Genomic Prostate Score: A New Tool to Assess Prognosis and Optimize Radiation Therapy Volumes and ADT in Intermediate-Risk Prostate Cancer.
genomic prostate score
gleason score
prostate cancer
radiation therapy
risk assessment
Journal
Cancers
ISSN: 2072-6694
Titre abrégé: Cancers (Basel)
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101526829
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
02 Feb 2023
02 Feb 2023
Historique:
received:
25
12
2022
revised:
28
01
2023
accepted:
30
01
2023
entrez:
11
2
2023
pubmed:
12
2
2023
medline:
12
2
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Genomic classifiers such as the Genomic Prostate Score (GPS) could help to personalize treatment for men with intermediate-risk prostate cancer (I-PCa). In this study, we aimed to evaluate the ability of the GPS to change therapeutic decision making in I-PCa. Only patients in the intermediate NCCN risk group with Gleason score 3 + 4 were considered. The primary objective was to assess the impact of the GPS on risk stratification: NCCN clinical and genomic risk versus NCCN clinical risk stratification alone. We also analyzed the predictive role of the GPS for locally advanced disease (≥pT3+) and the potential change in treatment strategy. Thirty patients were tested for their GPS between November 2018 and March 2020, with the median age being 70 (45-79). Twenty-three patients had a clinical T1 stage. Eighteen patients were classified as favorable intermediate risk (FIR) based on the NCCN criteria. The median GPS score was 39 (17-70). Among the 23 patients who underwent a radical prostatectomy, Gleason score 3 + 4 was found in 18 patients. There was a significant correlation between the GPS and the percentage of a Gleason grade 4 or higher pattern in the surgical sample: correlation coefficient r = 0.56; 95% CI = 0.2-0.8;
Identifiants
pubmed: 36765902
pii: cancers15030945
doi: 10.3390/cancers15030945
pmc: PMC9913491
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Références
J Clin Oncol. 2021 Apr 10;39(11):1234-1242
pubmed: 33497252
J Clin Oncol. 2004 Sep 15;22(18):3726-32
pubmed: 15365069
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2011 Nov 15;81(4):e361-7
pubmed: 21820250
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2006 May 17;98(10):715-7
pubmed: 16705126
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2009 Jun 16;101(12):878-87
pubmed: 19509351
Eur Urol. 2018 Jan;73(1):129-138
pubmed: 28988753
Lancet Oncol. 2015 Mar;16(3):320-7
pubmed: 25702876
Eur Urol. 2020 Jan;77(1):38-52
pubmed: 31493960
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2022 Dec 31;:
pubmed: 36596346
J Clin Oncol. 2020 May 1;38(13):1474-1494
pubmed: 31829902
Eur Urol. 2014 Sep;66(3):550-60
pubmed: 24836057
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2022 Dec 31;:
pubmed: 36596347
Cancers (Basel). 2022 Jul 04;14(13):
pubmed: 35805043
JAMA. 2005 Jul 27;294(4):440-7
pubmed: 16046650
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2023 Jan 1;115(1):120-131
pubmed: 36306979
Urology. 2020 Sep;143:103-111
pubmed: 32525077
Lancet Oncol. 2012 Jun;13(6):e259-69
pubmed: 22652234
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2019 Jan 1;103(1):84-91
pubmed: 30170099