Origins, timing and introgression of domestic geese revealed by whole genome data.
Domestication
Goose
Introgression
Phylogeny
Journal
Journal of animal science and biotechnology
ISSN: 1674-9782
Titre abrégé: J Anim Sci Biotechnol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101581293
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
13 Feb 2023
13 Feb 2023
Historique:
received:
05
08
2022
accepted:
14
12
2022
entrez:
14
2
2023
pubmed:
15
2
2023
medline:
15
2
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Geese are among the most important poultry species in the world. The current generally accepted hypothesis is that the European domestic geese originated from greylag geese (Anser anser), and Chinese domestic geese have two origins, most of which originated from swan geese (Anser cygnoides), and the Yili goose originated from greylag geese. To explain the origin and demographic history of geese, we selected 14 goose breeds from Europe and China and wild populations of swan and greylag geese, and whole genome sequencing data were obtained for 74 samples. Population structure analysis and phylogenetic trees showed that the wild ancestor of Chinese domestic geese, except for Yili, is the swan geese, and the wild ancestor of Chinese Yili and European domestic geese is greylag geese. Analysis of the demographic history suggests that the domestication of Chinese geese occurred ~ 3499 years ago and that of the European geese occurred ~ 7552 years ago. Furthermore, gene flow was observed between domestic geese and their wild ancestors. Analysis of introgression showed that Yili geese had been introgressed by Chinese domestic geese, and the body size of Yili geese may be influenced by introgression events of some growth-related genes, including IGF-1. Our study provides evidence for the origin of geese at the genome-wide level and advances the understanding of the history of goose domestication and the traits affected by introgression events.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Geese are among the most important poultry species in the world. The current generally accepted hypothesis is that the European domestic geese originated from greylag geese (Anser anser), and Chinese domestic geese have two origins, most of which originated from swan geese (Anser cygnoides), and the Yili goose originated from greylag geese. To explain the origin and demographic history of geese, we selected 14 goose breeds from Europe and China and wild populations of swan and greylag geese, and whole genome sequencing data were obtained for 74 samples.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Population structure analysis and phylogenetic trees showed that the wild ancestor of Chinese domestic geese, except for Yili, is the swan geese, and the wild ancestor of Chinese Yili and European domestic geese is greylag geese. Analysis of the demographic history suggests that the domestication of Chinese geese occurred ~ 3499 years ago and that of the European geese occurred ~ 7552 years ago. Furthermore, gene flow was observed between domestic geese and their wild ancestors. Analysis of introgression showed that Yili geese had been introgressed by Chinese domestic geese, and the body size of Yili geese may be influenced by introgression events of some growth-related genes, including IGF-1.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
Our study provides evidence for the origin of geese at the genome-wide level and advances the understanding of the history of goose domestication and the traits affected by introgression events.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36782272
doi: 10.1186/s40104-022-00826-9
pii: 10.1186/s40104-022-00826-9
pmc: PMC9926862
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
26Subventions
Organisme : Provincial State Key Laboratory Open Fund of China
ID : BRZD2104
Organisme : National Nature Science Foundation of China
ID : 31960648
Organisme : Science and Technology Support Plan for Youth Innovation of Colleges and Universities of Shandong Province of China
ID : Rural Revitalization science and technology support
Informations de copyright
© 2023. The Author(s).
Références
Mol Biol Evol. 2018 Jun 1;35(6):1547-1549
pubmed: 29722887
Bioinformatics. 2009 Jul 15;25(14):1754-60
pubmed: 19451168
Cell. 1988 Dec 2;55(5):887-98
pubmed: 3142690
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2022 Mar 22;119(12):e2117064119
pubmed: 35254874
Nucleic Acids Res. 2020 Jan 8;48(D1):D87-D92
pubmed: 31701148
Anim Genet. 2015 Oct;46(5):485-97
pubmed: 26096191
Mol Biol Evol. 2016 Feb;33(2):591-3
pubmed: 26545922
PLoS Genet. 2009 Oct;5(10):e1000695
pubmed: 19851460
Anim Genet. 2013 Aug;44(5):584-7
pubmed: 23647079
Genome Biol Evol. 2019 Jul 1;11(7):1847-1856
pubmed: 31263886
Mol Pathol. 2001 Oct;54(5):311-6
pubmed: 11577173
Methods Enzymol. 1987;152:180-3
pubmed: 3657568
Domest Anim Endocrinol. 2021 Apr;75:106584
pubmed: 33276215
J Physiol Pharmacol. 2005 Jun;56 Suppl 3:25-35
pubmed: 16077194
J Hered. 1968 May-Jun;59(3):191-5
pubmed: 5703379
Nat Protoc. 2009;4(1):44-57
pubmed: 19131956
PLoS One. 2012;7(2):e30619
pubmed: 22312429
Eur J Cancer. 2005 Nov;41(16):2438-48
pubmed: 16209919
Genome Res. 2010 Sep;20(9):1297-303
pubmed: 20644199
Mol Cell Endocrinol. 1997 Feb 7;126(2):153-63
pubmed: 9089653
Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2000 Jun;164(1-2):205-18
pubmed: 11026572
G3 (Bethesda). 2020 Sep 2;10(9):3061-3070
pubmed: 32680852
Bioinformatics. 2019 May 15;35(10):1786-1788
pubmed: 30321304
Nature. 2010 Mar 25;464(7288):587-91
pubmed: 20220755
Heredity (Edinb). 2016 Oct;117(4):193-206
pubmed: 27353047
Heredity (Edinb). 2020 Aug;125(1-2):73-84
pubmed: 32451423
J Invest Dermatol. 1992 Sep;99(3):343-9
pubmed: 1324963
Nat Commun. 2018 Jun 14;9(1):2337
pubmed: 29904051
Sci Rep. 2016 Sep 09;6:32961
pubmed: 27608918
Poult Sci. 2011 Dec;90(12):2705-10
pubmed: 22080007
Cell Res. 2020 Aug;30(8):693-701
pubmed: 32581344
Gene. 1999 Oct 1;238(2):291-300
pubmed: 10570957
Biochem Genet. 2006 Jun;44(5-6):237-45
pubmed: 16957989
J Mol Cell Biol. 2016 Dec;8(6):542-552
pubmed: 27744377
Mol Ecol Resour. 2017 Jan;17(1):27-32
pubmed: 26850166
Genetics. 2014 Jul;197(3):795-808
pubmed: 25024034
Mol Ecol Resour. 2021 Feb;21(2):584-595
pubmed: 33012121
Science. 2000 Mar 24;287(5461):2254-7
pubmed: 10731145
Bioinformatics. 2011 Aug 1;27(15):2156-8
pubmed: 21653522
BMC Genomics. 2014 Feb 26;15:162
pubmed: 24571581
Mol Biol Evol. 2021 Mar 9;38(3):838-855
pubmed: 32941615
PLoS Genet. 2012;8(11):e1002967
pubmed: 23166502
J Clin Invest. 2001 Jan;107(2):181-9
pubmed: 11160134
J Anim Sci. 1986 Nov;63(5):1389-99
pubmed: 3098726
Nat Genet. 2017 Feb;49(2):303-309
pubmed: 28024154
BMC Evol Biol. 2017 Aug 22;17(1):201
pubmed: 28830337
Am J Hum Genet. 2007 Sep;81(3):559-75
pubmed: 17701901
Nat Commun. 2013;4:2755
pubmed: 24202175
Science. 1988 Dec 16;242(4885):1566-70
pubmed: 3059495
Yi Chuan Xue Bao. 1998 Dec;25(6):499-507
pubmed: 10465896
Genome Res. 2009 Sep;19(9):1655-64
pubmed: 19648217
Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2016 Aug;101:303-313
pubmed: 27233434
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012 Jun 5;109(23):8878-83
pubmed: 22615366
Gigascience. 2018 Apr 1;7(4):
pubmed: 29635409
Arch Anim Breed. 2021 Jul 22;64(2):315-323
pubmed: 34345653
Am J Hum Genet. 2019 Apr 4;104(4):777
pubmed: 30951678
Annu Rev Anim Biosci. 2017 Feb 8;5:329-351
pubmed: 27813680
Br Foreign Med Chir Rev. 1868 Jul;42(83):143-166
pubmed: 30163123
J Biol Chem. 1991 May 25;266(15):9724-31
pubmed: 2033062
J Bioenerg Biomembr. 1999 Apr;31(2):129-35
pubmed: 10449239