Prefrontal, parietal, and limbic condition-dependent differences in bipolar disorder: a large-scale meta-analysis of functional neuroimaging studies.
Journal
Molecular psychiatry
ISSN: 1476-5578
Titre abrégé: Mol Psychiatry
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9607835
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jul 2023
Jul 2023
Historique:
received:
16
02
2022
accepted:
19
01
2023
revised:
15
01
2023
medline:
1
11
2023
pubmed:
15
2
2023
entrez:
14
2
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Over the past few decades, neuroimaging research in Bipolar Disorder (BD) has identified neural differences underlying cognitive and emotional processing. However, substantial clinical and methodological heterogeneity present across neuroimaging experiments potentially hinders the identification of consistent neural biomarkers of BD. This meta-analysis aims to comprehensively reassess brain activation and connectivity in BD in order to identify replicable differences that converge across and within resting-state, cognitive, and emotional neuroimaging experiments. Neuroimaging experiments (using fMRI, PET, or arterial spin labeling) reporting whole-brain results in adults with BD and controls published from December 1999-June 18, 2019 were identified via PubMed search. Coordinates showing significant activation and/or connectivity differences between BD participants and controls during resting-state, emotional, or cognitive tasks were extracted. Four parallel, independent meta-analyses were calculated using the revised activation likelihood estimation algorithm: all experiment types, all resting-state experiments, all cognitive experiments, and all emotional experiments. To confirm reliability of identified clusters, two different meta-analytic significance tests were employed. 205 published studies yielding 506 individual neuroimaging experiments (150 resting-state, 134 cognitive, 222 emotional) comprising 5745 BD and 8023 control participants were included. Five regions survived both significance tests. Individuals with BD showed functional differences in the right posterior cingulate cortex during resting-state experiments, the left amygdala during emotional experiments, including those using a mixed (positive/negative) valence manipulation, and the left superior and right inferior parietal lobules during cognitive experiments, while hyperactivating the left medial orbitofrontal cortex during cognitive experiments. Across all experiments, there was convergence in the right caudate extending to the ventral striatum, surviving only one significance test. Our findings indicate reproducible localization of prefrontal, parietal, and limbic differences distinguishing BD from control participants that are condition-dependent, despite heterogeneity, and point towards a framework for identifying reproducible differences in BD that may guide diagnosis and treatment.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Over the past few decades, neuroimaging research in Bipolar Disorder (BD) has identified neural differences underlying cognitive and emotional processing. However, substantial clinical and methodological heterogeneity present across neuroimaging experiments potentially hinders the identification of consistent neural biomarkers of BD. This meta-analysis aims to comprehensively reassess brain activation and connectivity in BD in order to identify replicable differences that converge across and within resting-state, cognitive, and emotional neuroimaging experiments.
METHODS
METHODS
Neuroimaging experiments (using fMRI, PET, or arterial spin labeling) reporting whole-brain results in adults with BD and controls published from December 1999-June 18, 2019 were identified via PubMed search. Coordinates showing significant activation and/or connectivity differences between BD participants and controls during resting-state, emotional, or cognitive tasks were extracted. Four parallel, independent meta-analyses were calculated using the revised activation likelihood estimation algorithm: all experiment types, all resting-state experiments, all cognitive experiments, and all emotional experiments. To confirm reliability of identified clusters, two different meta-analytic significance tests were employed.
