Food word processing in Chinese reading: A study of restrained eaters.
attention allocation
eye movement
food word superiority
restrained eating
Journal
British journal of psychology (London, England : 1953)
ISSN: 2044-8295
Titre abrégé: Br J Psychol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 0373124
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
May 2023
May 2023
Historique:
revised:
20
01
2023
received:
04
04
2022
accepted:
27
01
2023
medline:
11
4
2023
pubmed:
11
2
2023
entrez:
10
2
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Food-related attentional bias refers that individuals typically prioritize rewarding food-related cues (e.g. food words and food images) compared with non-food stimuli; however, the findings are inconsistent for restrained eaters. Traditional paradigms used to test food-related attentional bias, such as visual probe tasks and visual search tasks, may not directly and accurately enough to reflect individuals' food-word processing at different cognitive stages. In this study, we introduced the boundary paradigm to investigate food-word attentional bias for both restrained and unrestrained eaters. Eye movements were recorded when they performed a naturalistic sentence-reading task. The results of later-stage analyses showed that food words were fixated on for less time than non-food words, which indicated a superiority of foveal food-word processing for both restrained and unrestrained eaters. The results of early-stage analyses showed that restrained eaters spent more time on pre-target regions in the food-word valid preview conditions, which indicated a parafoveal food-word processing superiority for restrained eaters (i.e. the parafoveal-on-foveal effect). The superiority of foveal food-word processing provides new insights into explaining food-related attentional bias in general groups. Additionally, the enhanced food-word attentional bias in parafoveal processing for restrained eaters illustrates the importance of individual characteristics in studying word recognition.
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
476-494Subventions
Organisme : Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities
ID : GK202103133
Organisme : Natural Science Foundation of Shaanxi Province
ID : 2022JQ-183
Informations de copyright
© 2023 The British Psychological Society.
Références
Alblas, M. C., Mollen, S., Fransen, M. L., & Putte, B. (2020). Food at first sight: An eye-tracking study on visual attention to palatable food cues on TV and subsequent unhealthy food intake in unsuccessful dieters. Appetite, 147, 104574.
Baayen, R. H., Davidson, D. J., & Bates, D. M. (2008). Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. Journal of Memory and Language, 59(4), 390-412. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2007.12.005
Bai, X., Yan, G., Liversedge, S. P., Zang, C., & Rayner, K. (2008). Reading spaced and unspaced Chinese text: Evidence from eye movements. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 34, 1277-1287.
Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67(1), 1-48. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01
Cherry, E. C. (1953). Some experiments on the recognition of speech, with one and with two ears. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 25, 975-979. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1907229
Chinese Linguistic Data Consortium. (2003). CLDC-LAC-2003-001. Tsinghua University, State Key Laboratory of Intelligent Technology and Systems, and Chinese Academy of Sciences, Institute of Automation.
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Collins, A. M., & Loftus, E. F. (1975). A spreading-activation theory of semantic processing. Psychological Review, 82, 407-428.
Coricelli, C., Foroni, F., Osimo, S. A., & Rumiati, R. I. (2019). Implicit and explicit evaluations of foods: The natural and transformed dimension. Food Quality and Preference, 73, 143-153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2018.11.014
Devoto, F., Zapparoli, L., Bonandrini, R., Berlingeri, M., Ferrulli, A., Luzi, L., Banfi, G., & Paulesu, E. (2018). Hungry brains: A meta-analytical review of brain activation imaging studies on food perception and appetite in obese individuals. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 94, 271-285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2018.07.017
Doolan, K. J., Breslin, G., Hanna, D., Murphy, K., & Gallagher, A. M. (2014). Visual attention to food cues in obesity: An eye-tracking study. Obesity, 22(12), 2501-2507. https://doi.org/10.1002/oby.20884
Engbert, R., Nuthmann, A., Richter, E. M., & Kliegl, R. (2005). SWIFT: A dynamical model of saccade generation during reading. Psychological Review, 112(4), 777-813.
Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Buchner, A., & Lang, A. G. (2009). Statistical power analyses using G*power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior Research Methods, 41(4), 1149-1160.
Giuliani, N. R., Merchant, J. S., Cosme, D., & Berkman, E. T. (2018). Neural predictors of eating behavior and dietary change. Annals of the new York Academy of Sciences, 1428(1), 208-220. https://doi.org/10.1111/nyas.13637
Hagan, K. E., Alasmar, A., Exum, A., Chinn, B., & Forbush, K. T. (2020). A systematic review and meta-analysis of attentional bias toward food in individuals with overweight and obesity. Appetite, 151, 104710.
Herman, C. P., & Polivy, J. (1980). Restrained eating. In A. J. Stunkard (Ed.), Obesity (pp. 208-225). Saunders.
Hollitt, S., Kemps, E., Tiggemann, M., Smeets, E., & Mills, J. S. (2010). Components of attentional bias for food cues among restrained eaters. Appetite, 54(2), 309-313. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2009.12.005
Jaeger, T. F. (2008). Categorical data analysis: Away from ANOVAs (transformation or not) and towards logit mixed models. Journal of Memory and Language, 59(4), 434-446.
