Multiple Pregnancy and the Risk of Postpartum Hemorrhage: Retrospective Analysis in a Tertiary Level Center of Care.
multiple pregnancy
postpartum hemorrhage
twins
Journal
Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)
ISSN: 2075-4418
Titre abrégé: Diagnostics (Basel)
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101658402
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
26 Jan 2023
26 Jan 2023
Historique:
received:
17
12
2022
revised:
16
01
2023
accepted:
21
01
2023
entrez:
11
2
2023
pubmed:
12
2
2023
medline:
12
2
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The aim of our study was to identify characteristics associated with postpartum hemorrhage (PPH defined as blood loss >1000 mL) in twin pregnancies in order to select patients at higher risk to be treated. This retrospective study includes multiple pregnancies between 2015 and 2020. The possible association between pregnancy characteristics and the primary endpoint (occurrence of PPH) was conducted using chi-square or Fisher exact test and Wilcoxon test. Then, univariate logistic models were performed considering as outcome the PPH, and the odds ratios with 95% CI were estimated. Finally, a multivariate logistic model was implemented, including all significant covariates. Seven hundred seven twin pregnancies giving birth beyond 32 weeks were included and of those, 120 (16.97%) had a PPH. The univariate analysis showed that factors significantly associated with PPH were: Preterm delivery, episiotomy, neonatal weight, and mode of delivery. The multivariate analysis showed that the most important factors were episiotomy and neonatal weight. The results show that the performance of episiotomy and the neonatal weight are the factors that most impact the risk of PPH in twin pregnancies. The correct identification of factors associated with PPH in twins could ideally allow to modify the clinical management and positively affect the rate of complications.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36766551
pii: diagnostics13030446
doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13030446
pmc: PMC9914228
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Références
Lancet Glob Health. 2014 Jun;2(6):e323-33
pubmed: 25103301
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Sep;213(3):376.e1-8
pubmed: 25957018
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2012 May;25(5):456-60
pubmed: 22081903
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2020 Jan;33(2):267-271
pubmed: 30033782
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2016 Jan 25;16:17
pubmed: 26810108
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2020 Nov;33(22):3740-3745
pubmed: 30836810
Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Jul;122(1):120-126
pubmed: 23743452
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2016 Oct;29(19):3067-71
pubmed: 26553843
Lancet. 2006 Apr 1;367(9516):1066-1074
pubmed: 16581405
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2004 Jan;84(1):71-3
pubmed: 14698833
Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Jun;56(3):273-275
pubmed: 28600032
Obstet Gynecol. 2003 Jan;101(1):129-35
pubmed: 12517657
Obstet Gynecol. 2000 Jun;95(6 Pt 1):899-904
pubmed: 10831988
PLoS One. 2022 Mar 11;17(3):e0265180
pubmed: 35275972
Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Feb;129(2):305-310
pubmed: 28079778
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Nov;209(5):449.e1-7
pubmed: 23871950
BJOG. 2014 Aug;121(9):1137-44
pubmed: 24575851
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Jul;209(1):51.e1-6
pubmed: 23507549
Obstet Gynecol. 2003 Oct;102(4):806-15
pubmed: 14551012