RESULTS
RESULTS
205 published studies yielding 506 individual neuroimaging experiments (150 resting-state, 134 cognitive, 222 emotional) comprising 5745 BD and 8023 control participants were included. Five regions survived both significance tests. Individuals with BD showed functional differences in the right posterior cingulate cortex during resting-state experiments, the left amygdala during emotional experiments, including those using a mixed (positive/negative) valence manipulation, and the left superior and right inferior parietal lobules during cognitive experiments, while hyperactivating the left medial orbitofrontal cortex during cognitive experiments. Across all experiments, there was convergence in the right caudate extending to the ventral striatum, surviving only one significance test.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
Our findings indicate reproducible localization of prefrontal, parietal, and limbic differences distinguishing BD from control participants that are condition-dependent, despite heterogeneity, and point towards a framework for identifying reproducible differences in BD that may guide diagnosis and treatment.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36782061
doi: 10.1038/s41380-023-01974-8
pii: 10.1038/s41380-023-01974-8
pmc: PMC10615766
doi:
Types de publication
Meta-Analysis
Systematic Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
2826-2838Informations de copyright
© 2023. The Author(s).
Références
Collins PY, Patel V, Joestl SS, March D, Insel TR, Daar AS, et al. Grand challenges in global mental health. Nature. 2011;475:27–30.
pubmed: 21734685
pmcid: 3173804
doi: 10.1038/475027a
Phillips ML, Swartz HA. A critical appraisal of neuroimaging studies of bipolar disorder: toward a new conceptualization of underlying neural circuitry and a road map for future research. Am J Psychiatry. 2014;171:829–43.
pubmed: 24626773
pmcid: 4119497
doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2014.13081008
Bellani M, Biagianti B, Zovetti N, Rossetti MG, Bressi C, Perlini C, et al. The effects of cognitive remediation on cognitive abilities and real-world functioning among people with bipolar disorder: A systematic review: Special Section on “Translational and Neuroscience Studies in Affective Disorders”. Section Editor, Maria Nobile MD, PhD. This Section of JAD focuses on the relevance of translational and neuroscience studies in providing a better understanding of the neural basis of affective disorders. The main aim is to briefly summaries relevant research findings in clinical neuroscience with particular regards to specific innovative topics in mood and anxiety disorders. J Affect Disord. 2019;257:691–7.
pubmed: 31377606
pmcid: 6711788
doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2019.07.059
Strakowski SM, Adler CM, Almeida J, Altshuler LL, Blumberg HP, Chang KD, et al. The functional neuroanatomy of bipolar disorder: a consensus model. Bipolar Disord. 2012;14:313–25.
pubmed: 22631617
doi: 10.1111/j.1399-5618.2012.01022.x
Chase HW, Phillips ML. Elucidating neural network functional connectivity abnormalities in bipolar disorder: toward a harmonized methodological approach. Biol Psychiatry Cogn Neurosci Neuroimaging. 2016;1:288–98.
pubmed: 27453953
pmcid: 4956344
Bertocci MA, Chase HW, Graur S, Stiffler R, Edmiston EK, Coffman BA, et al. The impact of targeted cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation on reward circuitry and affect in Bipolar Disorder. Mol Psychiatry. 2021;26:4137–45.
pubmed: 31664174
doi: 10.1038/s41380-019-0567-1
Alda M. The phenotypic spectra of bipolar disorder. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 2004;14:S94–9.
pubmed: 15142614
doi: 10.1016/j.euroneuro.2004.03.006
Angst J, Gerber-Werder R, Zuberbühler HU, Gamma A. Is bipolar I disorder heterogeneous? Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2004;254:82–91.
pubmed: 15146337
doi: 10.1007/s00406-004-0501-6
Kilbourne AM, Switzer G, Hyman K, Crowley-Matoka M, Fine MJ. Advancing health disparities research within the health care system: a conceptual framework. Am J Public Health. 2006;96:2113–21.
pubmed: 17077411
pmcid: 1698151
doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2005.077628
Williams JS, Walker RJ, Egede LE. Achieving equity in an evolving healthcare system: opportunities and challenges. Am J Med Sci. 2016;351:33–43.
pubmed: 26802756
pmcid: 4724388
doi: 10.1016/j.amjms.2015.10.012
Charney AW, Ruderfer DM, Stahl EA, Moran JL, Chambert K, Belliveau RA, et al. Evidence for genetic heterogeneity between clinical subtypes of bipolar disorder. Transl Psychiatry. 2017;7:e993–e993.
