Aesthetic Results, Functional Outcome and Radiographic Analysis in THA by Direct Anterior, Bikini and Postero-Lateral Approach: Is It Worth the Hassle?
aesthetic
bikini
direct anterior approach
hip
total hip arthroplasty
Journal
Journal of clinical medicine
ISSN: 2077-0383
Titre abrégé: J Clin Med
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101606588
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
30 Jan 2023
30 Jan 2023
Historique:
received:
30
11
2022
revised:
24
01
2023
accepted:
28
01
2023
entrez:
11
2
2023
pubmed:
12
2
2023
medline:
12
2
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Total hip arthroplasty (THA) can be performed by several approaches such as direct anterior (DAA), direct lateral (DL) and postero-lateral (PL). Our study was conducted to compare among different approaches, such as DAA, bikini (BK) and PL, the aesthetic impact of the scar, differences in the position of prosthetic components and differences in functional rehabilitation outcomes. Materials and methods: Population, composed by 240 patients, was collected among patients treated for primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) from 1 January 2017 to 31 December 2021 and divided by surgical approach. Of these, 160 female patients were included in the current analysis, leaving 58 DAA, 52 BK patients and 50 PL patients. Demographic and clinical parameters were retrospectively collected: age, BMI, time of surgery, length of stay, Harris Hip Score (HHS) before and after surgery at 6 months and patient, intra/post-surgical complications and Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS). Results and Discussion: Our results showed a better aesthetical result in BK group compared to DAA group and faster rehabilitation with the DAA compared to PL. Optimal cup positioning was reached both in PL approach and DAA approach. DAA showed no increase in complications compared to PL approach and offered a faster recovery. Bikini approach is an alternative to the standard DAA approach and can be proposed for patients where a better aesthetic result is desired in addition to better functional recover.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36769719
pii: jcm12031072
doi: 10.3390/jcm12031072
pmc: PMC9917607
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Références
Oper Orthop Traumatol. 2021 Aug;33(4):318-330
pubmed: 34338830
Bone Joint J. 2018 Jul;100-B(7):853-861
pubmed: 29954218
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2018 Feb;28(2):255-267
pubmed: 28956180
Ortop Traumatol Rehabil. 2007 Jan-Feb;9(1):1-7
pubmed: 17605194
J Arthroplasty. 2022 Jul;37(7S):S439-S443
pubmed: 35288245
Arthroplast Today. 2022 Oct 12;18:57-62
pubmed: 36262668
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014 Feb;472(2):455-63
pubmed: 23963704
J Arthroplasty. 2021 Jan;36(1):222-230
pubmed: 32800438
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013 Jul;471(7):2245-52
pubmed: 23412730
Orthopadie (Heidelb). 2022 Aug;51(8):646-651
pubmed: 35798869
J Arthroplasty. 2019 Jan;34(1):1-2
pubmed: 30527340
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2021 Dec 1;479(12):2621-2629
pubmed: 34237041
Hip Int. 2015 Jan-Feb;25(1):91-7
pubmed: 25198299
J Biol Regul Homeost Agents. ;31(4 suppl 1):83-89
pubmed: 29186943
Hip Int. 2019 Nov;29(6):584-596
pubmed: 30595060
Rev Esp Cir Ortop Traumatol. 2022 Nov-Dec;66(6):T59-T66
pubmed: 35853602
Int Wound J. 2017 Dec;14(6):1262-1268
pubmed: 28782201
J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2014 Sep;22(9):595-603
pubmed: 25157041
Arthroplast Today. 2022 Jul 31;17:1-8
pubmed: 35942107
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1978 Mar;60(2):217-20
pubmed: 641088
J Arthroplasty. 2019 Aug;34(8):1723-1730
pubmed: 31003782
Instr Course Lect. 2004;53:141-7
pubmed: 15116608