Harmonization of maternal balanced energy-protein supplementation studies for individual participant data (IPD) meta-analyses - finding and creating similarities in variables and data collection.
Antenatal
Balanced energy-protein supplementation
IPD meta-analysis
Lactation
Maternal and neonatal outcomes
Micronutrients
Preconception
Pregnancy
Journal
BMC pregnancy and childbirth
ISSN: 1471-2393
Titre abrégé: BMC Pregnancy Childbirth
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100967799
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
11 Feb 2023
11 Feb 2023
Historique:
received:
21
07
2022
accepted:
09
01
2023
entrez:
11
2
2023
pubmed:
12
2
2023
medline:
15
2
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Public health and clinical recommendations are established from systematic reviews and retrospective meta-analyses combining effect sizes, traditionally, from aggregate data and more recently, using individual participant data (IPD) of published studies. However, trials often have outcomes and other meta-data that are not defined and collected in a standardized way, making meta-analysis problematic. IPD meta-analysis can only partially fix the limitations of traditional, retrospective, aggregate meta-analysis; prospective meta-analysis further reduces the problems. We developed an initiative including seven clinical intervention studies of balanced energy-protein (BEP) supplementation during pregnancy and/or lactation that are being conducted (or recently concluded) in Burkina Faso, Ethiopia, India, Nepal, and Pakistan to test the effect of BEP on infant and maternal outcomes. These studies were commissioned after an expert consultation that designed recommendations for a BEP product for use among pregnant and lactating women in low- and middle-income countries. The initiative goal is to harmonize variables across studies to facilitate IPD meta-analyses on closely aligned data, commonly called prospective meta-analysis. Our objective here is to describe the process of harmonizing variable definitions and prioritizing research questions. A two-day workshop of investigators, content experts, and advisors was held in February 2020 and harmonization activities continued thereafter. Efforts included a range of activities from examining protocols and data collection plans to discussing best practices within field constraints. Prior to harmonization, there were many similar outcomes and variables across studies, such as newborn anthropometry, gestational age, and stillbirth, however, definitions and protocols differed. As well, some measurements were being conducted in several but not all studies, such as food insecurity. Through the harmonization process, we came to consensus on important shared variables, particularly outcomes, added new measurements, and improved protocols across studies. We have fostered extensive communication between investigators from different studies, and importantly, created a large set of harmonized variable definitions within a prospective meta-analysis framework. We expect this initiative will improve reporting within each study in addition to providing opportunities for a series of IPD meta-analyses.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Public health and clinical recommendations are established from systematic reviews and retrospective meta-analyses combining effect sizes, traditionally, from aggregate data and more recently, using individual participant data (IPD) of published studies. However, trials often have outcomes and other meta-data that are not defined and collected in a standardized way, making meta-analysis problematic. IPD meta-analysis can only partially fix the limitations of traditional, retrospective, aggregate meta-analysis; prospective meta-analysis further reduces the problems.
METHODS
METHODS
We developed an initiative including seven clinical intervention studies of balanced energy-protein (BEP) supplementation during pregnancy and/or lactation that are being conducted (or recently concluded) in Burkina Faso, Ethiopia, India, Nepal, and Pakistan to test the effect of BEP on infant and maternal outcomes. These studies were commissioned after an expert consultation that designed recommendations for a BEP product for use among pregnant and lactating women in low- and middle-income countries. The initiative goal is to harmonize variables across studies to facilitate IPD meta-analyses on closely aligned data, commonly called prospective meta-analysis. Our objective here is to describe the process of harmonizing variable definitions and prioritizing research questions. A two-day workshop of investigators, content experts, and advisors was held in February 2020 and harmonization activities continued thereafter. Efforts included a range of activities from examining protocols and data collection plans to discussing best practices within field constraints. Prior to harmonization, there were many similar outcomes and variables across studies, such as newborn anthropometry, gestational age, and stillbirth, however, definitions and protocols differed. As well, some measurements were being conducted in several but not all studies, such as food insecurity. Through the harmonization process, we came to consensus on important shared variables, particularly outcomes, added new measurements, and improved protocols across studies.