pubmed: 28072414
pmcid: 5545718
doi: 10.1038/tp.2016.242
Hozer F, Houenou J. Can neuroimaging disentangle bipolar disorder? J Affect Disord. 2016;195:199–214.
pubmed: 26896814
doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2016.01.039
Dilsaver SC, Chen YR, Shoaib AM, Swann AC. Phenomenology of mania: evidence for distinct depressed, dysphoric, and euphoric presentations. Am J Psychiatry. 1999;156:426–30.
pubmed: 10080559
doi: 10.1176/ajp.156.3.426
Goldberg JF, Garno JL, Portera L, Leon AC, Kocsis JH. Qualitative differences in manic symptoms during mixed versus pure mania. Compr Psychiatry. 2000;41:237–41.
pubmed: 10929789
doi: 10.1053/comp.2000.7427
Swann AC, Lafer B, Perugi G, Frye MA, Bauer M, Bahk WM, et al. Bipolar mixed states: an international society for bipolar disorders task force report of symptom structure, course of illness, and diagnosis. Am J Psychiatry. 2013;170:31–42.
pubmed: 23223893
doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2012.12030301
Solé B, Bonnin CM, Jiménez E, Torrent C, Torres I, Varo C, et al. Heterogeneity of functional outcomes in patients with bipolar disorder: a cluster-analytic approach. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2018;137:516–27.
pubmed: 29508379
doi: 10.1111/acps.12871
Botvinik-Nezer R, Holzmeister F, Camerer CF, Dreber A, Huber J, Johannesson M, et al. Variability in the analysis of a single neuroimaging dataset by many teams. Nature. 2020;582:84–8.
pubmed: 32483374
pmcid: 7771346
doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2314-9
Botvinik-Nezer R, Iwanir R, Holzmeister F, Huber J, Johannesson M, Kirchler M, et al. fMRI data of mixed gambles from the Neuroimaging Analysis Replication and Prediction Study. Sci Data. 2019;6:106.
pubmed: 31263104
pmcid: 6602933
doi: 10.1038/s41597-019-0113-7
Bodurka J, Ye F, Petridou N, Murphy K, Bandettini PA. Mapping the MRI voxel volume in which thermal noise matches physiological noise—Implications for fMRI. NeuroImage. 2007;34:542–9.
pubmed: 17101280
doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.09.039
Birn RM, Murphy K, Handwerker DA, Bandettini PA. fMRI in the presence of task-correlated breathing variations. Neuroimage. 2009;47:1092–104.
pubmed: 19460443
doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.05.030
Murphy K, Birn RM, Bandettini PA. Resting-state FMRI confounds and cleanup. Neuroimage. 2013;80:349–59.
pubmed: 23571418
doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.04.001
Kherif F, Josse G, Seghier ML, Price CJ. The main sources of intersubject variability in neuronal activation for reading aloud. J Cogn Neurosci. 2009;21:654–68.
pubmed: 18702580
pmcid: 2766833
doi: 10.1162/jocn.2009.21084
Garrett DD, Kovacevic N, McIntosh AR, Grady CL. Blood oxygen level-dependent signal variability is more than just noise. J Neurosci. 2010;30:4914–21.
pubmed: 20371811
pmcid: 6632804
doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5166-09.2010
Garrett DD, Samanez-Larkin GR, MacDonald SWS, Lindenberger U, McIntosh AR, Grady CL. Moment-to-moment brain signal variability: a next frontier in human brain mapping? Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2013;37:610–24.
pubmed: 23458776
pmcid: 3732213
doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2013.02.015
Garrett DD, Kovacevic N, McIntosh AR, Grady CL. The modulation of BOLD variability between cognitive states varies by age and processing speed. Cereb Cortex. 2013;23:684–93.
pubmed: 22419679
doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhs055
Ching CRK, Hibar DP, Gurholt TP, Nunes A, Thomopoulos SI, Abé C, et al. What we learn about bipolar disorder from large-scale neuroimaging: findings and future directions from the ENIGMA Bipolar Disorder Working Group. Human Brain Mapping. 2020. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/hbm.25098 .
