Multiphasic value biases in fast-paced decisions.
decision making
electroencephalography
human
neuroscience
sequential sampling models
Journal
eLife
ISSN: 2050-084X
Titre abrégé: Elife
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101579614
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
13 02 2023
13 02 2023
Historique:
received:
19
02
2021
accepted:
04
01
2023
entrez:
13
2
2023
pubmed:
14
2
2023
medline:
16
2
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Perceptual decisions are biased toward higher-value options when overall gains can be improved. When stimuli demand immediate reactions, the neurophysiological decision process dynamically evolves through distinct phases of growing anticipation, detection, and discrimination, but how value biases are exerted through these phases remains unknown. Here, by parsing motor preparation dynamics in human electrophysiology, we uncovered a multiphasic pattern of countervailing biases operating in speeded decisions. Anticipatory preparation of higher-value actions began earlier, conferring a 'starting point' advantage at stimulus onset, but the delayed preparation of lower-value actions was steeper, conferring a value-opposed buildup-rate bias. This, in turn, was countered by a transient deflection toward the higher-value action evoked by stimulus detection. A neurally-constrained process model featuring anticipatory urgency, biased detection, and accumulation of growing stimulus-discriminating evidence, successfully captured both behavior and motor preparation dynamics. Thus, an intricate interplay of distinct biasing mechanisms serves to prioritise time-constrained perceptual decisions.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36779966
doi: 10.7554/eLife.67711
pii: 67711
pmc: PMC9925050
doi:
pii:
Banques de données
figshare
['10.25452/figshare.plus.c.6338693.v1']
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Informations de copyright
© 2023, Corbett et al.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
EC, LM, CJ, SK No competing interests declared, RO Reviewing editor, eLife
Références
Psychol Rev. 2021 Jan;128(1):160-186
pubmed: 32852976
Psychon Bull Rev. 2015 Feb;22(1):38-53
pubmed: 24928091
Psychon Bull Rev. 2004 Feb;11(1):192-6
pubmed: 15117008
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2004 Jun;133(2):261-82
pubmed: 15149253
Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1981 Mar;51(3):253-64
pubmed: 6163614
Nat Commun. 2018 Sep 7;9(1):3627
pubmed: 30194305
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2009 Dec;35(6):1865-97
pubmed: 19968441
J Neurosci. 2017 Nov 1;37(44):10725-10737
pubmed: 28982706
Trends Neurosci. 2018 Nov;41(11):838-852
pubmed: 30007746
J Neurosci. 2013 Dec 11;33(50):19434-41
pubmed: 24336710
PLoS Comput Biol. 2009 Feb;5(2):e1000284
pubmed: 19214201
Elife. 2019 Nov 27;8:
pubmed: 31774396
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2017 Jun;146(6):776-805
pubmed: 28406682
Psychol Bull. 1991 Mar;109(2):163-203
pubmed: 2034749
Clin Neurophysiol. 2006 Feb;117(2):348-68
pubmed: 16356767
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2021 Aug;150(8):1528-1555
pubmed: 33764107
Percept Psychophys. 2006 Feb;68(2):194-207
pubmed: 16773893
Nat Commun. 2016 Nov 24;7:13526
pubmed: 27882927
J Neurosci. 2012 Feb 15;32(7):2335-43
pubmed: 22396408
Psychol Rev. 2022 Mar;129(2):235-267
pubmed: 34410765
J Neurosci. 2011 Apr 27;31(17):6339-52
pubmed: 21525274
Psychon Bull Rev. 2020 Oct;27(5):882-910
pubmed: 32514800
Behav Res Methods. 2020 Feb;52(1):193-206
pubmed: 30924107
Psychol Rev. 2009 Apr;116(2):283-317
pubmed: 19348543
J Neurosci. 2012 Mar 14;32(11):3612-28
pubmed: 22423085
Trends Neurosci. 2010 Jan;33(1):10-6
pubmed: 19819033
Cogn Psychol. 2015 May;78:148-74
pubmed: 25909766
Nat Hum Behav. 2021 Apr;5(4):467-481
pubmed: 33318661
Nat Neurosci. 2012 Dec;15(12):1729-35
pubmed: 23103963
Psychon Bull Rev. 2002 Sep;9(3):438-81
pubmed: 12412886
J Neurosci. 2002 Nov 1;22(21):9475-89
pubmed: 12417672
Elife. 2019 Jul 02;8:
pubmed: 31264959
PLoS One. 2010 Feb 19;5(2):e9308
pubmed: 20174574
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2014 Mar;40(2):385-398
pubmed: 24245536
Elife. 2014 May 27;3:
pubmed: 24867216
Mem Cognit. 2004 Oct;32(7):1206-20
pubmed: 15813501
Neuron. 2014 Mar 19;81(6):1401-1416
pubmed: 24656257
Neuroimage. 2021 Sep;238:118265
pubmed: 34146710
J Neurosci. 2020 Sep 16;40(38):7326-7342
pubmed: 32839233
J Cogn Neurosci. 2016 Oct;28(10):1501-21
pubmed: 27315275
Neuroimage. 2013 Oct 1;79:394-403
pubmed: 23664943
Psychon Bull Rev. 2019 Feb;26(1):127-162
pubmed: 29968205
Psychon Bull Rev. 1995 Jun;2(2):174-207
pubmed: 24203654
Cogn Psychol. 2008 Nov;57(3):153-78
pubmed: 18243170
Curr Biol. 2018 Mar 5;28(5):795-802.e6
pubmed: 29456147
Neural Comput. 2008 Apr;20(4):873-922
pubmed: 18085991
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1988 Aug;14(3):331-44
pubmed: 2971764
Spat Vis. 1997;10(4):433-6
pubmed: 9176952
Front Hum Neurosci. 2010 Nov 17;4:208
pubmed: 21267421
Trends Neurosci. 2004 Mar;27(3):161-8
pubmed: 15036882
Elife. 2023 Feb 13;12:
pubmed: 36779966
PLoS One. 2014 Mar 13;9(3):e90943
pubmed: 24625827
J Neurosci. 2015 Aug 05;35(31):10989-1011
pubmed: 26245962
J Neurosci. 2013 Jan 23;33(4):1400-10
pubmed: 23345216
Curr Biol. 2009 Sep 29;19(18):1581-5
pubmed: 19747828
Psychol Rev. 2001 Jul;108(3):550-92
pubmed: 11488378
Nat Neurosci. 2008 Jun;11(6):693-702
pubmed: 18488024
J Neurosci. 2003 Jan 15;23(2):632-51
pubmed: 12533623
J Neurosci. 2015 Feb 11;35(6):2476-84
pubmed: 25673842
J Neurosci Methods. 2004 Mar 15;134(1):9-21
pubmed: 15102499
Nat Neurosci. 2010 Mar;13(3):379-85
pubmed: 20098418