Diagnostic performance of dynamic 3D magnetic resonance angiography in daily practice for the detection of intracranial arteriovenous shunts in patients with non-traumatic intracranial hemorrhage.
accuracy
arteriovenous shunt
digital subtraction angiography
dynamic magnetic resonance angiography
intracerebral hemorrhage
sensitivity
specificity
vascular malformation
Journal
Frontiers in neurology
ISSN: 1664-2295
Titre abrégé: Front Neurol
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101546899
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2022
2022
Historique:
received:
31
10
2022
accepted:
19
12
2022
entrez:
13
2
2023
pubmed:
14
2
2023
medline:
14
2
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Identification of treatable causes of intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) such as intracranial arteriovenous shunt is crucial to prevent recurrence. However, diagnostic approaches vary considerably across centers, partly because of limited knowledge of the diagnostic performance of first-line vascular imaging techniques. We assessed the diagnostic performance of dynamic three-dimensional magnetic resonance angiography (dynamic 3D MRA) in daily practice to detect intracranial arteriovenous shunts in ICH patients against subsequent digital subtraction angiography (DSA) as reference standard. We reviewed all adult patients who underwent first-line dynamic 3D MRA and subsequent DSA for non-traumatic ICH between January 2016 and September 2021 in a tertiary center. Sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive and negative predictive values of dynamic 3D MRA for the detection of intracranial arteriovenous shunt were calculated with DSA as reference standard. Among 104 included patients, 29 (27.9%) had a DSA-confirmed arteriovenous shunt [19 pial arteriovenous malformations, 10 dural arteriovenous fistulae; median onset-to-DSA: 17 (IQR: 3-88) days]. The sensitivity and specificity of dynamic 3D MRA [median onset-to-dynamic 3D MRA: 14 (3-101) h] for the detection of intracranial arteriovenous shunt were 66% (95% CI: 48-83) and 91% (95% CI: 84-97), respectively. The corresponding accuracy, positive and negative predictive values were 84% (95% CI: 77-91), 73% (95% CI: 56-90), and 87% (95% CI: 80-95), respectively. This study suggests that although first-line evaluation with dynamic 3D MRA may be helpful for the detection of intracranial arteriovenous shunts in patients with ICH, additional vascular imaging work-up should not be withheld if dynamic 3D MRA is negative. Comparative prospective studies are needed to determine the best imaging strategy to diagnose arteriovenous shunts after non-traumatic ICH.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36776575
doi: 10.3389/fneur.2022.1085806
pmc: PMC9911434
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
1085806Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2023 Roumi, Ben Hassen, Hmeydia, Posener, Pallud, Sharshar, Calvet, Mas, Baron, Oppenheim, Naggara and Turc.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
GT received lecturing fees from Guerbet France. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Références
J Neuroimaging. 2013 Oct;23(4):514-7
pubmed: 23317169
Stroke. 2022 Jul;53(7):e282-e361
pubmed: 35579034
Radiology. 2003 May;227(2):522-8
pubmed: 12637677
Lancet. 2018 Oct 6;392(10154):1257-1268
pubmed: 30319113
Neuroradiology. 2020 Mar;62(3):273-281
pubmed: 31901972
Eur Radiol. 2006 Mar;16(3):583-91
pubmed: 16220210
J Clin Neurosci. 2010 May;17(5):601-5
pubmed: 20227278
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2019 Sep;40(9):1498-1504
pubmed: 31395664
Acta Radiol. 2011 May 1;52(4):442-7
pubmed: 21498290
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2016 Oct;44(4):834-45
pubmed: 26970348
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2012 Jun;33(6):1095-101
pubmed: 22300925
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Sep 01;(9):CD009372
pubmed: 25177839
Neurology. 2006 May 9;66(9):1350-5
pubmed: 16682666
PLoS One. 2016 Jun 08;11(6):e0156992
pubmed: 27275863
Eur Radiol. 2019 Nov;29(11):5961-5970
pubmed: 31089848
Stroke. 2010 Apr;41(4):685-90
pubmed: 20167915
Magn Reson Med. 1998 Oct;40(4):571-81
pubmed: 9771574
BMJ. 2015 Nov 09;351:h5762
pubmed: 26553142
Magn Reson Med Sci. 2020 Dec 1;19(4):294-309
pubmed: 31761840
Stroke. 1999 Apr;30(4):905-15
pubmed: 10187901
Lancet Neurol. 2021 Oct;20(10):795-820
pubmed: 34487721
BMJ. 2015 Oct 28;351:h5527
pubmed: 26511519
Stroke. 2022 Jan;53(1):185-193
pubmed: 34517772
Neuroradiology. 2012 Jul;54(7):673-80
pubmed: 21918851