Patterns of practice in the diagnosis, dietary counselling and follow-up of patients with celiac disease- A patient-based survey.
Adherence
Celiac disease
Diagnosis
Dietary counselling
Follow-up
Gluten
Serology
Small intestine
Journal
Indian journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Indian Society of Gastroenterology
ISSN: 0975-0711
Titre abrégé: Indian J Gastroenterol
Pays: India
ID NLM: 8409436
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
02 2023
02 2023
Historique:
received:
25
06
2022
accepted:
23
08
2022
medline:
28
3
2023
pubmed:
14
2
2023
entrez:
13
2
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The pattern of practice regarding the diagnosis, dietary counselling and follow-up of patients with celiac disease (CeD) varies between practice to practice. A web-based questionnaire based on review of literature, group discussions and expert group meetings was developed to understand the practice of CeD in India. The questionnaire was administered through social media (WhatsApp) to 18 Indian celiac support groups comprising 2980 patients with CeD. Overall, 970 (32.5%) patients responded to the questionnaire (median age: 21 years; females 63.9%). While 679 (71.1%) patients were diagnosed based on a combination of serology and biopsy, 214 (22.4%) were diagnosed based on serology alone. After diagnosis, 875 (91%) patients were counselled initially by physician and only 585 (61%) were referred to a dietician for dietary counselling. In a majority of cases, the time spent by doctors and dietitians during first counselling was between 10 and 20 minutes only. After first counselling, 191 (20%) and 355 (37.3%) patients did not re-visit the physician and the dietitian, respectively. Among those who followed up, structured follow-up was conducted in only 515 (53.8%) patients. Overall, 232 (24.3%) patients were self-monitoring their serological parameters, while 495 (51.8%) patients did not receive a formal assessment of dietary adherence during follow-up. The practice of diagnosis, dietary counselling and follow-up of patients with CeD in India is not as per standard guidelines. Most of the patients are not referred to a dietitian. There is a need for reinforcement of guidelines for proper care and management of patients with CeD.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
The pattern of practice regarding the diagnosis, dietary counselling and follow-up of patients with celiac disease (CeD) varies between practice to practice.
METHODS
A web-based questionnaire based on review of literature, group discussions and expert group meetings was developed to understand the practice of CeD in India. The questionnaire was administered through social media (WhatsApp) to 18 Indian celiac support groups comprising 2980 patients with CeD.
RESULTS
Overall, 970 (32.5%) patients responded to the questionnaire (median age: 21 years; females 63.9%). While 679 (71.1%) patients were diagnosed based on a combination of serology and biopsy, 214 (22.4%) were diagnosed based on serology alone. After diagnosis, 875 (91%) patients were counselled initially by physician and only 585 (61%) were referred to a dietician for dietary counselling. In a majority of cases, the time spent by doctors and dietitians during first counselling was between 10 and 20 minutes only. After first counselling, 191 (20%) and 355 (37.3%) patients did not re-visit the physician and the dietitian, respectively. Among those who followed up, structured follow-up was conducted in only 515 (53.8%) patients. Overall, 232 (24.3%) patients were self-monitoring their serological parameters, while 495 (51.8%) patients did not receive a formal assessment of dietary adherence during follow-up.
CONCLUSION
The practice of diagnosis, dietary counselling and follow-up of patients with CeD in India is not as per standard guidelines. Most of the patients are not referred to a dietitian. There is a need for reinforcement of guidelines for proper care and management of patients with CeD.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36780094
doi: 10.1007/s12664-022-01296-7
pii: 10.1007/s12664-022-01296-7
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
88-95Informations de copyright
© 2023. Indian Society of Gastroenterology.
Références
Parzanese I, Qehajaj D, Patrinicola F, et al. Celiac disease: from pathophysiology to treatment. World J Gastrointest Pathophysiol. 2017;8:27–38.
Singh P, Arora A, Strand TA, et al. Global prevalence of celiac disease: systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018;16:823–36.e2.
Lebwohl B, Rubio-Tapia A. Epidemiology, presentation, and diagnosis of celiac disease. Gastroenterology. 2021;160:63–75.
doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2020.06.098
pubmed: 32950520
King JA, Jeong J, Underwood FE, et al. Incidence of celiac disease is increasing over time: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Gastroenterol. 2020;115:507–25.
Leffler DA, Green PHR, Fasano A. Extraintestinal manifestations of coeliac disease. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2015;12:561–71.
doi: 10.1038/nrgastro.2015.131
pubmed: 26260366
Ludvigsson JF, Leffler DA, Bai JC, et al. The Oslo definitions for coeliac disease and related terms. Gut. 2013;62:43–52.
Pham-Short A, Donaghue KC, Ambler G, Phelan H, Twigg S, Craig ME. Screening for celiac disease in type 1 diabetes: a systematic review. Pediatrics. 2015;136:e170–6.
doi: 10.1542/peds.2014-2883
pubmed: 26077482
Singh P, Arora S, Lal S, Strand TA, Makharia GK. Risk of celiac disease in the first- and second-degree relatives of patients with celiac disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Gastroenterol. 2015;110:1539–48.
doi: 10.1038/ajg.2015.296
pubmed: 26416192
Quan J, Panaccione N, Jeong J, et al. Association between celiac disease and autism spectrum disorder: a systematic review. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2021;72:704–11.
Rubio-Tapia A, Kyle RA, Kaplan EL, et al. Increased prevalence and mortality in undiagnosed celiac disease. Gastroenterology. 2009;137:88–93.
Catassi C, Kryszak D, Bhatti B, et al. Natural history of celiac disease autoimmunity in a USA cohort followed since 1974. Ann Med. 2010;42:530–8.
Husby S, Koletzko S, Korponay-Szabó I, et al. European society Paediatric gastroenterology, hepatology and nutrition guidelines for diagnosing coeliac disease 2020. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2020;70:141–56.
Al-Toma A, Volta U, Auricchio R, et al. European Society for the Study of coeliac disease (ESsCD) guideline for coeliac disease and other gluten-related disorders. United Eur Gastroenterol J. 2019;7:583–613.
Bai JC, Ciacci C. World gastroenterology organisation global guidelines: Celiac disease February 2017. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2017;51:755–68.
ICMR guideline on diagnosis and management of celiac disease. Division of non communicable disease, Indian Council Of Medical Research, New Delhi, 2016.
Parfenov AI, Bykova SV, Sabel’nikova EA, et al. All-Russian consensus on diagnosis and treatment of celiac disease in children and adults. Ter Arkh. 2017;89:94–107.
Downey L, Houten R, Murch S, Longson D Guideline Development Group. Recognition, assessment, and management of coeliac disease: summary of updated NICE guidance. BMJ. 2015;351:h4513.
Ludvigsson JF, Bai JC, Biagi F, et al. Diagnosis and management of adult coeliac disease: guidelines from the British Society of Gastroenterology. Gut. 2014;63:1210–28.
Rubio-Tapia A, Hill ID, Kelly CP, Calderwood AH, Murray JA; American College of Gastroenterology. ACG clinical guidelines: diagnosis and management of celiac disease. Am J Gastroenterol. 2013;108:656–76.
National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Conference Statement on Celiac Disease, June 28-30, 2004. Gastroenterology. 2005;128 4 Suppl 1:S1–9.
Mehtab W, Singh N, Malhotra A, Makharia G. All that a physician should know about gluten-free diet. Indian J Gastroenterol. 2018;37:392–401.
doi: 10.1007/s12664-018-0895-0
pubmed: 30367395
Nelson M, Mendoza N, McGough N. A survey of provision of dietetic services for coeliac disease in the UK. J Hum Nutr Diet. 2007;20:403–11.
doi: 10.1111/j.1365-277X.2007.00813.x
pubmed: 17845374
Abu-Janb N, Jaana M. Facilitators and barriers to adherence to gluten-free diet among adults with celiac disease: a systematic review. J Hum Nutr Diet. 2020;33:786–810.
