Preoperative Hilar and Mediastinal Lymph Node Staging in Patients with Suspected or Diagnosed Lung Cancer: Accuracy of 18F-FDG-PET/CT:A Retrospective Cohort Study of 138 Patients.
18F-FDG-PET/CT scan
diagnostic accuracy
lung cancer
lymph nodes
staging
Journal
Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)
ISSN: 2075-4418
Titre abrégé: Diagnostics (Basel)
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101658402
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
22 Jan 2023
22 Jan 2023
Historique:
received:
03
11
2022
revised:
08
01
2023
accepted:
16
01
2023
entrez:
11
2
2023
pubmed:
12
2
2023
medline:
12
2
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of integrated 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission computed tomography (18F-FDG-PET/CT) in hilar and mediastinal lymph node (HMLN) staging of suspected or proven lung cancer, and to investigate potential risk factors for false negative and false positive HMLN metastases. We retrospectively analyzed 162 consecutive patients with suspected or pathologically proven non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was generated to determine the diagnostic efficacy of 18F-FDG-PET/CT. Univariate and multivariate analyses were conducted to detect risk factors of false positives and false negatives. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and accuracy of integrated 18F-FDG-PET/CT in detecting HMLN metastases were 59.1% (26/44), 69.1% (65/94), 47.3% (26/55), 78.3% (65/83), and 65.9% (91/138), respectively. The ROC curve showed an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.625 (95%-CI 0.468-0.782). The incidence of false negative and false positive HMLN metastases was 21.7% (18/83) and 52.7% (29/55), respectively. Our data shows that integrated 18F-FDG-PET/CT staging provides lower specificity and sensitivity. This confirms the ESTS guideline on lymph node staging for PET-positive HMLN. Yet it advocates more invasive staging even for PET-negative HMLN.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36766508
pii: diagnostics13030403
doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13030403
pmc: PMC9914665
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Références
Thorac Cancer. 2016 Jul;7(4):473-80
pubmed: 27385991
Thorac Surg Clin. 2008 Nov;18(4):403-15
pubmed: 19086609
Ann Thorac Surg. 2013 Jan;95(1):276-84
pubmed: 23200231
PLoS One. 2013 Oct 25;8(10):e78552
pubmed: 24205256
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2005 Jul;130(1):160-5
pubmed: 15999057
BMJ. 2005 Feb 26;330(7489):439
pubmed: 15731139
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2008 Jan;33(1):104-9
pubmed: 17977738
Ann Thorac Surg. 2004 Sep;78(3):1017-23; discussion 1017-23
pubmed: 15337041
Respir Care Clin N Am. 2003 Jun;9(2):141-62
pubmed: 12911287
Radiology. 2005 Sep;236(3):1011-9
pubmed: 16014441
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2021 Aug;48(9):2894-2903
pubmed: 33547554
J Thorac Oncol. 2015 Dec;10(12):1675-84
pubmed: 26709477
Ann Thorac Surg. 2005 Jan;79(1):375-82
pubmed: 15620991
Clin Lung Cancer. 2008 Mar;9(2):92-101
pubmed: 18501095
Surg Oncol. 2012 Sep;21(3):230-6
pubmed: 22197027
Radiology. 2004 May;231(2):305-32
pubmed: 15044750
Ann Thorac Surg. 2007 Jul;84(1):177-81
pubmed: 17588407
Curr Opin Pulm Med. 2004 Jul;10(4):248-55
pubmed: 15220747
J Thorac Oncol. 2015 Nov;10(11):1515-22
pubmed: 26536193
J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1993 Nov-Dec;17(6):841-6
pubmed: 8227566
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2011 Apr;39(4):e38-43
pubmed: 21242094
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2010 May;37(5):1168-74
pubmed: 20116273
J Thorac Oncol. 2015 Sep;10(9):1243-1260
pubmed: 26291008
J Thorac Oncol. 2015 Jul;10(7):990-1003
pubmed: 26134221