Efficacy and Treatment Satisfaction of Different Systemic Therapies in Children and Adolescents with Moderate-to-Severe Atopic Dermatitis: A Real-World Study.
adolescents
atopic dermatitis
children
dupilumab
real-world data
upadacitinib
Journal
Journal of clinical medicine
ISSN: 2077-0383
Titre abrégé: J Clin Med
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101606588
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 Feb 2023
01 Feb 2023
Historique:
received:
05
01
2023
revised:
19
01
2023
accepted:
29
01
2023
entrez:
11
2
2023
pubmed:
12
2
2023
medline:
12
2
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
For the treatment of moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis in children and adolescents, the monoclonal antibody dupilumab and the selective JAK-1 inhibitor upadacitinib are two modern systemic therapies approved for long-term treatment. Both drugs have demonstrated high efficacy in randomized controlled trials, although evidence from real-world data in the pediatric population is limited. In a prospective analysis over 24 weeks, we investigated the efficacy, safety and treatment satisfaction of both systemic therapies in 23 patients (16 patients treated with dupilumab; 7 patients treated with upadacitinib). The median age of the patients was 16 years, with a median EASI of 18.8. A significant improvement in the EASI, VAS-itch, CDLQI, POEM and DFIQ from baseline to week 24 was demonstrated for both treatment options. No significant difference was observed between dupilumab and upadacitinib in any of the assessed scores. Less adverse events were recorded in the real-world setting compared with clinical trials. Our results confirm the efficacy and safety of dupilumab and upadacitinib as equivalent treatment options in children and adolescents in a real-world setting.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36769820
pii: jcm12031175
doi: 10.3390/jcm12031175
pmc: PMC9917393
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Références
Paediatr Drugs. 2022 Nov;24(6):671-678
pubmed: 36028611
Acta Derm Venereol. 2020 Jun 9;100(12):adv00163
pubmed: 32412647
Dermatol Ther. 2022 Jan;35(1):e15192
pubmed: 34743366
JAMA Dermatol. 2020 Jan 1;156(1):44-56
pubmed: 31693077
Dermatol Ther. 2022 Aug;35(8):e15588
pubmed: 35569129
Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). 2021 Aug;11(4):1415-1422
pubmed: 34046851
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2022 Sep;36(9):1497-1498
pubmed: 35398945
Br J Dermatol. 2004 Feb;150(2):284-90
pubmed: 14996099
Lancet. 2021 Jun 5;397(10290):2151-2168
pubmed: 34023008
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2015 May;29(5):854-7
pubmed: 25444256
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2021 Sep;35(9):1797-1810
pubmed: 33991374
JAMA Dermatol. 2021 Sep 01;157(9):1047-1055
pubmed: 34347860
JAMA Dermatol. 2022 Apr 1;158(4):404-413
pubmed: 35262646
J Dtsch Dermatol Ges. 2019 Apr;17(4):433-440
pubmed: 30958934
J Dermatol. 2022 Nov;49(11):1158-1167
pubmed: 35986480
Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). 2019 Dec;9(4):799-805
pubmed: 31641952
Children (Basel). 2019 Dec 02;6(12):
pubmed: 31810362
Am J Clin Dermatol. 2019 Apr;20(2):181-192
pubmed: 30536048
Acta Derm Venereol. 2017 Jan 4;97(1):86-90
pubmed: 27305646
J Am Acad Dermatol. 2020 Nov;83(5):1282-1293
pubmed: 32574587
Lancet. 2021 Jun 5;397(10290):2169-2181
pubmed: 34023009
Drugs R D. 2022 Sep;22(3):245-252
pubmed: 35922713
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2022 Sep;36(9):1409-1431
pubmed: 35980214
N Engl J Med. 2016 Dec 15;375(24):2335-2348
pubmed: 27690741
Asia Pac Allergy. 2016 Oct;6(4):213-219
pubmed: 27803881
Lancet. 2016 Mar 12;387(10023):1109-1122
pubmed: 26377142
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2022 Oct;36(10):e832-e833
pubmed: 35680538
J Cutan Med Surg. 2017 May/Jun;21(3):227-236
pubmed: 28300440