Jiang, M. Y. W., & Vartanian, L. R. (2018). A review of existing measures of attentional biases in body image and eating disorders research. Australian Journal of Psychology, 70(1), 3-17. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajpy.12161
Kong, F., Zhang, Y., Chen, H., Shi, M., Todd, J., & Gao, X. (2011). The cognitive bias in food cues for restricted eaters: Evidences from behavioral and neuropsychological studies. Advances in Psychological Science, 19(9), 1355-1362. https://doi.org/10.3724/SP.J.1042.2011.01355
Koster, E., Crombez, G., Verschuere, B., & Houwer, J. D. (2004). Selective attention to threat in the dot probe paradigm: Differentiating vigilance and difficulty to disengage. Behavior Research and Therapy, 42(10), 1183-1192.
Kuznetsova, A., Brockhoff, P. B., & Christensen, R. H. B. (2016). lmerTest: Tests in linear mixed effects models [computer software]. https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/lmerTest/index.html
Li, X., Bicknell, K., Liu, P., Wei, W., & Rayner, K. (2014). Reading is fundamentally similar across disparate writing systems: A systematic characterization of how words and characters influence eye movements in Chinese reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143(2), 895-913. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0033580
Li, X., Huang, L., Yao, P., & Hyönä, J. (2022). Universal and specific reading mechanisms across different writing systems. Nature Reviews Psychology, 1, 133-144.
Li, X., & Pollatsek, A. (2020). An integrated model of word processing and eye-movement control during Chinese Reading. Psychological Review, 127(6), 1139-1162. https://doi.org/10.1037/rev0000248
Li, X., Rayner, K., & Cave, K. R. (2009). On the segmentation of Chinese words during reading. Cognitive Psychology, 58, 525-552.
Lipp, O. V., & Derakshan, N. (2005). Attentional bias to pictures of fear-relevant animals in a dot probe task. Emotion, 5(3), 365-369.
Liversedge, S. P., Drieghe, D., Li, X., Yan, G., Bai, X., & Hyönä, J. (2016). Universality in eye movements and reading: A trilingual investigation. Cognition, 147, 1-20.
Luo, C., Qiao, S., Zhuang, X., & Ma, G. (2022). Dynamic attentional bias for pictorial and textual food cues in the visual search paradigm. Appetite, 180, 106318. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2022.106318
Ma, G., & Li, X. (2013). Attention allocation during reading: Sequential or parallel. Advances in Psychological Science, 20, 1755-1767. https://doi.org/10.3724/SP.J.1042.2012.01755
Ma, G., Li, X., & Rayner, K. (2014). Word segmentation of overlapping ambiguous strings during Chinese reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 40, 1046-1059. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035389
Ma, G., Li, Z., Xu, F., & Li, X. (2019). The modulation of eye movement control by word length in reading chinese. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 72(7), 1620-1631. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747021818799994
Ma, G., Pollatsek, A., Li, Y., & Li, X. (2017). Chinese readers can perceive a word even when it's composed of noncontiguous characters. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 141(1), 158-166. https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000298
Ma, G., & Zhuang, X. (2021). Nutrition label processing in the past 10 years: Contributions from eye tracking approach. Appetite, 156, 104859.
Martin, E. (1974). Saccadic suppression: A review and an analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 81, 899-917. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0037368
Meteyard, L., & Davies, R. A. I. (2020). Best practice guidance for linear mixed-effects models in psychological science. Journal of Memory and Language, 112, 104092. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2020.104092
Nummenmaa, L., Hietanen, J. K., Calvo, M. G., & Hyona, J. (2011). Food catches the eye but not for everyone: A BMI-contingent attentional bias in rapid detection of nutriments. PLoS One, 6(5), e19215. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0019215
Papies, E. K., Stroebe, W., & Aarts, H. (2008). The allure of forbidden food: On the role of attention in self-regulation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44(5), 1283-1292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2008.04.008
Pimpini, L., Kochs, S., van Zoest, W., Jansen, A., & Roefs, A. (2022). Food captures attention, but not the eyes: An eye-tracking study on mindset and BMI's impact on attentional capture by high-caloric visual food stimuli. Journal of Cognition, 5(1), 19. https://doi.org/10.5334/joc.210
Polivy, J., Herman, C. P., & Mills, J. S. (2020). What is restrained eating and how do we identify it? Appetite, 155, 104820. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2020.104820
R Core Team. (2016). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
Ralph-Nearman, C., & Filik, R. (2018). Eating disorder symptomatology and body mass index are associated with readers' expectations about character behavior: Evidence from eye-tracking during reading. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 51(9), 1070-1079.
Rayner, K. (2009). Eye movements and attention in reading, scene, perception, and visual search. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62, 1457-1506.
