Probability and intentional action.

Choice Intentional action Probability Probability raising Theory of mind

Journal

Cognitive psychology
ISSN: 1095-5623
Titre abrégé: Cogn Psychol
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 0241111

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
03 2023
Historique:
received: 29 08 2022
revised: 30 01 2023
accepted: 30 01 2023
pubmed: 11 2 2023
medline: 15 3 2023
entrez: 10 2 2023
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

How does probability affect attributions of intentionality? In five experiments (total N = 1410), we provide evidence for a probability raising account holding that people are more likely to see the outcome of an agent's action as intentional if the agent does something to increase the odds of that outcome. Experiment 1 found that high probability without probability raising does not suffice for strong attributions of intentionality. Participants were more likely to conclude a girl intentionally obtained a desired gumball from a single gumball machine when it offered favorable odds for getting that kind of gumball compared with when it offered poor odds, but their attributions of intentionality were lukewarm. Experiments 2 and 3 then found stronger attributions of intentionality when the girl raised her probability of success by choosing to use machines offering favorable odds over machines offering poor odds. Finally, Experiments 4 and 5 examined whether these effects of probability raising might reduce to consideration of agents' beliefs and expectations. We found that although these mental states do matter, probability raising matters too-people attribute intentional actions to agents who increase their odds of success, rather than to agents who merely become convinced that success is likely. We discuss the implications of these findings for claims that control and skill contribute to attributions of intentional action.

Identifiants

pubmed: 36764242
pii: S0010-0285(23)00009-9
doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2023.101551
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

101551

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Auteurs

Spencer R Ericson (SR)

Department of Psychology, University of Waterloo, Canada.

Stephanie Denison (S)

Department of Psychology, University of Waterloo, Canada.

John Turri (J)

Department of Philosophy and Cognitive Science Program, University of Waterloo, Canada.

Ori Friedman (O)

Department of Psychology, University of Waterloo, Canada. Electronic address: friedman@uwaterloo.ca.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH