Severe and mild-moderate SARS-CoV-2 vaccinated patients show different frequencies of IFNγ-releasing cells: An exploratory study.
Journal
PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Titre abrégé: PLoS One
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101285081
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2023
2023
Historique:
received:
18
08
2022
accepted:
23
01
2023
entrez:
9
2
2023
pubmed:
10
2
2023
medline:
14
2
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Despite an apparent effective vaccination, some patients are admitted to the hospital after SARS-CoV-2 infection. The role of adaptive immunity in COVID-19 is growing; nonetheless, differences in the spike-specific immune responses between patients requiring or not hospitalization for SARS-CoV-2 infection remains to be evaluated. In this study, we aim to evaluate the spike-specific immune response in patients with mild-moderate or severeSARS-CoV-2 infection, after breakthrough infection following two doses of BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine. We included three cohorts of 15 cases which received the two BNT162b2 vaccine doses in previous 4 to 7 months: 1) patients with severe COVID-19; 2) patients with mild-moderate COVID-19 and 3) vaccinated individuals with a negative SARS-CoV-2 molecular pharyngeal swab (healthy subjects). Anti-S1 and anti-S2 specific SARS-CoV-2 IgM and IgG titers were measured through a chemiluminescence immunoassay technology. In addition, the frequencies of IFNγ-releasing cells were measured by ELISpot. The spike-specific IFNγ-releasing cells were significantly lower in severe patients (8 [0; 26] s.f.c.×106), as compared to mild-moderate patients (135 [64; 159] s.f.c.×106; p<0.001) and healthy subjects (103 [50; 188] s.f.c.×106; p<0.001). The anti-Spike protein IgG levels were similar among the three cohorts of cases (p = 0.098). All cases had an IgM titer below the analytic sensitivity of the test. The Receiver Operating Curve analysis indicated the rate of spike-specific IFNγ-releasing cells can discriminate correctly severe COVID-19 and mild-moderate patients (AUC: 0.9289; 95%CI: 0.8376-1.000; p< 0.0001), with a diagnostic specificity of 100% for s.f.c. > 81.2 x 106. 2-doses vaccinated patients requiring hospitalization for severe COVID-19 show a cellular-mediated immune response lower than mild-moderate or healthy subjects, despite similar antibody titers.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Despite an apparent effective vaccination, some patients are admitted to the hospital after SARS-CoV-2 infection. The role of adaptive immunity in COVID-19 is growing; nonetheless, differences in the spike-specific immune responses between patients requiring or not hospitalization for SARS-CoV-2 infection remains to be evaluated. In this study, we aim to evaluate the spike-specific immune response in patients with mild-moderate or severeSARS-CoV-2 infection, after breakthrough infection following two doses of BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine.
METHODS
We included three cohorts of 15 cases which received the two BNT162b2 vaccine doses in previous 4 to 7 months: 1) patients with severe COVID-19; 2) patients with mild-moderate COVID-19 and 3) vaccinated individuals with a negative SARS-CoV-2 molecular pharyngeal swab (healthy subjects). Anti-S1 and anti-S2 specific SARS-CoV-2 IgM and IgG titers were measured through a chemiluminescence immunoassay technology. In addition, the frequencies of IFNγ-releasing cells were measured by ELISpot.
RESULTS
The spike-specific IFNγ-releasing cells were significantly lower in severe patients (8 [0; 26] s.f.c.×106), as compared to mild-moderate patients (135 [64; 159] s.f.c.×106; p<0.001) and healthy subjects (103 [50; 188] s.f.c.×106; p<0.001). The anti-Spike protein IgG levels were similar among the three cohorts of cases (p = 0.098). All cases had an IgM titer below the analytic sensitivity of the test. The Receiver Operating Curve analysis indicated the rate of spike-specific IFNγ-releasing cells can discriminate correctly severe COVID-19 and mild-moderate patients (AUC: 0.9289; 95%CI: 0.8376-1.000; p< 0.0001), with a diagnostic specificity of 100% for s.f.c. > 81.2 x 106.
CONCLUSIONS
2-doses vaccinated patients requiring hospitalization for severe COVID-19 show a cellular-mediated immune response lower than mild-moderate or healthy subjects, despite similar antibody titers.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36757971
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0281444
pii: PONE-D-22-23169
pmc: PMC9910754
doi:
Substances chimiques
BNT162 Vaccine
0
Interferon-gamma
82115-62-6
Antibodies, Viral
0
Immunoglobulin M
0
Immunoglobulin G
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e0281444Informations de copyright
Copyright: © 2023 Garofalo et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
There are no conflicts of interest related to the present work. Dr. Longhini contributed to the development of a new device not discussed in the present study (European Patent number 3320941 released on 5th August 2020) and he is designed as inventor. He also received speaking fees from Intersurgical, Draeger and Fisher & Paykel. The remaining authors have no conflict of interest to disclose.
Références
Cell. 2020 Nov 12;183(4):996-1012.e19
pubmed: 33010815
Cell Rep. 2021 Feb 9;34(6):108728
pubmed: 33516277
Rev Recent Clin Trials. 2021;16(2):216-219
pubmed: 33069200
PLoS One. 2022 May 10;17(5):e0268050
pubmed: 35536849
Emerg Infect Dis. 2021 Jan;27(1):
pubmed: 33058753
World J Emerg Surg. 2020 Jul 2;15(1):43
pubmed: 32615987
N Engl J Med. 2020 Dec 31;383(27):2603-2615
pubmed: 33301246
Lancet Respir Med. 2020 Apr;8(4):420-422
pubmed: 32085846
Front Immunol. 2022 Oct 10;13:1001198
pubmed: 36300105
JAMA. 2020 Apr 28;323(16):1574-1581
pubmed: 32250385
Cell Rep Med. 2022 Mar 04;3(3):100557
pubmed: 35474751
Vaccines (Basel). 2022 Jan 18;10(2):
pubmed: 35214600
Cell. 2020 Oct 1;183(1):158-168.e14
pubmed: 32979941
Immunol Rev. 2022 Sep;310(1):27-46
pubmed: 35733376
Cell. 2020 Jun 25;181(7):1489-1501.e15
pubmed: 32473127
N Engl J Med. 2021 Aug 12;385(7):661-662
pubmed: 34161700
BMJ. 2022 Jul 20;378:e071249
pubmed: 35858698
Nat Immunol. 2022 Feb;23(2):186-193
pubmed: 35105982
Vaccines (Basel). 2021 Aug 25;9(9):
pubmed: 34579184
Clin Chem Lab Med. 2021 Mar 15;59(8):1463-1467
pubmed: 33711225
Crit Care. 2022 Jun 8;26(1):170
pubmed: 35676693
J Exp Med. 2021 May 3;218(5):
pubmed: 33646265
Nature. 2020 Oct;586(7830):516-527
pubmed: 32967006
JAMA Neurol. 2020 Aug 1;77(8):1018-1027
pubmed: 32469387
Transl Res. 2020 Jun;220:1-13
pubmed: 32299776
Front Immunol. 2021 Nov 16;12:778679
pubmed: 34868051
Cell Mol Immunol. 2020 May;17(5):541-543
pubmed: 32203186
Cell Commun Signal. 2022 Jul 16;20(1):106
pubmed: 35842705
Front Immunol. 2021 Sep 28;12:740708
pubmed: 34650563
Nat Immunol. 2020 Nov;21(11):1336-1345
pubmed: 32887977
Immunity. 2020 Jun 16;52(6):971-977.e3
pubmed: 32413330