Exploring economic empowerment and gender in Lesotho's Child Grants Program: A qualitative study.

Lesotho cash transfer economic empowerment gender social protection women’s empowerment

Journal

Health policy and planning
ISSN: 1460-2237
Titre abrégé: Health Policy Plan
Pays: England
ID NLM: 8610614

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
08 Feb 2023
Historique:
received: 04 07 2022
revised: 19 11 2022
accepted: 07 02 2023
entrez: 10 2 2023
pubmed: 11 2 2023
medline: 11 2 2023
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Cash transfers have been increasingly used in low- and middle-income countries as a poverty reduction and social protection tool. Despite their potential for empowering vulnerable groups (especially women), the evidence for such outcomes remains unclear. Additionally, little is known about how this broad concept fits into and is perceived in such programs. For example, Lesotho's Child Grant Program (CGP) is an unconditional cash transfer targeting poor and vulnerable households with children. The CGP has been presented as one of Lesotho's flagship programs in developing the country's social safety net system. Using the CGP's early phases as a case study, this research aims to capture how program stakeholders understood and operationalized the concept of economic empowerment (especially women's) in Lesotho's CGP. The qualitative analysis relied on the triangulation of information from a review of program documents and semi-structured key informant interviews with program stakeholders. First, the program documents were coded deductively while the interview transcripts were coded inductively, then both materials were analyzed thematically. Finally, differences or disagreements within each theme were explored individually according to the program's chronology, the stakeholders' affiliation, and their role in the CGP. The complexity of economic empowerment was reflected in the diversity of definitions found in the desk review and interviews. Economic empowerment was primarily understood as improving access to economic resources and opportunities, and less so, as agency and social and economic inclusion. There were stronger disagreements on other definitions as they seemed to be a terminology primarily used by specific stakeholders. This diversity of definitions impacted how these concepts were integrated into the program, with particular gaps between the strategic vision and operational units as well as between the role this concept was perceived to play, and the effects evaluated so far.

Identifiants

pubmed: 36760020
pii: 7033724
doi: 10.1093/heapol/czad009
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Subventions

Organisme : NTNU Department of Sociology and Political Science
ID : "Småforsk" strategic research grant

Informations de copyright

© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press in association with The London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine.

Auteurs

Elodie Besnier (E)

Centre for Global Health Inequalities Research (CHAIN), Department of Sociology and Political Science, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU).
Department of Public Health and Nursing, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, NTNU.

Thandie Hlabana (T)

National University of Lesotho.
School of Environmental Sciences, University of Hull.

Virginia Kotzias (V)

Centre for Global Health Inequalities Research (CHAIN), Department of Sociology and Political Science, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU).

Kathryn Beck (K)

Centre for Global Health Inequalities Research (CHAIN), Department of Sociology and Political Science, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU).
Centre for Fertility and Health, Norwegian Institute of Public Health.

Celine Sieu (C)

UNICEF Country office Lesotho.

Kimanzi Muthengi (K)

UNICEF Country office Lesotho.

Classifications MeSH