Efficacy of subsequent treatments in patients with hormone-positive advanced breast cancer who had disease progression under CDK 4/6 inhibitor therapy.
Advanced breast cancer
Cyclin-dependent kinase
Endocrine treatment
Everolimus
Fulvestrant
Hormonotherapy
Palbociclib
Ribociclib
Journal
BMC cancer
ISSN: 1471-2407
Titre abrégé: BMC Cancer
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100967800
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
10 Feb 2023
10 Feb 2023
Historique:
received:
15
09
2022
accepted:
03
02
2023
entrez:
11
2
2023
pubmed:
12
2
2023
medline:
15
2
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
There is no standard treatment recommended at category 1 level in international guidelines for subsequent therapy after cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitor (CDK4/6) based therapy. We aimed to evaluate which subsequent treatment oncologists prefer in patients with disease progression under CDKi. In addition, we aimed to show the effectiveness of systemic treatments after CDKi and whether there is a survival difference between hormonal treatments (monotherapy vs. mTOR-based). A total of 609 patients from 53 centers were included in the study. Progression-free-survivals (PFS) of subsequent treatments (chemotherapy (CT, n:434) or endocrine therapy (ET, n:175)) after CDKi were calculated. Patients were evaluated in three groups as those who received CDKi in first-line (group A, n:202), second-line (group B, n: 153) and ≥ 3rd-line (group C, n: 254). PFS was compared according to the use of ET and CT. In addition, ET was compared as monotherapy versus everolimus-based combination therapy. The median duration of CDKi in the ET arms of Group A, B, and C was 17.0, 11.0, and 8.5 months in respectively; it was 9.0, 7.0, and 5.0 months in the CT arm. Median PFS after CDKi was 9.5 (5.0-14.0) months in the ET arm of group A, and 5.3 (3.9-6.8) months in the CT arm (p = 0.073). It was 6.7 (5.8-7.7) months in the ET arm of group B, and 5.7 (4.6-6.7) months in the CT arm (p = 0.311). It was 5.3 (2.5-8.0) months in the ET arm of group C and 4.0 (3.5-4.6) months in the CT arm (p = 0.434). Patients who received ET after CDKi were compared as those who received everolimus-based combination therapy versus those who received monotherapy ET: the median PFS in group A, B, and C was 11.0 vs. 5.9 (p = 0.047), 6.7 vs. 5.0 (p = 0.164), 6.7 vs. 3.9 (p = 0.763) months. Physicians preferred CT rather than ET in patients with early progression under CDKi. It has been shown that subsequent ET after CDKi can be as effective as CT. It was also observed that better PFS could be achieved with the subsequent everolimus-based treatments after first-line CDKi compared to monotherapy ET.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
There is no standard treatment recommended at category 1 level in international guidelines for subsequent therapy after cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitor (CDK4/6) based therapy. We aimed to evaluate which subsequent treatment oncologists prefer in patients with disease progression under CDKi. In addition, we aimed to show the effectiveness of systemic treatments after CDKi and whether there is a survival difference between hormonal treatments (monotherapy vs. mTOR-based).
METHODS
METHODS
A total of 609 patients from 53 centers were included in the study. Progression-free-survivals (PFS) of subsequent treatments (chemotherapy (CT, n:434) or endocrine therapy (ET, n:175)) after CDKi were calculated. Patients were evaluated in three groups as those who received CDKi in first-line (group A, n:202), second-line (group B, n: 153) and ≥ 3rd-line (group C, n: 254). PFS was compared according to the use of ET and CT. In addition, ET was compared as monotherapy versus everolimus-based combination therapy.
RESULTS
RESULTS
The median duration of CDKi in the ET arms of Group A, B, and C was 17.0, 11.0, and 8.5 months in respectively; it was 9.0, 7.0, and 5.0 months in the CT arm. Median PFS after CDKi was 9.5 (5.0-14.0) months in the ET arm of group A, and 5.3 (3.9-6.8) months in the CT arm (p = 0.073). It was 6.7 (5.8-7.7) months in the ET arm of group B, and 5.7 (4.6-6.7) months in the CT arm (p = 0.311). It was 5.3 (2.5-8.0) months in the ET arm of group C and 4.0 (3.5-4.6) months in the CT arm (p = 0.434). Patients who received ET after CDKi were compared as those who received everolimus-based combination therapy versus those who received monotherapy ET: the median PFS in group A, B, and C was 11.0 vs. 5.9 (p = 0.047), 6.7 vs. 5.0 (p = 0.164), 6.7 vs. 3.9 (p = 0.763) months.
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
Physicians preferred CT rather than ET in patients with early progression under CDKi. It has been shown that subsequent ET after CDKi can be as effective as CT. It was also observed that better PFS could be achieved with the subsequent everolimus-based treatments after first-line CDKi compared to monotherapy ET.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36765293
doi: 10.1186/s12885-023-10609-8
pii: 10.1186/s12885-023-10609-8
pmc: PMC9912535
doi:
Substances chimiques
Everolimus
9HW64Q8G6G
Receptor, ErbB-2
EC 2.7.10.1
Protein Kinase Inhibitors
0
Fulvestrant
22X328QOC4
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
136Commentaires et corrections
Type : ErratumIn
Informations de copyright
© 2023. The Author(s).
Références
Colditz GA, Rosner BA, Chen WY, Holmes MD, Hankinson SE. Risk factors for breast cancer according to estrogen and progesterone receptor status. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2004;96(3):218–28.
doi: 10.1093/jnci/djh025
pubmed: 14759989
Gennari A, André F, Barrios C, Cortés J, De Azambuja E, DeMichele A, et al. ESMO Clinical Practice Guideline for the diagnosis, staging and treatment of patients with metastatic breast cancer☆. Ann Oncol. 2021;32(12):1475–95.
doi: 10.1016/j.annonc.2021.09.019
pubmed: 34678411
Gradishar WJ. NCCN Guidelines Updates: Management of Patients With HER2-Negative Breast Cancer. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2022;20(5.5):561–5.
doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2022.5016
Karacin C, Ergun Y, Oksuzoglu OB. Saying goodbye to primary endocrine resistance for advanced breast cancer? Med Oncol. 2021;38(1):1–2.
doi: 10.1007/s12032-020-01449-8
Hortobagyi GN, Stemmer SM, Burris HA, Yap Y-S, Sonke GS, Paluch-Shimon S, et al. Ribociclib as first-line therapy for HR-positive, advanced breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2016;375(18):1738–48.
doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1609709
pubmed: 27717303
Finn RS, Martin M, Rugo HS, Jones S, Im S-A, Gelmon K, et al. Palbociclib and letrozole in advanced breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2016;375(20):1925–36.
doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1607303
pubmed: 27959613
Rugo HS, Lerebours F, Ciruelos E, Drullinsky P, Ruiz-Borrego M, Neven P, et al. Alpelisib plus fulvestrant in PIK3CA-mutated, hormone receptor-positive advanced breast cancer after a CDK4/6 inhibitor (BYLieve): one cohort of a phase 2, multicentre, open-label, non-comparative study. Lancet Oncol. 2021;22(4):489–98.
doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(21)00034-6
pubmed: 33794206
Princic N, Aizer A, Tang DH, Smith DM, Johnson W, Bardia A. Predictors of systemic therapy sequences following a CDK 4/6 inhibitor-based regimen in post-menopausal women with hormone receptor positive, HEGFR-2 negative metastatic breast cancer. Curr Med Res Opin. 2019;35(1):73–80.
doi: 10.1080/03007995.2018.1519500
pubmed: 30175631
Masuda N, Mukai H, Inoue K, Rai Y, Ohno S, Ohtani S, et al. Analysis of subsequent therapy in Japanese patients with hormone receptor-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative advanced breast cancer who received palbociclib plus endocrine therapy in PALOMA-2 and-3. Breast Cancer. 2021;28(2):335–45.
doi: 10.1007/s12282-020-01162-4
pubmed: 33085032
Rossi L, Biagioni C, McCartney A, Migliaccio I, Curigliano G, Sanna G, et al. Clinical outcomes after palbociclib with or without endocrine therapy in postmenopausal women with hormone receptor positive and HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer enrolled in the TREnd trial. Breast Cancer Res. 2019;21(1):1–7.
doi: 10.1186/s13058-019-1149-5
Xi J, Oza A, Thomas S, Ademuyiwa F, Weilbaecher K, Suresh R, et al. Retrospective analysis of treatment patterns and effectiveness of palbociclib and subsequent regimens in metastatic breast cancer. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2019;17(2):141–7.
doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2018.7094
pubmed: 30787127
pmcid: 6752198
Baselga J, Campone M, Piccart M, Burris HA III, Rugo HS, Sahmoud T, et al. Everolimus in postmenopausal hormone-receptor–positive advanced breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2012;366(6):520–9.
doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1109653
pubmed: 22149876
Rozenblit M, Mun S, Soulos P, Adelson K, Pusztai L, Mougalian S. Patterns of treatment with everolimus exemestane in hormone receptor-positive HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer in the era of targeted therapy. Breast Cancer Res. 2021;23(1):1–10.
doi: 10.1186/s13058-021-01394-y
Dhakal A, Antony Thomas R, Levine EG, Brufsky A, Takabe K, Hanna MG, et al. Outcome of everolimus-based therapy in hormone-receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer patients after progression on palbociclib. Breast Cancer: Basic and Clinical Research. 2020;14:1178223420944864.
pubmed: 32753876
Cook MM, Al Rabadi L, Kaempf AJ, Saraceni MM, Savin MA, Mitri ZI. Everolimus Plus Exemestane Treatment in Patients with Metastatic Hormone Receptor-Positive Breast Cancer Previously Treated with CDK4/6 Inhibitor Therapy. Oncologist. 2021;26(2):101–6.
doi: 10.1002/onco.13609
pubmed: 33230905