Gonzalez R, Gonzalez SD, McCarthy MJ. Using chronobiological phenotypes to address heterogeneity in bipolar disorder. Mol Neuropsychiatry. 2019;5:72–84.
Hibar DP, Westlye LT, Doan NT, Jahanshad N, Cheung JW, Ching CRK, et al. Cortical abnormalities in bipolar disorder: an MRI analysis of 6503 individuals from the ENIGMA bipolar disorder working group. Mol Psychiatry. 2018;23:932–42.
pubmed: 28461699
doi: 10.1038/mp.2017.73
Eickhoff SB, Laird AR, Grefkes C, Wang LE, Zilles K, Fox PT. Coordinate‐based activation likelihood estimation meta‐analysis of neuroimaging data: A random‐effects approach based on empirical estimates of spatial uncertainty. Hum Brain Mapp. 2009;30:2907–26.
pubmed: 19172646
pmcid: 2872071
doi: 10.1002/hbm.20718
Eickhoff SB, Bzdok D, Laird AR, Kurth F, Fox PT. Activation likelihood estimation meta-analysis revisited. NeuroImage. 2012;59:2349–61.
pubmed: 21963913
doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.09.017
Müller VI, Cieslik EC, Laird AR, Fox PT, Radua J, Mataix-Cols D, et al. Ten simple rules for neuroimaging meta-analysis. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2018;84:151–61.
pubmed: 29180258
doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2017.11.012
Caspers S, Zilles K, Laird AR, Eickhoff SB. ALE meta-analysis of action observation and imitation in the human brain. Neuroimage. 2010;50:1148–67.
pubmed: 20056149
doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.12.112
Acar F, Seurinck R, Eickhoff SB, Moerkerke B. Assessing robustness against potential publication bias in Activation Likelihood Estimation (ALE) meta-analyses for fMRI. PLOS One. 2018;13:e0208177.
pubmed: 30500854
pmcid: 6267999
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0208177
Graham J, Salimi-Khorshidi G, Hagan C, Walsh N, Goodyer I, Lennox B, et al. Meta-analytic evidence for neuroimaging models of depression: State or trait? J Affect Disord. 2013;151:423–31.
pubmed: 23890584
doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2013.07.002
Eickhoff SB, Nichols TE, Laird AR, Hoffstaedter F, Amunts K, Fox PT, et al. Behavior, sensitivity, and power of activation likelihood estimation characterized by massive empirical simulation. NeuroImage. 2016;137:70–85.
pubmed: 27179606
doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.04.072
Thirion B, Pinel P, Mériaux S, Roche A, Dehaene S, Poline JB. Analysis of a large fMRI cohort: Statistical and methodological issues for group analyses. NeuroImage. 2007;35:105–20.
pubmed: 17239619
doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.11.054
Houenou J, Frommberger J, Carde S, Glasbrenner M, Diener C, Leboyer M, et al. Neuroimaging-based markers of bipolar disorder: evidence from two meta-analyses. J Affect Disord. 2011;132:344–55.
pubmed: 21470688
doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2011.03.016
Delvecchio G, Fossati P, Boyer P, Brambilla P, Falkai P, Gruber O, et al. Common and distinct neural correlates of emotional processing in bipolar disorder and major depressive disorder: a voxel-based meta-analysis of functional magnetic resonance imaging studies. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 2012;22:100–13.
pubmed: 21820878
doi: 10.1016/j.euroneuro.2011.07.003
Delvecchio G, Sugranyes G, Frangou S. Evidence of diagnostic specificity in the neural correlates of facial affect processing in bipolar disorder and schizophrenia: a meta-analysis of functional imaging studies. Psychological Med. 2013;43:553–69.
doi: 10.1017/S0033291712001432
Wang Y, Gao Y, Tang S, Lu L, Zhang L, Bu X, et al. Large-scale network dysfunction in the acute state compared to the remitted state of bipolar disorder: a meta-analysis of resting-state functional connectivity. EBioMedicine. 2020;54:102742.
pubmed: 32259712
pmcid: 7136605
doi: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2020.102742
Gong J, Wang J, Chen P, Qi Z, Luo Z, Wang J, et al. Large-scale network abnormality in bipolar disorder: a multimodal meta-analysis of resting-state functional and structural magnetic resonance imaging studies. J Affect Disord. 2021;292:9–20.
pubmed: 34087634
doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2021.05.052
Chen CH, Suckling J, Lennox BR, Ooi C, Bullmore ET. A quantitative meta-analysis of fMRI studies in bipolar disorder. Bipolar Disord. 2011;13:1–15.
pubmed: 21320248
doi: 10.1111/j.1399-5618.2011.00893.x
Zuo XN, Di Martino A, Kelly C, Shehzad ZE, Gee DG, Klein DF, et al. The oscillating brain: complex and reliable. NeuroImage. 2010;49:1432–45.
pubmed: 19782143
doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.09.037
Yu-Feng Z, Yong H, Chao-Zhe Z, Qing-Jiu C, Man-Qiu S, Meng L, et al. Altered baseline brain activity in children with ADHD revealed by resting-state functional MRI. Brain Dev. 2007;29:83–91.
doi: 10.1016/j.braindev.2006.07.002
Beckmann CF, DeLuca M, Devlin JT, Smith SM. Investigations into resting-state connectivity using independent component analysis. Philos Trans R Soc B Biol Sci. 2005;360:1001–13.
doi: 10.1098/rstb.2005.1634
Zang Y, Jiang T, Lu Y, He Y, Tian L. Regional homogeneity approach to fMRI data analysis. Neuroimage. 2004;22:394–400.
pubmed: 15110032
doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2003.12.030
Buckner RL, Sepulcre J, Talukdar T, Krienen FM, Liu H, Hedden T, et al. Cortical hubs revealed by intrinsic functional connectivity: mapping, assessment of stability, and relation to Alzheimer’s disease. J Neurosci. 2009;29:1860–73.
pubmed: 19211893
pmcid: 2750039
doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5062-08.2009
Keener MT, Phillips ML. Neuroimaging in bipolar disorder: a critical review of current findings. Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2007;9:512–20.
pubmed: 18221633
pmcid: 2686113
doi: 10.1007/s11920-007-0070-2
Quraishi S, Frangou S. Neuropsychology of bipolar disorder: a review. J Affect Disord. 2002;72:209–26.
pubmed: 12450638
doi: 10.1016/S0165-0327(02)00091-5
Solé B, Jiménez E, Torrent C, Reinares M, del Bonnin CM, et al. Cognitive impairment in bipolar disorder: treatment and prevention strategies. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol. 2017;20:670–80.
pubmed: 28498954
pmcid: 5570032
doi: 10.1093/ijnp/pyx032
Robinson LJ, Thompson JM, Gallagher P, Goswami U, Young AH, Ferrier IN, et al. A meta-analysis of cognitive deficits in euthymic patients with bipolar disorder. J Affect Disord. 2006;93:105–15.
pubmed: 16677713
doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2006.02.016
Miola A, Cattarinussi G, Antiga G, Caiolo S, Solmi M, Sambataro F. Difficulties in emotion regulation in bipolar disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Affect Disord. 2022;302:352–60.
pubmed: 35093412
doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2022.01.102
Kohler CG, Hoffman LJ, Eastman LB, Healey K, Moberg PJ. Facial emotion perception in depression and bipolar disorder: a quantitative review. Psychiatry Res. 2011;188:303–9.
doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2011.04.019
Bora E. Neurocognitive features in clinical subgroups of bipolar disorder: a meta-analysis. J Affect Disord. 2018;229:125–34.
pubmed: 29306692
doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2017.12.057
Depp CA, Mausbach BT, Harmell AL, Savla GN, Bowie CR, Harvey PD, et al. Meta-analysis of the association between cognitive abilities and everyday functioning in bipolar disorder. Bipolar Disord. 2012;14:217–26.
pubmed: 22548895
pmcid: 3396289
doi: 10.1111/j.1399-5618.2012.01011.x
Soraggi-Frez C, Santos FH, Albuquerque PB, Malloy-Diniz LF. Disentangling working memory functioning in mood states of bipolar disorder: a systematic review. Front Psychol. 2017;8. https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00574 .
Kurtz MM, Gerraty RT. A meta-analytic investigation of neurocognitive deficits in bipolar illness: profile and effects of clinical state. Neuropsychology. 2009;23:551–62.
pubmed: 19702409
pmcid: 2804472
doi: 10.1037/a0016277
Elliott ML, Knodt AR, Ireland D, Morris ML, Poulton R, Ramrakha S, et al. What Is the test-retest reliability of common task-functional MRI measures? New empirical evidence and a meta-analysis. Psychol Sci. 2020;31:792–806.
pubmed: 32489141
pmcid: 7370246
doi: 10.1177/0956797620916786
Kragel P, Han X, Kraynak TE, Gianaros P, Wager T. fMRI can be highly reliable, but it depends on what you measure. 2020. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/9eaxk .
Shehzad Z, Kelly AMC, Reiss PT, Gee DG, Gotimer K, Uddin LQ, et al. The resting brain: unconstrained yet reliable. Cereb Cortex. 2009;19:2209–29.
pubmed: 19221144
pmcid: 3896030
doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhn256
Fox M, Greicius M. Clinical applications of resting state functional connectivity. Front Syst Neurosci. 2010;4:19.
pubmed: 20592951
pmcid: 2893721
Ladouceur CD, Peper JS, Crone EA, Dahl RE. White matter development in adolescence: the influence of puberty and implications for affective disorders. Dev Cogn Neurosci. 2012;2:36–54.
pubmed: 22247751
doi: 10.1016/j.dcn.2011.06.002
Dai J, Scherf KS. Puberty and functional brain development in humans: convergence in findings? Dev Cogn Neurosci. 2019;39:100690.
pubmed: 31450015
pmcid: 6969369
doi: 10.1016/j.dcn.2019.100690
Goddings AL, Beltz A, Peper JS, Crone EA, Braams BR. Understanding the role of puberty in structural and functional development of the adolescent brain. J Res Adolescence. 2019;29:32–53.
doi: 10.1111/jora.12408
Sisk CL, Zehr JL. Pubertal hormones organize the adolescent brain and behavior. Front Neuroendocrinol. 2005;26:163–74.
pubmed: 16309736
doi: 10.1016/j.yfrne.2005.10.003
Peper JS, Dahl RE. The teenage brain: surging hormones—brain-behavior interactions during puberty. Curr Dir Psychol Sci. 2013;22:134–9.
pubmed: 26290625
pmcid: 4539143
doi: 10.1177/0963721412473755
Eickhoff SB, Stephan KE, Mohlberg H, Grefkes C, Fink GR, Amunts K, et al. A new SPM toolbox for combining probabilistic cytoarchitectonic maps and functional imaging data. NeuroImage 2005;25:1325–35.
pubmed: 15850749
doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.12.034
McTeague LM, Huemer J, Carreon DM, Jiang Y, Eickhoff SB, Etkin A. Identification of common neural circuit disruptions in cognitive control across psychiatric disorders. Am J Psychiatry. 2017;174:676–85.
pubmed: 28320224
pmcid: 5543416
doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2017.16040400
McTeague LM, Rosenberg BM, Lopez JW, Carreon DM, Huemer J, Jiang Y, et al. Identification of common neural circuit disruptions in emotional processing across psychiatric disorders. Am J Psychiatry. 2020;177:411–21.
pubmed: 31964160
pmcid: 7280468
doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2019.18111271
Müller VI, Cieslik EC, Serbanescu I, Laird AR, Fox PT, Eickhoff SB. Altered brain activity in unipolar depression revisited: meta-analyses of neuroimaging studies. JAMA Psychiatry. 2017;74:47–55.
pubmed: 27829086
pmcid: 5293141
doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2016.2783
Jamil T, Ly A, Morey RD, Love J, Marsman M, Wagenmakers EJ. Default “Gunel and Dickey” Bayes factors for contingency tables. Behav Res. 2017;49:638–52.
doi: 10.3758/s13428-016-0739-8
Turkeltaub P, Eickhoff S, Laird A, Fox M, Wiener M, Fox P. Minimizing within-experiment and within-group effects in activation likelihood estimation meta-analyses. Hum Brain Mapp. 2012;33:1–13.
pubmed: 21305667
doi: 10.1002/hbm.21186
Bora E, Yücel M, Pantelis C. Neurocognitive markers of psychosis in bipolar disorder: a meta-analytic study. J Affect Disord. 2010;127:1–9.
pubmed: 20231037
doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2010.02.117
Potash JB. Carving chaos: genetics and the classification of mood and psychotic syndromes. Harv Rev Psychiatry. 2006;14:47–63.
pubmed: 16603472
doi: 10.1080/10673220600655780
Benjamini Y, Drai D, Elmer G, Kafkafi N, Golani I. Controlling the false discovery rate in behavior genetics research. Behav Brain Res. 2001;125:279–84.
pubmed: 11682119
doi: 10.1016/S0166-4328(01)00297-2
Vul E, Pashler H. Voodoo and circularity errors. NeuroImage. 2012;62:945–8.
pubmed: 22270348
doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.01.027
Rosenberg MS. A generalized formula for converting chi-square tests to effect sizes for meta-analysis. PLOS One. 2010;5:e10059.
pubmed: 20383281
pmcid: 2850938
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0010059
Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. 2nd ed. New York: Routledge; 1988. 567 p.
Kaiser RH, Andrews-Hanna JR, Wager TD, Pizzagalli DA. Large-scale network dysfunction in major depressive disorder: a meta-analysis of resting-state functional connectivity. JAMA Psychiatry. 2015;72:603–11.
pubmed: 25785575
pmcid: 4456260
doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2015.0071
Leech R, Sharp DJ. The role of the posterior cingulate cortex in cognition and disease. Brain. 2014;137:12–32.
pubmed: 23869106
doi: 10.1093/brain/awt162
Zovetti N, Rossetti MG, Perlini C, Maggioni E, Bontempi P, Bellani M, et al. Default mode network activity in bipolar disorder. Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci. 2020;29. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7503172/ .
Syan SK, Smith M, Frey BN, Remtulla R, Kapczinski F, Hall GBC, et al. Resting-state functional connectivity in individuals with bipolar disorder during clinical remission: a systematic review. J Psychiatry Neurosci. 2018;43:298–316.
pubmed: 30125243
pmcid: 6158027
doi: 10.1503/jpn.170175
Malhi GS, Lagopoulos J, Owen AM, Ivanovski B, Shnier R, Sachdev P. Reduced activation to implicit affect induction in euthymic bipolar patients: An fMRI study. J Affect Disord. 2007;97:109–22.
pubmed: 16837058
doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2006.06.005
Wessa M, Houenou J, Paillère-Martinot ML, Berthoz S, Artiges E, Leboyer M, et al. Fronto-striatal overactivation in euthymic bipolar patients during an emotional Go/NoGo task. AJP. 2007;164:638–46.
