Improving Implementation of an Electronic Prescription System for COVID-19 Vaccination in the Czech Republic: Process Modeling Approach.
COVID-19
communication
eHealth
electronic prescription
medical
platform
process modeling
state diagram
vaccination
vaccine
Journal
JMIR formative research
ISSN: 2561-326X
Titre abrégé: JMIR Form Res
Pays: Canada
ID NLM: 101726394
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
03 Mar 2023
03 Mar 2023
Historique:
received:
31
07
2022
accepted:
14
02
2023
revised:
19
12
2022
pubmed:
15
2
2023
medline:
15
2
2023
entrez:
14
2
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
It is very difficult to find a consensus that will be accepted by most players when creating health care legislation. The Czech electronic prescription system was launched in 2011 and new functions were introduced in 2018. To ensure that these functions will not conflict with any other existing law, a process modeling tool based on the patent "Method and system for automated requirements modeling" was used successfully in the Czech Republic for the first time. The aim of this project was to develop another successful application of process modeling to add COVID-19 vaccination records to the existing electronic prescription system. The method employed was based on the mathematical theory of hierarchical state diagrams and process models. In the first step, sketches that record the results of informal discussions, interviews, meetings, and workshops were prepared. Subsequently, the architecture containing the main participants and their high-level interactions was drafted. Finally, detailed process diagrams were drawn. Each semiresult was discussed with all involved team members and stakeholders to incorporate all comments. By repeating this procedure, individual topics were gradually resolved and the areas of discussion were narrowed down until reaching complete agreement. This method proved to be faster, clearer, and significantly simpler than other methods. Owing to the use of graphic tools and symbols, the risk of errors, inaccuracies, and misunderstandings was significantly reduced. The outcome was used as an annex to the bill in the legislative process. One of the main benefits of this approach is gaining a higher level of understanding for all parties involved (ie, legislators, the medical community, patient organizations, and information technology professionals). The process architecture model in a form of a graphic scheme has proven to be a valuable communication platform and facilitated negotiation between stakeholders. Moreover, this model helped to avoid several inconsistencies that appeared during workshops and discussions. Our method worked successfully even when participants were from different knowledge areas. The vaccination record process model was drafted in 3 weeks and it took a total of 2 months to pass the bill. In comparison, the initial introduction of the electronic prescription system using conventional legislative methods took over 1 year, involving immediate creation of a text with legislative intent, followed by paragraph-by-section wording of the legislation that was commented on directly. These steps are repeated over and over, as any change in any part of the text has to be checked and rechecked within the entire document. Compared with conventional methods, we have shown that using our method for the process of modification of legislation related to such a complex issue as the integration of COVID-19 vaccination into an electronic prescription model significantly simplifies the preparation of a legislative standard.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
It is very difficult to find a consensus that will be accepted by most players when creating health care legislation. The Czech electronic prescription system was launched in 2011 and new functions were introduced in 2018. To ensure that these functions will not conflict with any other existing law, a process modeling tool based on the patent "Method and system for automated requirements modeling" was used successfully in the Czech Republic for the first time.
OBJECTIVE
OBJECTIVE
The aim of this project was to develop another successful application of process modeling to add COVID-19 vaccination records to the existing electronic prescription system.
METHODS
METHODS
The method employed was based on the mathematical theory of hierarchical state diagrams and process models. In the first step, sketches that record the results of informal discussions, interviews, meetings, and workshops were prepared. Subsequently, the architecture containing the main participants and their high-level interactions was drafted. Finally, detailed process diagrams were drawn. Each semiresult was discussed with all involved team members and stakeholders to incorporate all comments. By repeating this procedure, individual topics were gradually resolved and the areas of discussion were narrowed down until reaching complete agreement.
RESULTS
RESULTS
This method proved to be faster, clearer, and significantly simpler than other methods. Owing to the use of graphic tools and symbols, the risk of errors, inaccuracies, and misunderstandings was significantly reduced. The outcome was used as an annex to the bill in the legislative process. One of the main benefits of this approach is gaining a higher level of understanding for all parties involved (ie, legislators, the medical community, patient organizations, and information technology professionals). The process architecture model in a form of a graphic scheme has proven to be a valuable communication platform and facilitated negotiation between stakeholders. Moreover, this model helped to avoid several inconsistencies that appeared during workshops and discussions. Our method worked successfully even when participants were from different knowledge areas.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
The vaccination record process model was drafted in 3 weeks and it took a total of 2 months to pass the bill. In comparison, the initial introduction of the electronic prescription system using conventional legislative methods took over 1 year, involving immediate creation of a text with legislative intent, followed by paragraph-by-section wording of the legislation that was commented on directly. These steps are repeated over and over, as any change in any part of the text has to be checked and rechecked within the entire document. Compared with conventional methods, we have shown that using our method for the process of modification of legislation related to such a complex issue as the integration of COVID-19 vaccination into an electronic prescription model significantly simplifies the preparation of a legislative standard.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36787233
pii: v7i1e41575
doi: 10.2196/41575
pmc: PMC9994423
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
e41575Informations de copyright
©Jiri Berger, Jan Bruthans, Jiří Kofránek. Originally published in JMIR Formative Research (https://formative.jmir.org), 03.03.2023.
Références
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Sep 15;24(9):e29927
pubmed: 36107480
Am J Public Health. 2006 Mar;96(3):473-9
pubmed: 16449586
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Jun 18;23(6):e23715
pubmed: 34142967
Int J Med Inform. 2019 Jul;127:43-51
pubmed: 31128831
Int J Med Inform. 2019 Mar;123:49-53
pubmed: 30654903
JMIR Hum Factors. 2016 Jul 28;3(2):e20
pubmed: 27471006
Int J Med Inform. 2020 Sep;141:104205
pubmed: 32492586
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Sep 4;21(1):915
pubmed: 34479541
J Med Internet Res. 2021 May 10;23(5):e27180
pubmed: 33970123
PLoS Med. 2011 Jan 18;8(1):e1000387
pubmed: 21267058