Efficacy, safety and indirect comparisons of lasmiditan, rimegepant, and ubrogepant for the acute treatment of migraine: A systematic review and network meta-analysis of the literature.


Journal

Cephalalgia : an international journal of headache
ISSN: 1468-2982
Titre abrégé: Cephalalgia
Pays: England
ID NLM: 8200710

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
03 2023
Historique:
entrez: 14 2 2023
pubmed: 15 2 2023
medline: 16 2 2023
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

We performed a random-effects network meta-analysis to study the efficacy and safety of newly developed drugs for the acute treatment of migraine attacks. MEDLINE via PubMed, Embase and The Cochrane Register of Controlled Trials were searched from inception to 11 February 2022. Phase 3 randomized controlled trials examining all formulations of lasmiditan, rimegepant and ubrogepant for the acute treatment of adults with migraine, were included. Data were extracted following the PRISMA guidelines. Seven studies (SAMURAI, SPARTAN, CENTURION, Study 302, Study 303, ACHIEVE I and II) involving Lasmiditan 200 mg was the most effective intervention in the treatment of migraine attacks, although it was associated with high degrees of dizziness, nausea and somnolence. Rimegepant showed slightly lower, but similar efficacy rates to lasmiditan. Ubrogepant had overall the best tolerability profile. These conclusions are limited by the absence of head-to-head comparisons, limitations of individual trials and of the meta-analysis methodology itself.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
We performed a random-effects network meta-analysis to study the efficacy and safety of newly developed drugs for the acute treatment of migraine attacks.
METHODS
MEDLINE via PubMed, Embase and The Cochrane Register of Controlled Trials were searched from inception to 11 February 2022. Phase 3 randomized controlled trials examining all formulations of lasmiditan, rimegepant and ubrogepant for the acute treatment of adults with migraine, were included. Data were extracted following the PRISMA guidelines.
RESULTS
Seven studies (SAMURAI, SPARTAN, CENTURION, Study 302, Study 303, ACHIEVE I and II) involving
CONCLUSION
Lasmiditan 200 mg was the most effective intervention in the treatment of migraine attacks, although it was associated with high degrees of dizziness, nausea and somnolence. Rimegepant showed slightly lower, but similar efficacy rates to lasmiditan. Ubrogepant had overall the best tolerability profile. These conclusions are limited by the absence of head-to-head comparisons, limitations of individual trials and of the meta-analysis methodology itself.

Identifiants

pubmed: 36786357
doi: 10.1177/03331024231151419
doi:

Substances chimiques

lasmiditan 760I9WM792
ubrogepant AD0O8X2QJR
rimegepant sulfate 1383NM3Q0H

Types de publication

Meta-Analysis Systematic Review Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

3331024231151419

Auteurs

Francesca Puledda (F)

Headache Group, Wolfson CARD, SLaM Biomedical Research Centre, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London and NIHR-Wellcome Trust King's Clinical Research Facility, King's College Hospital, London, United Kingdom.

Samaira Younis (S)

Danish Headache Center, Department of Neurology, Rigshospitalet Glostrup, Denmark.

Eva-Maria Huessler (EM)

Institute for Medical Informatics, Biometry and Epidemiology, University Hospital Essen, Germany.

Faraidoon Haghdoost (F)

The George Institute for Global Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.

Marco Lisicki (M)

Headache Department, Neuroscience Unit, Conci·Carpinella Institute, Córdoba, Argentina.

Peter J Goadsby (PJ)

Headache Group, Wolfson CARD, SLaM Biomedical Research Centre, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London and NIHR-Wellcome Trust King's Clinical Research Facility, King's College Hospital, London, United Kingdom.
Department of Neurology, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, United States.

Cristina Tassorelli (C)

Headache Science Center, C. Mondino Foundation, Pavia, Italy.
University of Pavia, Department of Brain and Behavioral Sciences, Pavia, Italy.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH