Systematic review and meta-analysis protocol for development and validation of a prediction model for gestational hypertension in Africa.
Africa
Prediction model
gestational hypertension
validation
Journal
SAGE open medicine
ISSN: 2050-3121
Titre abrégé: SAGE Open Med
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101624744
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2023
2023
Historique:
received:
20
06
2022
accepted:
10
01
2023
entrez:
13
2
2023
pubmed:
14
2
2023
medline:
14
2
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Examining the development and validation of predictive models for gestational hypertension, evaluating the validity of the methodology, and investigating predictors typically employed in such models. Systematic review and meta-analysis protocol. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis Protocols (PRISMA-P) guideline will be used to carry out the study procedure. Using the key phrases "Gestational hypertension," "prediction, risk prediction," and "validation," a full systematic search will be conducted in PubMed/MEDLINE, Hinari, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar. The methodological quality of the included studies will be evaluated using the prediction model risk of bias assessment tool. The CHARMS (checklist for critical evaluation and data extraction for systematic reviews of prediction modeling research) will be used to extract the data, and STATA 16 will be used to analyze it. The degree of study heterogeneity will be assessed using Cochrane I A subgroup analysis will be performed to reduce the variance between primary studies. To examine the impact of individual studies on the pooled estimates, a sensitivity analysis will be performed. The funnel plot test and Egger's statistical test will be used to assess the small study effect. The presence of a modest study effect is shown by Egger's test (
Identifiants
pubmed: 36778201
doi: 10.1177/20503121231153508
pii: 10.1177_20503121231153508
pmc: PMC9912540
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
20503121231153508Informations de copyright
© The Author(s) 2023.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Références
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2022 Jun 21;79(24):2401-2411
pubmed: 35710191
Ann Intern Med. 2019 Jan 1;170(1):W1-W33
pubmed: 30596876
Lancet. 2011 Jan 15;377(9761):219-27
pubmed: 21185591
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Jan;214(1):79-90.e36
pubmed: 26070707
Am J Perinatol. 2014 Dec;31(12):1049-56
pubmed: 24705967
PLoS Med. 2015 Oct 13;12(10):e1001886
pubmed: 26461078
J Clin Epidemiol. 2006 Oct;59(10):1092-101
pubmed: 16980150
BMJ. 2013 Feb 05;346:e5595
pubmed: 23386360
J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2019 Apr;21(4):479-488
pubmed: 30848083
J Med Libr Assoc. 2018 Oct;106(4):420-431
pubmed: 30271283
BMJ Open. 2017 Jan 16;7(1):e012670
pubmed: 28093430
Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2002 Apr;14(2):119-25
pubmed: 11914688
BMJ. 2017 Jan 5;356:i6460
pubmed: 28057641
Hypertens Res. 2021 Apr;44(4):417-425
pubmed: 33060833
Hormones (Athens). 2015 Apr-Jun;14(2):211-23
pubmed: 26158653
Pregnancy Hypertens. 2014 Apr;4(2):97-104
pubmed: 26104417
Control Clin Trials. 1986 Sep;7(3):177-88
pubmed: 3802833
Fetal Diagn Ther. 2012;31(3):141-6
pubmed: 22441437
Ann Intern Med. 2015 Jan 6;162(1):W1-73
pubmed: 25560730
BMJ. 2015 Mar 16;350:h870
pubmed: 25775931
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Oct 3;10:ED000142
pubmed: 31643080
BMJ. 1997 Sep 13;315(7109):629-34
pubmed: 9310563