DISCUSSION
CONCLUSIONS
We have fostered extensive communication between investigators from different studies, and importantly, created a large set of harmonized variable definitions within a prospective meta-analysis framework. We expect this initiative will improve reporting within each study in addition to providing opportunities for a series of IPD meta-analyses.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36774497
doi: 10.1186/s12884-023-05366-2
pii: 10.1186/s12884-023-05366-2
pmc: PMC9919738
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
107Subventions
Organisme : NICHD NIH HHS
ID : K23 HD091390
Pays : United States
Organisme : Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation
ID : INV-022373
Pays : United States
Investigateurs
Grace J Chan
(GJ)
Mulatu M Derebe
(MM)
Fred Van Dyk
(F)
Luke C Mullany
(LC)
Daniel Erchick
(D)
Michelle S Eglovitch
(MS)
Chunling Lu
(C)
Krysten North
(K)
Ingrid E Olson
(IE)
Nebiyou Fasil
(N)
Workagegnehu T Kidane
(WT)
Fisseha Shiferie
(F)
Tigest Shiferaw
(T)
Fitsum Tsegaye
(F)
Sitota Tsegaye
(S)
Sheila Isanaka
(S)
Rose L Molina
(RL)
Michele D Stojanov
(MD)
Blair J Wylie
(BJ)
Amare W Tadesse
(AW)
Lieven Huybregts
(L)
Laeticia C Toe
(LC)
Alemayehu Argaw
(A)
Giles Hanley-Cook
(G)
Rupali Dewan
(R)
Pratima Mittal
(P)
Harish Chellani
(H)
Tsering P Lama
(TP)
Benazir Baloch
(B)
Mihaela A Ciulei
(MA)
Informations de copyright
© 2023. The Author(s).
Références
Matern Child Nutr. 2022 Jul;18(3):e13336
pubmed: 35263004
Popul Health Metr. 2021 Sep 22;19(1):35
pubmed: 34551768
Matern Child Nutr. 2015 Oct;11(4):415-32
pubmed: 25857334
N Engl J Med. 2011 Mar 3;364(9):852-60
pubmed: 21366476
Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Jul;124(1):150-153
pubmed: 24901267
BMJ. 2017 Nov 29;359:j5237
pubmed: 29187358
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Dec 11;18(1):953
pubmed: 30537958
BMC Pediatr. 2011 Jan 17;11:6
pubmed: 21235822
Am J Clin Nutr. 2021 Apr 6;113(4):884-894
pubmed: 33564825
J Nutr. 2016 Aug;146(8):1601-8
pubmed: 27412269
J Nutr. 2018 Mar 1;148(3):445-452
pubmed: 29546306
BMJ Paediatr Open. 2022 Jan;6(1):
pubmed: 36053580
Hypertension. 2014 Jun;63(6):1293-301
pubmed: 24688121
Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2012 Jul;26 Suppl 1:178-90
pubmed: 22742610
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Jun 02;(6):CD000032
pubmed: 26031211
Trials. 2020 Jan 31;21(1):127
pubmed: 32005294
JAMA. 2020 Oct 6;324(13):1330-1341
pubmed: 32876694
J Obstet Gynaecol. 2008 Jan;28(1):36-43
pubmed: 18259896
Food Nutr Bull. 2004 Mar;25(1 Suppl):S15-26
pubmed: 15069916
Matern Child Nutr. 2021 Jan;17(1):e13067
pubmed: 32757351
Nutrients. 2019 Feb 20;11(2):
pubmed: 30791647
Lancet. 2016 Apr 2;387(10026):1377-1396
pubmed: 27115820
PLoS Med. 2022 May 13;19(5):e1004002
pubmed: 35560315
Clin Infect Dis. 2014 Nov 1;59 Suppl 4:S193-206
pubmed: 25305287
Int J Obes (Lond). 2022 Oct;46(10):1867-1874
pubmed: 35927469
Matern Child Nutr. 2021 Jul;17(3):e13134
pubmed: 33405368
Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2016 May;12(5):274-89
pubmed: 27032981
Matern Child Nutr. 2022 Apr;18(2):e13306
pubmed: 34908227
BMJ Open. 2021 Mar 24;11(3):e038393
pubmed: 33762226
PLoS One. 2014 Jun 16;9(6):e99111
pubmed: 24932522
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2014 Feb;93(2):127-31
pubmed: 24382256
PLoS One. 2021 Aug 18;16(8):e0256188
pubmed: 34407128
Trials. 2020 Sep 1;21(1):756
pubmed: 32873314
Br J Psychiatry. 1987 Jun;150:782-6
pubmed: 3651732
Trials. 2022 Jan 3;23(1):2
pubmed: 34980232
Trials. 2021 Jan 22;22(1):78
pubmed: 33482883
BMJ Glob Health. 2017 Sep 22;2(3):e000389
pubmed: 29018583
J Nutr. 2021 Dec 3;151(12):3831-3840
pubmed: 34494113
BMJ. 2019 Oct 9;367:l5342
pubmed: 31597627
Nutrients. 2020 Feb 19;12(2):
pubmed: 32092933
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Nov 09;11:CD010578
pubmed: 30480324
J Gen Intern Med. 2001 Sep;16(9):606-13
pubmed: 11556941