doi: 10.1176/ajp.2007.164.4.638
Lennox BR, Jacob R, Calder AJ, Lupson V, Bullmore ET. Behavioural and neurocognitive responses to sad facial affect are attenuated in patients with mania. Psychological Med. 2004;34:795–802.
doi: 10.1017/S0033291704002557
Malhi GS, Lagopoulos J, Sachdev P, Mitchell PB, Ivanovski B, Parker GB. Cognitive generation of affect in hypomania: an fMRI study. Bipolar Disord. 2004;6:271–85.
pubmed: 15225144
doi: 10.1111/j.1399-5618.2004.00123.x
Uddin LQ, Yeo BTT, Spreng RN. Towards a universal taxonomy of macro-scale functional human brain networks. Brain Topogr. 2019;32:926–42.
pubmed: 31707621
pmcid: 7325607
doi: 10.1007/s10548-019-00744-6
Witt ST, van Ettinger-Veenstra H, Salo T, Riedel MC, Laird AR. What executive function network is that? An image-based meta-analysis of network labels. Brain Topogr. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10548-021-00847-z .
Clark L, Iversen SD, Goodwin GM. Sustained attention deficit in bipolar disorder. Br J Psychiatry. 2002;180:313–9.
pubmed: 11925353
doi: 10.1192/bjp.180.4.313
Harmer CJ, Clark L, Grayson L, Goodwin GM. Sustained attention deficit in bipolar disorder is not a working memory impairment in disguise. Neuropsychologia. 2002;40:1586–90.
pubmed: 11985840
doi: 10.1016/S0028-3932(02)00019-2
Clark L, Kempton MJ, Scarnà A, Grasby PM, Goodwin GM. Sustained attention-deficit confirmed in euthymic bipolar disorder but not in first-degree relatives of bipolar patients or euthymic unipolar depression. Biol Psychiatry. 2005;57:183–7.
pubmed: 15652878
doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2004.11.007
Farruggia MC, Laird AR, Mattfeld AT. Common default mode network dysfunction across psychopathologies: a neuroimaging meta-analysis of the n-back working memory paradigm. 2020. https://europepmc.org/article/ppr/ppr111170 .
Marchand WR, Yurgelun‐Todd D. Striatal structure and function in mood disorders: a comprehensive review. Bipolar Disord. 2010;12:764–85.
pubmed: 21176024
doi: 10.1111/j.1399-5618.2010.00874.x
Association AP. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (DSM-5®). Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Association; 2013.
Logothetis NK. What we can do and what we cannot do with fMRI. Nature. 2008;453:869–78.
pubmed: 18548064
doi: 10.1038/nature06976
Perry A, Roberts G, Mitchell PB, Breakspear M. Connectomics of bipolar disorder: a critical review, and evidence for dynamic instabilities within interoceptive networks. Mol Psychiatry. 2019;24:1296–318.
pubmed: 30279458
doi: 10.1038/s41380-018-0267-2
Bi B, Che D, Bai Y. Neural network of bipolar disorder: Toward integration of neuroimaging and neurocircuit-based treatment strategies. Transl Psychiatry. 2022;12:1–12.
doi: 10.1038/s41398-022-01917-x
Magioncalda P, Martino M. A unified model of the pathophysiology of bipolar disorder. Mol Psychiatry. 2022;27:202–11.
pubmed: 33859358
doi: 10.1038/s41380-021-01091-4
Volman I, Pringle A, Verhagen L, Browning M, Cowen PJ, Harmer CJ. Lithium modulates striatal reward anticipation and prediction error coding in healthy volunteers. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2021;46:386–93.
pubmed: 33127993
doi: 10.1038/s41386-020-00895-2
Hafeman DM, Chang KD, Garrett AS, Sanders EM, Phillips ML. Effects of medication on neuroimaging findings in bipolar disorder: an updated review. Bipolar Disord. 2012;14:375–410.
pubmed: 22631621
doi: 10.1111/j.1399-5618.2012.01023.x