Reichle, E. D., Liversedge, S. P., Drieghe, D., Blythe, H. I., Joseph, H. S., White, S. J., & Rayner, K. (2013). Using E-Z reader to examine the concurrent development of eye-movement control and reading skill. Developmental Review, 33, 110-149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2013.03.001
Schotter, E. R. (2013). Synonyms provide semantic preview benefit in English. Journal of Memory and Language, 69(4), 619-633. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2013.09.002
Schotter, E. R., Angele, B., & Rayner, K. (2012). Parafoveal processing in reading. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 71(1), 5-35. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-011-0219-2
Soetens, B., & Braet, C. (2007). Information processing of food cues in overweight and normal weight adolescents. British Journal of Health Psychology, 12, 285-304. https://doi.org/10.1348/135910706x107604
Stroebe, W., Mensink, W., Aarts, H., Schut, H., & Kruglanski, A. W. (2008). Why dieters fail: Testing the goal conflict model of eating. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44(1), 26-36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2007.01.005
Stroebe, W., van Koningsbruggen, G. M., Papies, E. K., & Aarts, H. (2013). Why most dieters fail but some succeed: A goal conflict model of eating behavior. Psychological Review, 120(1), 110-138. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0030849
Sui, X., Zhang, Y., Hou, X., & Li, L. (2020). The attentional bias for food cues and its neural mechanism. Advances in Psychological Science, 28(12), 2040-2051. https://doi.org/10.3724/sp.J.1042.2020.02040
Van Loo, E. J., Grebitus, C., Nayga, R. M., Verbeke, W., & Roosen, J. (2018). On the measurement of consumer preferences and food choice behavior: The relation between visual attention and choices. Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, 40, 538-562.
van Strien, T., Frijters, J. E. R., Bergers, G. P. A., & Defares, P. B. (1986). The Dutch eating behavior questionnaire (DEBQ) for assessment of restrained, emotional, and external eating behavior. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 5(2), 295-315.
Veenstra, E. M., & Jong, P. J. D. (2012). Attentional bias in restrictive eating disorders. Stronger attentional avoidance of high-fat food compared to healthy controls? Appetite, 58(1), 133-140.
Veldre, A., & Andrews, S. (2016). Semantic preview benefit in English: Individual differences in the extraction and use of Parafoveal semantic information. Journal of Experimental Psychology:Learning Memory and Cognition, 42(6), 837-854. https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000212
Wang, J., Angele, B., Ma, G., & Li, X. (2021). Repetition causes confusion: Insights to word segmentation during Chinese reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition, 47(1), 147-156. https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000817
Weng, C., Chen, H., & Zhu, L. (2012). Attentional biases toward food-related information among restrained eaters based on the goal conflict model of eating. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 44(5), 680-689.
Werthmann, J., Jansen, A., & Roefs, A. (2015). Worry or craving? A selective review of evidence for food-related attention biases in obese individuals, eating-disorder patients, restrained eaters and healthy samples. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society, 74(2), 99-114.
Werthmann, J., Roefs, A., Nederkoorn, C., Mogg, K., Bradley, B. P., & Jansen, A. (2011). Can(not) take my eyes off it: Attention bias for food in overweight participants. Health Psychology, 30(5), 561-569. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0024291
Werthmann, J., Roefs, A., Nederkoorn, C., Mogg, K., Bradley, B. P., & Jansen, A. (2013). Attention bias for food is independent of restraint in healthy weight individuals: An eye tracking study. Eating Behaviors, 14(3), 397-400. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eatbeh.2013.06.005
Werthmann, J., Simic, M., Konstantellou, A., Mansfield, P., Mercado, D., van Ens, W., & Schmidt, U. (2019). Same, same but different: Attention bias for food cues in adults and adolescents with anorexia nervosa. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 52(6), 681-690. https://doi.org/10.1002/eat.23064
Yan, M., Richter, E. M., Shu, H., & Kliegl, R. (2009). Readers of Chinese extract semantic information from parafoveal words. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16(3), 561-566. https://doi.org/10.3758/pbr.16.3.561
Yan, M., & Sommer, W. (2015). Parafoveal-on-Foveal effects of emotional word semantics in reading Chinese sentences: Evidence from eye movements. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 41, 1237-1243. https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000095
Yan, M., Zhou, W., Shu, H., & Kliegl, R. (2012). Lexical and sub-lexical semantic preview benefits in Chinese reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 38(4), 1069-1075. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026935.
Yang, J., Wang, S., Tong, T., & Rayner, K. (2012). Semantic and plausibility effects on preview benefit during eye fixations in chinese reading. Reading & Writing, 25(5), 1031-1052.
Zang, C., Liang, F., Bai, X., Yan, G. & Liversedge, S. P. (2013). Inter-word spacing and landing position effects during chinese reading in children and adults. Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance, 39(3), 720-734.
Zhu, M., Zhuang, X., & Ma, G. (2021). Readers extract semantic information from parafoveal two-character synonyms in Chinese reading. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 34, 773-790. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-020-10092-8