Ovarian Real-World International Consortium (ORWIC): A multicentre, real-world analysis of epithelial ovarian cancer treatment and outcomes.
Europe
chemotherapy
debulking surgery
epithelial ovarian cancer
real-world
treatment
Journal
Frontiers in oncology
ISSN: 2234-943X
Titre abrégé: Front Oncol
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101568867
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2023
2023
Historique:
received:
02
12
2022
accepted:
09
01
2023
entrez:
13
2
2023
pubmed:
14
2
2023
medline:
14
2
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Much drug development and published analysis for epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) focuses on early-line treatment. Full sequences of treatment from diagnosis to death and the impact of later lines of therapy are rarely studied. We describe the establishment of an international network of cancer centers configured to compare real-world treatment pathways in UK, Portugal, Germany, South Korea, France and Romania (the Ovarian Real-World International Consortium; ORWIC). 3344 patients diagnosed with EOC (2012-2018) were analysed using a common data model and hub and spoke programming approach applied to existing electronic medical records. Consistent definition of line of therapy between sites and an efficient approach to analysis within the limitations of local information governance was achieved. Median age of participants was 53-67 years old and 5-29% were ECOG >1. Between 62% and 84% of patients were diagnosed with late-stage disease (FIGO III-IV). Sites treating younger and fitter patients had higher rates of debulking surgery for those diagnosed at late stage than sites with older, more frail patients. At least 21% of patients treated with systemic anti-cancer therapy (SACT) had recurrent disease following second-line therapy (2L); up to 11 lines of SACT treatment were recorded for some patients. Platinum-based SACT was consistently used across sites at 1L, but choices at 2L varied, with hormone therapies commonly used in the UK and Portugal. The use (and type) of maintenance therapy following 1L also varied. Beyond 2L, there was little consensus between sites on treatment choice: trial compounds and unspecified combinations of other agents were common. Specific treatment sequences are reported up to 4L and the establishment of this network facilitates future analysis of comparative outcomes per line of treatment with the aim of optimizing available options for patients with recurrent EOC. In particular, this real-world network can be used to assess the growing use of PARP inhibitors. The real-world optimization of advanced line treatment will be especially important for patients not usually eligible for involvement with clinical trials. The resources to enable this analysis to be implemented elsewhere are supplied and the network will seek to grow in coverage of further sites.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36776297
doi: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1114435
pmc: PMC9911857
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
1114435Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2023 Cheeseman, Levick, Sopwith, Fenton, Nam, Kim, Lim, Martin, Frenel, Bocquet, Kubelac, Achimas-Cadariu, Vlad, Chevrier, Rouzier, Carton, Savva-Bordalo, Magalhães, Borges, Wolf, Becker, Niklas, Guergova-Kuras and Hall.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Authors BL, WS, HF, NN and MG-K were employed by IQVIA Oncology Evidence Network. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Références
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2021 Oct;155 Suppl 1:61-85
pubmed: 34669199
J Clin Oncol. 2014 May 1;32(13):1302-8
pubmed: 24637997
Future Oncol. 2018 Sep;14(21):2103-2113
pubmed: 29584456
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2012 Jan;21 Suppl 1:23-31
pubmed: 22262590
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2021 Feb;31(2):238-244
pubmed: 32540894
Anticancer Res. 2007 Jan-Feb;27(1B):611-7
pubmed: 17348450
Lancet Oncol. 2018 Aug;19(8):1012-1014
pubmed: 30026001
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2019 Jan 1;111(1):60-68
pubmed: 29718305
Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Feb;30(1):17-22
pubmed: 29176513
Gynecol Oncol. 2017 Feb;144(2):405-413
pubmed: 27931752
Ann Oncol. 2019 May 1;30(5):721-732
pubmed: 30887020
Ann Oncol. 2019 May 1;30(5):672-705
pubmed: 31046081
Springerplus. 2016 Jul 28;5(1):1197
pubmed: 27516935
Ann Oncol. 2017 Apr 1;28(4):727-732
pubmed: 27993805
N Engl J Med. 2021 Dec 2;385(23):2123-2131
pubmed: 34874631
Cancer Biol Med. 2015 Dec;12(4):292-301
pubmed: 26779366
Lancet. 2019 Mar 23;393(10177):1240-1253
pubmed: 30910306
Clin Cancer Res. 2020 Aug 15;26(16):4268-4279
pubmed: 32398324
Lancet Oncol. 2015 Aug;16(8):928-36
pubmed: 26115797
Ann Surg Oncol. 2006 Dec;13(12):1702-10
pubmed: 17009163
Nat Med. 2013 Nov;19(11):1381-8
pubmed: 24202391
N Engl J Med. 2012 Apr 12;366(15):1382-92
pubmed: 22452356
Lancet Oncol. 2017 Jun;18(6):779-791
pubmed: 28438473
N Engl J Med. 2011 Dec 29;365(26):2473-83
pubmed: 22204724
J Clin Oncol. 2012 Jun 10;30(17):2039-45
pubmed: 22529265
J Clin Oncol. 2020 Apr 10;38(11):1164-1174
pubmed: 32073956
Ann Oncol. 2020 Sep;31(9):1148-1159
pubmed: 32569725
J Ovarian Res. 2019 Nov 4;12(1):103
pubmed: 31685032
Ann Oncol. 2020 Dec;31(12):1606-1622
pubmed: 33004253
BMJ. 2020 Nov 9;371:m3773
pubmed: 33168565
Gynecol Oncol. 2015 Oct;139(1):10-6
pubmed: 26271155
Lancet Oncol. 2017 Sep;18(9):1274-1284
pubmed: 28754483