The Role of mpMRI in the Assessment of Prostate Cancer Recurrence Using the PI-RR System: Diagnostic Accuracy and Interobserver Agreement in Readers with Different Expertise.
biochemical recurrence
multiparametric MRI
prostate cancer
Journal
Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)
ISSN: 2075-4418
Titre abrégé: Diagnostics (Basel)
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101658402
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
20 Jan 2023
20 Jan 2023
Historique:
received:
13
12
2022
revised:
09
01
2023
accepted:
17
01
2023
entrez:
11
2
2023
pubmed:
12
2
2023
medline:
12
2
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
treated prostate cancer (PCa) patients develop biochemical recurrence (BCR) in 27-53% of cases; the role of MRI in this setting is still controversial. In 2021 a panel of experts proposed a "Prostate Imaging-Recurrence Reporting" (PI-RR) score, aiming to standardize the reporting. The aim of our study is to evaluate the reproducibility of the PI-RR scoring system among readers with different expertise. in this monocentric, retrospective observational study, the images of patients who underwent MRI with BCR from January 2017 to January 2022 were analyzed by two radiologists and a radiology resident. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and accuracy were obtained. Interobserver agreement was calculated. The percentage of the PI-RR score of 3 was estimated to find out the proportion of uncertain exams reported among the readers. a total of seventy-six patients were included in our study: eight previously treated with RT and sixty-eight who underwent surgery. The accuracy range was 75-80%, the sensitivity 68.4-71.1%, the specificity 81.6-89.5%, PPV 78.8-87.1%, and NPV 72.1-75.6%. The inter-reader agreement using a binary evaluation (PI-RR ≥ 3 as positive mpMRI) demonstrated a correlation coefficient (k) of 0.74 (95% CI: 0.62-0.87). The percentage for the PI-RR score of 3 was 6.6% for reader one, 14.5% for reader two, and 2.6% for reader three. this study confirmed the good accuracy of mpMRI in the detection of local recurrence of PCa and the good reproducibility of PI-RR score among all readers, confirming it to be a promising tool for the standardization of the assessment of patients with BCR.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
treated prostate cancer (PCa) patients develop biochemical recurrence (BCR) in 27-53% of cases; the role of MRI in this setting is still controversial. In 2021 a panel of experts proposed a "Prostate Imaging-Recurrence Reporting" (PI-RR) score, aiming to standardize the reporting. The aim of our study is to evaluate the reproducibility of the PI-RR scoring system among readers with different expertise.
METHODS
METHODS
in this monocentric, retrospective observational study, the images of patients who underwent MRI with BCR from January 2017 to January 2022 were analyzed by two radiologists and a radiology resident. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and accuracy were obtained. Interobserver agreement was calculated. The percentage of the PI-RR score of 3 was estimated to find out the proportion of uncertain exams reported among the readers.
RESULTS
RESULTS
a total of seventy-six patients were included in our study: eight previously treated with RT and sixty-eight who underwent surgery. The accuracy range was 75-80%, the sensitivity 68.4-71.1%, the specificity 81.6-89.5%, PPV 78.8-87.1%, and NPV 72.1-75.6%. The inter-reader agreement using a binary evaluation (PI-RR ≥ 3 as positive mpMRI) demonstrated a correlation coefficient (k) of 0.74 (95% CI: 0.62-0.87). The percentage for the PI-RR score of 3 was 6.6% for reader one, 14.5% for reader two, and 2.6% for reader three.
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
this study confirmed the good accuracy of mpMRI in the detection of local recurrence of PCa and the good reproducibility of PI-RR score among all readers, confirming it to be a promising tool for the standardization of the assessment of patients with BCR.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36766492
pii: diagnostics13030387
doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13030387
pmc: PMC9914595
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Subventions
Organisme : Ministero della Salute
ID : Grant for Current Research R779A
Références
Abdom Radiol (NY). 2020 Jul;45(7):2184-2197
pubmed: 31788708
Eur Radiol. 2023 Feb;33(2):748-751
pubmed: 36048204
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2006 Jul 15;65(4):965-74
pubmed: 16798415
Cancer. 2008 Mar 15;112(6):1254-63
pubmed: 18286530
Cancers (Basel). 2022 Sep 28;14(19):
pubmed: 36230647
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2020 Jan;214(1):W37-W43
pubmed: 31670591
Eur Radiol. 2010 May;20(5):1254-66
pubmed: 19921202
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2013 Feb 1;85(2):378-84
pubmed: 22717242
J Nucl Med. 2022 Nov 23;:
pubmed: 36418170
Minerva Urol Nefrol. 2020 Aug;72(4):464-473
pubmed: 31144486
Radiology. 2020 Sep;296(3):564-572
pubmed: 32633674
Radiology. 2004 May;231(2):379-85
pubmed: 15064390
Radiology. 2022 Aug;304(2):342-350
pubmed: 35536130
Eur Urol Oncol. 2019 Feb;2(1):47-76
pubmed: 30929846
Eur Urol Oncol. 2021 Dec;4(6):868-876
pubmed: 33582104
Eur Urol Focus. 2019 Jul;5(4):550-560
pubmed: 29133278
Am J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2020 Apr 15;10(2):106-118
pubmed: 32419979
J Am Coll Radiol. 2018 May;15(5S):S132-S149
pubmed: 29724417
Eur Urol. 2019 Sep;76(3):340-351
pubmed: 30898406
Front Oncol. 2022 Jan 28;12:831429
pubmed: 35155262
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2016 Jul;43(8):1397-9
pubmed: 27118189
Clin Adv Hematol Oncol. 2013 Jan;11(1):14-23
pubmed: 23416859
Urology. 2004 May;63(5):922-7
pubmed: 15134982