myocardium contrast ratio (CR), and image quality (diagnostic confidence, vessel sharpness and presence of artifacts, assessed by three cardiologists on a 4-point scale, 1: nondiagnostic to 4: excellent). The iT2Prep-BOOST black-blood images were compared to 2D HASTE images for quantification of wall thickness. A visual comparison between computed tomography (CT) and iT2Prep-BOOST was performed in a patient with chronic aortic dissection.
STATISTICAL TESTS
Paired t-tests, Wilcoxon signed-rank tests, intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), Bland-Altman analysis. A P value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
RESULTS
Bright-blood iT2Prep-BOOST resulted in significantly improved image quality (mean ± standard deviation 3.8 ± 0.5 vs. 3.3 ± 0.8) and CR (2.9 ± 0.8 vs. 1.8 ± 0.5) compared with T2Prep-bSSFP, with a shorter scan time (7.8 ± 1.7 minutes vs. 12.9 ± 3.4 minutes) while providing a complementary 3D black-blood image. Aortic lumen diameter and vessel wall thickness measurements in bright-blood and black-blood images were in good agreement with T2Prep-bSSFP and HASTE images (<0.02 cm and <0.005 cm bias, respectively) and good intrareader (ICC > 0.96) and interreader (ICC > 0.94) agreement was observed for all measurements.
DATA CONCLUSION
iT2Prep-BOOST might enable time-efficient simultaneous bright- and black-blood aortic imaging, with improved image quality compared to T2Prep-bSSFP and HASTE imaging, and comparable measurements for aortic wall and lumen dimensions.
EVIDENCE LEVEL
2.
TECHNICAL EFFICACY
Stage 2.
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1110-1122Subventions
Organisme : Wellcome Trust
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : British Heart Foundation
ID : RG/20/1/34802
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : British Heart Foundation
ID : PG/18/59/33955
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : British Heart Foundation
ID : FS/20/13/34857
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Department of Health
Pays : United Kingdom
Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Informations de copyright
© 2023 The Authors. Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine.
Références
Eur Radiol Exp. 2019 Jul 31;3(1):29
pubmed: 31363865
J Vasc Surg. 2015 Apr;61(4):1034-40
pubmed: 24388698
Magn Reson Imaging. 2016 Jan;34(1):18-25
pubmed: 26471514
Magn Reson Med. 2022 Aug;88(2):617-632
pubmed: 35436368
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2022 Jan 10;24(1):5
pubmed: 35000609
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010 Apr 6;55(14):e27-e129
pubmed: 20359588
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2021 Feb 8;23(1):7
pubmed: 33557887
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2016 Apr 14;18:20
pubmed: 27075677
Magn Reson Med. 2019 Jul;82(1):312-325
pubmed: 30896049
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2021 Jul 19;23(1):91
pubmed: 34275486
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2010 Feb;31(2):502-9
pubmed: 20099365
Magn Reson Med. 2019 Jun;81(6):3705-3719
pubmed: 30834594
Eur Radiol. 2016 Apr;26(4):951-8
pubmed: 26188657
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2009 Mar;29(3):576-82
pubmed: 19243039
Am J Cardiol. 2012 Jul 1;110(1):50-6
pubmed: 22459304
Magn Reson Imaging. 2022 Apr;87:169-176
pubmed: 34999163
Magn Reson Imaging. 2019 Nov;63:137-146
pubmed: 31425807
Circulation. 2013 Sep 10;128(11 Suppl 1):S157-62
pubmed: 24030401
Eur J Radiol. 2021 Apr;137:109573
pubmed: 33578090
Magn Reson Med. 2005 Nov;54(5):1273-80
pubmed: 16155887
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2014 Jun;15(6):651-8
pubmed: 24399340
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2022 Jan;55(1):61-80
pubmed: 33078512
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2015 Mar;41(3):738-46
pubmed: 24573992
Magn Reson Med. 2012 Nov;68(5):1423-38
pubmed: 22246917
Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2022 Mar;15(3):e000075
pubmed: 35172599
Magn Reson Med. 2020 Nov;84(5):2376-2388
pubmed: 32301164
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2007;9(1):33-42
pubmed: 17178678
Eur Heart J. 2005 Mar;26(6):617-22
pubmed: 15618050
Magn Reson Med. 2019 Jan;81(1):102-115
pubmed: 30058252
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2019 Oct 28;21(1):66
pubmed: 31660983
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2020 Feb 24;22(1):17
pubmed: 32089132
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2011 Nov 17;13:71
pubmed: 22087579
Magn Reson Med. 2017 May;77(5):1894-1908
pubmed: 27221073
Eur Heart J. 2014 Nov 1;35(41):2873-926
pubmed: 25173340
Magn Reson Med. 2012 Feb;67(2):437-45
pubmed: 21656563
Magn Reson Imaging. 2021 Feb;76:123-130
pubmed: 33309920
Acad Radiol. 2013 Aug;20(8):1004-8
pubmed: 23830606
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2009 Apr 24;11:10
pubmed: 19393089