Competency-Based Training and Assessment of Listening Skills: A Waitlist-Controlled Study in European Telephone Emergency Services.

helpline listening skills paraprofessional counselors telephone emergency services training

Journal

Clinical psychology in Europe
ISSN: 2625-3410
Titre abrégé: Clin Psychol Eur
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 9918266187206676

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Dec 2022
Historique:
received: 08 12 2021
accepted: 13 03 2022
entrez: 10 2 2023
pubmed: 11 2 2023
medline: 11 2 2023
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Telephone emergency services (TES) provide an essential part of suicide prevention and emotional support services across different health care settings. TES are usually provided by paraprofessional counselors, who need specific training in listening skills to meet the demands of callers. This project developed a competency-based training for listening skills which was then evaluated in a randomized controlled waitlist study across four EU countries (Germany, Hungary, Italy, and the Netherlands). Each country provided one training group and one waitlist group. Across countries, a total of 71 (trained: n = 36, waiting: n = 35) counselor trainees were assessed in a standardized, simulated emergency call with an actor client either before or after training participation. Calls were audiotaped and competencies in listening skills were evaluated by external raters using a standardized rating form. Trained counselors showed significantly better listening skills than participants from the waitlist condition. Results provide support for the efficacy of a competency-based training for listening skills in the field of TES across Europe. Furthermore, results demonstrated that a standardized competency-based assessment with an actor client is suitable to assess listening skills.

Sections du résumé

Background UNASSIGNED
Telephone emergency services (TES) provide an essential part of suicide prevention and emotional support services across different health care settings. TES are usually provided by paraprofessional counselors, who need specific training in listening skills to meet the demands of callers.
Method UNASSIGNED
This project developed a competency-based training for listening skills which was then evaluated in a randomized controlled waitlist study across four EU countries (Germany, Hungary, Italy, and the Netherlands). Each country provided one training group and one waitlist group. Across countries, a total of 71 (trained: n = 36, waiting: n = 35) counselor trainees were assessed in a standardized, simulated emergency call with an actor client either before or after training participation. Calls were audiotaped and competencies in listening skills were evaluated by external raters using a standardized rating form.
Results UNASSIGNED
Trained counselors showed significantly better listening skills than participants from the waitlist condition.
Conclusion UNASSIGNED
Results provide support for the efficacy of a competency-based training for listening skills in the field of TES across Europe. Furthermore, results demonstrated that a standardized competency-based assessment with an actor client is suitable to assess listening skills.

Identifiants

pubmed: 36762348
doi: 10.32872/cpe.7933
pii: cpe.7933
pmc: PMC9881125
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

e7933

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Références

Crisis. 2012;33(6):313-24
pubmed: 22759662
Health Soc Work. 2006 Aug;31(3):217-20
pubmed: 16955660
Psychol Rev. 1977 Mar;84(2):191-215
pubmed: 847061
J Clin Psychol. 2009 Jul;65(7):755-68
pubmed: 19437509
Behav Cogn Psychother. 2014 May;42(3):339-54
pubmed: 23481373
Psychother Res. 2009 Jan;19(1):96-113
pubmed: 19065285
Med Teach. 2005 Jan;27(1):10-28
pubmed: 16147767
Med Teach. 2010;32(8):676-82
pubmed: 20662580
Psychotherapy (Chic). 2006 Summer;43(2):154-72
pubmed: 22122035
J Clin Psychol. 2019 Dec;75(12):2273-2283
pubmed: 31386194
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Feb 24;18(5):
pubmed: 33668235
Suicide Life Threat Behav. 2007 Jun;37(3):291-307
pubmed: 17579542
Med Educ. 2012 Jan;46(1):49-57
pubmed: 22150196
J Gen Intern Med. 2008 Jan;23 Suppl 1:46-9
pubmed: 18095044
Psychother Res. 2016 Sep;26(5):511-29
pubmed: 26344392
Acad Med. 1990 Sep;65(9 Suppl):S63-7
pubmed: 2400509
Psychiatr Danub. 2020 Autumn - Winter;32(3-4):570-576
pubmed: 33370768
Front Psychol. 2019 Aug 30;10:1936
pubmed: 31543846
Psychol Bull. 1984 May;95(3):534-41
pubmed: 6399757
Behav Res Methods. 2007 May;39(2):175-91
pubmed: 17695343
J Telemed Telecare. 2008;14(1):42-7
pubmed: 18318929
Acad Med. 2007 May;82(5):493-502
pubmed: 17457074
Asian J Psychiatr. 2020 Jun;51:102074
pubmed: 32294583
Bull Menninger Clin. 2010 Winter;74(1):45-62
pubmed: 20235623

Auteurs

Simone Jennissen (S)

Department of General Internal Medicine and Psychosomatics, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Medical Faculty, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.

Stefan Schumacher (S)

TelefonSeelsorge Hagen-Mark, Hagen, Germany.

Diana Rucli (D)

Studio Rucli Formazione e Consulenza organizzativa, Udine, Italy.

Melinda Hal (M)

Department of Applied Psychology, Faculty of Health Sciences, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.
Szent Rókus Hospital, Psychiatry, Baja, Hungary.

András Székely (A)

Végeken Egészséglélektani Alapítvány, Budapest, Hungary.

Derek de Beurs (D)

Trimbos-instituut, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

Ulrike Dinger (U)

Department of General Internal Medicine and Psychosomatics, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Medical Faculty, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.

Classifications MeSH