Depressive primary care patients' assessment of received collaborative care.
Journal
Scientific reports
ISSN: 2045-2322
Titre abrégé: Sci Rep
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101563288
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
09 02 2023
09 02 2023
Historique:
received:
30
04
2022
accepted:
02
02
2023
entrez:
9
2
2023
pubmed:
10
2
2023
medline:
14
2
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The "Patient Assessment of Chronic Illness Care" (PACIC) is a tool for evaluating outpatient health service for patients with chronic diseases. Our aim was to analyze the association between PACIC scores of primary care patients with depression and patients' or patients' general practitioners' (GPs) characteristics. In a data set including depressive primary care patients (N = 280) the association of patient characteristics (sex, age, depressive symptom severity, suicidal ideation) with PACIC scores were assessed by linear regression models. The association between GPs' characteristics (type, location of practice; age, qualification of practitioner) and PACIC scores was assessed by linear mixed models with individual practices as random effects. Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) scores at 12 months follow up and changes in PHQ-9 scores from baseline to follow up were significantly positive associated with higher PACIC scores (beta = 0.67, 95%-CI [0.02, 1.34]). PACIC scores were not associated with patients' sex (p = 0.473) or age (p = 0.531). GP's age was negatively associated with PACIC scores (p = 0.03). In conclusion, in patients with depression, the PACIC is independent from patients' and GPs' characteristics. The PACIC may be appropriate to assess patient-perspective on depression services in primary care.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36759622
doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-29339-9
pii: 10.1038/s41598-023-29339-9
pmc: PMC9911390
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
2329Informations de copyright
© 2023. The Author(s).
Références
Herrman, H. et al. Time for united action on depression: A Lancet-World Psychiatric Association Commission. Lancet 399(10328), 957–1022. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(21)02141-3 (2022).
doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)02141-3
pubmed: 35180424
Ferenchick, E. K., Ramanuj, P. & Pincus, H. A. Depression in primary care: Part 1—Screening and diagnosis. BMJ 365, 794 (2019).
doi: 10.1136/bmj.l794
Cuijpers, P. The patient perspective in research on major depression. BMC Psychiatry 11(1), 1–2 (2011).
doi: 10.1186/1471-244X-11-89
Wagner, E. H. et al. Improving chronic illness care: Translating evidence into action. Health Aff. (Millwood) 20(6), 64–78. https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.20.6.64 (2001).
doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.20.6.64
pubmed: 11816692
Von Korff, M., Gruman, J., Schaefer, J., Curry, S. J. & Wagner, E. H. Collaborative management of chronic illness. Ann. Intern. Med. 127(12), 1097–1102. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-127-12-199712150-00008 (1997).
doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-127-12-199712150-00008
Davy, C. et al. Effectiveness of chronic care models: Opportunities for improving healthcare practice and health outcomes: A systematic review. BMC Health Serv. Res. 15, 194. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-015-0854-8 (2015).
doi: 10.1186/s12913-015-0854-8
pubmed: 25958128
pmcid: 4448852
Coleman, K., Austin, B. T., Brach, C. & Wagner, E. H. Evidence on the chronic care model in the new millennium. Health Aff. (Millwood) 28(1), 75–85. https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.28.1.75 (2009).
doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.28.1.75
pubmed: 19124857
Gensichen, J. et al. Predictors and outcomes in primary depression care (POKAL)—A research training group develops an innovative approach to collaborative care. BMC Prim. Care 23(1), 309. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12875-022-01913-6 (2022).
doi: 10.1186/s12875-022-01913-6
pubmed: 36460965
pmcid: 9717547
Glasgow, R. E. et al. Development and validation of the patient assessment of chronic illness care (PACIC). Med. Care 43(5), 436–444. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.mlr.0000160375.47920.8c (2005).
doi: 10.1097/01.mlr.0000160375.47920.8c
pubmed: 15838407
Glasgow, R. E., Whitesides, H., Nelson, C. C. & King, D. K. Use of the patient assessment of chronic illness care (PACIC) with diabetic patients: Relationship to patient characteristics, receipt of care, and self-management. Diabetes Care 28(11), 2655–2661 (2005).
doi: 10.2337/diacare.28.11.2655
pubmed: 16249535
Gensichen, J. et al. The patient assessment of chronic illness care questionnaire: Evaluation in patients with mental disorders in primary care. Community Ment. Health J. 47(4), 447–453. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10597-010-9340-2 (2011).
doi: 10.1007/s10597-010-9340-2
pubmed: 20734231
Gensichen, J. et al. Panic disorder in primary care. Dtsch. Arztebl. Int. 116(10), 159–166. https://doi.org/10.3238/arztebl.2019.0159 (2019).
doi: 10.3238/arztebl.2019.0159
pubmed: 30995952
Gensichen, J. et al. Case management for depression by health care assistants in small primary care practices: A cluster randomized trial. Ann. Intern. Med. 151(6), 369–378. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-151-6-200909150-00001 (2009).
doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-151-6-200909150-00001
pubmed: 19755362
Gugiu, P. C., Coryn, C., Clark, R. & Kuehn, A. Development and evaluation of the short version of the patient assessment of chronic illness care instrument. Chronic Illn. 5(4), 268–276. https://doi.org/10.1177/1742395309348072 (2009).
doi: 10.1177/1742395309348072
pubmed: 19933249
Goetz, K. et al. Adaptation and psychometric properties of the PACIC short form. Am. J. Manag. Care 18(2), e55-60 (2012).
pubmed: 22435885
Arditi, C., Iglesias, K. & Peytremann-Bridevaux, I. The use of the Patient Assessment of Chronic Illness Care (PACIC) instrument in diabetes care: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int. J. Qual. Health Care 30(10), 743–750 (2018).
doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzy091
pubmed: 29733366
Kroenke, K., Spitzer, R. L. & Williams, J. B. The PHQ-9: Validity of a brief depression severity measure. J. Gen. Intern. Med. 16(9), 606–613. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1525-1497.2001.016009606.x (2001).
doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2001.016009606.x
pubmed: 11556941
pmcid: 1495268
Taggart, J. et al. Patients assessment of chronic illness care (PACIC) in two Australian studies: Structure and utility. J. Eval. Clin. Pract. 17(2), 215–221 (2011).
doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2010.01423.x
pubmed: 20846281
Rosemann, T., Laux, G., Szecsenyi, J. & Grol, R. The chronic care model: Congruency and predictors among primary care patients with osteoarthritis. Qual. Saf. Health Care 17(6), 442–446. https://doi.org/10.1136/qshc.2007.022822 (2008).
doi: 10.1136/qshc.2007.022822
pubmed: 19064660
Matre, P. J., Dahl, K., Jensen, R. & Nordahl, H. M. Working with Goals in Therapy (2013).
Alexander, P. A. The development of expertise: The journey from acclimation to proficiency. Educ. Res. 32(8), 10–14 (2003).
doi: 10.3102/0013189X032008010
Dreyfus, H., Dreyfus, S. E. & Athanasiou, T. Mind Over Machine: Simon and Schuster (2000).
Lukaschek, K. et al. Applicability of motivational interviewing for chronic disease management in primary care following a web-based E-learning course: Cross-sectional study. JMIR Ment. Health 6(4), e12540 (2019).
doi: 10.2196/12540
pubmed: 31033446
pmcid: 6658265
Durand, M.-A., DiMilia, P. R., Song, J., Yen, R. W. & Barr, P. J. Shared decision making embedded in the undergraduate medical curriculum: A scoping review. PLoS ONE 13(11), e0207012 (2018).
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0207012
pubmed: 30427901
pmcid: 6235351
Sanftenberg, L., Kuehne, F., Lukaschek, K., Meissner, K. & Gensichen, J. Shared decision making—A key competence of all health care professionals. Evaluation and adaptation of a digitally enhanced learning and teaching unit. J. Eur. CME 10(1), 1987119 (2021).
doi: 10.1080/21614083.2021.1987119
pubmed: 34790434
pmcid: 8592585
Tidhar, M. & Benbassat, J. Teaching shared decision making to undergraduate medical students. Rambam Maimonides Med. J. 12(4), e0032 (2021).
doi: 10.5041/RMMJ.10453
pubmed: 34709169
pmcid: 8549840
Thériault, G., Bell, N. R., Grad, R., Singh, H. & Szafran, O. Teaching shared decision making: An essential competency. Can. Fam. Phys. 65(7), 514–516 (2019).
Elwyn, G. et al. Implementing shared decision making in the NHS. BMJ 341, 5146 (2010).
doi: 10.1136/bmj.c5146
Wollny, A. et al. Shared decision making and patient-centeredness for patients with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes mellitus in primary care—Results of the cluster-randomised controlled DEBATE trial. BMC Fam. Pract. 22(1), 1–15 (2021).
doi: 10.1186/s12875-021-01436-6
Smith, P. B. et al. Individual and culture-level components of survey response styles: A multi-level analysis using cultural models of selfhood. Int. J. Psychol. 51(6), 453–463 (2016).
doi: 10.1002/ijop.12293
pubmed: 27374874