Malik I, Kumar K, Hussain H, Bhatia V, Sibal A, Malhotra S. Celiac disease: What the Indian pediatricians know about the disease. Indian J Gastroenterol. 2019;38:263–7.
Shergill S, Makharia GK. Awareness about celiac disease amongst physicians. Indian J Gastroenterol. 2017;36:327–9.
Rouvroye MD, Slottje P, van Gils T, et al. Insight in the diagnosis and treatment of coeliac disease in general practice: a survey and case vignette study among 106 general practitioners. Eur J Gen Pract. 27:313–9.
Holmes G, Ciacci C. The serological diagnosis of coeliac disease - a step forward. Gastroenterol Hepatol Bed Bench. 2018;11:209–15.
pubmed: 30013744
pmcid: 6040038
Mahadev S, Simpson S, Lebwohl B, Lewis SK, Tennyson CA, Green PH. Is dietitian use associated with celiac disease outcomes? Nutrients. 2013;5:1585–94.
Husby S, Murray JA, Katzka DA. AGA clinical practice update on diagnosis and monitoring of celiac disease-changing utility of serology and histologic measures: expert review. Gastroenterology. 2019;156:885–9.
doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2018.12.010
pubmed: 30578783
Goodyer L, Brown LJ, Crowley E. Celiac disease knowledge and practice of dietitians in rural New South Wales. Australia Food Nutr Sci. 2016;7:874–83.
Herman ML, Rubio-Tapia A, Lahr BD, Larson JJ, Van Dyke CT, Murray JA. Patients with celiac disease are not followed up adequately. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2012 ;10:893–-9.e1.
Butterworth JR, Banfield LM, Iqbal TH, Cooper BT. Factors relating to compliance with a gluten-free diet in patients with coeliac disease: comparison of white Caucasian and south Asian patients. Clin Nutr. 2004;23:1127–34.
doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2004.02.009
pubmed: 15380905
Hall NJ, Rubin GP, Charnock A. Intentional and inadvertent non-adherence in adult coeliac disease. A cross-sectional survey. Appetite. 2013;68:56–62.
doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2013.04.016
pubmed: 23623778
Silvester JA, Weiten D, Graff LA, Walker JR, Duerksen DR. Living gluten-free: adherence, knowledge, lifestyle adaptations and feelings towards a gluten-free diet. J Hum Nutr Diet. 2016;29:374–82.
doi: 10.1111/jhn.12316
pubmed: 25891988
Rostom A, Murray JA, Kagnoff MF. American Gastroenterological Association (AGA) institute technical review on the diagnosis and management of celiac disease. Gastroenterology. 2006;131:1981–2002.
doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2006.10.004
pubmed: 17087937
Cappell K, Taylor A, Johnson BH, et al. Healthcare resource utilization and costs in celiac disease: a US claims analysis. Am J Gastroenterol. 2020;115:1821–9.
Guandalini S, Tundia N, Thakkar R, Macaulay D, Essenmacher K, Fuldeore M. Direct costs in patients with celiac disease in the USA: a retrospective claims analysis. Dig Dis Sci. 2016;61:2823–30.
doi: 10.1007/s10620-016-4219-x
pubmed: 27417565
Long KH, Rubio-Tapia A, Wagie AE, et al. The economics of coeliac disease: a population-based study. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2010;32:261–9.
Violato M, Gray A, Papanicolas I, Ouellet M. Resource use and costs associated with coeliac disease before and after diagnosis in 3,646 cases: results of a UK primary care database analysis. PLoS One. 2012;7:e41308.
Heymann AD, Leshno M, Endevelt R, Shamir R. The high cost of celiac disease in an Israeli health maintenance organization. Health Econ Rev. 2013;3:23.