The influence of dietary protein concentration on digestive enzyme activities, growth, and body composition in juvenile bullseye snakehead (Channa marulius).


Journal

PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Titre abrégé: PLoS One
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101285081

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2023
Historique:
received: 18 10 2022
accepted: 19 01 2023
entrez: 14 2 2023
pubmed: 15 2 2023
medline: 17 2 2023
Statut: epublish

Résumé

The bullseye snakehead (Channa marulius) is considered as an affordable and robust freshwater fish for farming in Asia. However, there is limited knowledge on the species' full nutritional requirements to date with extensive gaps in our knowledge and particularly in precision aspects of protein requirements. Therefore, a three-month feeding trial was conducted under semi-intensive farming conditions to determine the protein requirement of bullseye snakehead using test diets containing 40 (P40), 45 (P45), 50 (P50), and 55% (P55) crude protein levels. The growth performance results revealed that the 55% dietary protein group (P55) had the highest final mean weight (14.09 g fish-1), and net weight gain (12.82 g fish-1). When compared to other dietary treatments, the final weight (R2 = 0.921), and weight gain (R2 = 0.913), displayed a linear increasing trend as dietary protein is raised. The lowest FCR was observed in 50% (1.94±0.01) and 55% (1.97±0.01) CP diet groups compared to dietary treatments. Further analysis has shown that the body protein content also significantly increased as dietary protein was raised to 55%. Although, a reverse trend was found in body lipid levels with increasing protein in the diet. The incremental dietary protein also elevated proximal intestinal protease activity but decreased amylase and lipase activity. The overall essential and non-essential amino acids levels of snakehead fillet muscle reflected an increase in dietary protein. Overall, this study has shown that the fish fed a diet with 55% crude protein attained the highest growth performance and nutrient profile of the whole fish when compared to other dietary treatments tested. It would appear we did not obtain the maximum potential for growth under the present experimental conditions due to the upper protein constraint of 55% in the diet. Further quantitative studies are suggested.

Identifiants

pubmed: 36787289
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0281274
pii: PONE-D-22-28731
pmc: PMC9928133
doi:

Substances chimiques

Dietary Proteins 0

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

e0281274

Informations de copyright

Copyright: © 2023 Nazir et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Références

J Agric Food Chem. 2009 Nov 25;57(22):10972-8
pubmed: 19877637
Amino Acids. 2020 May;52(5):671-691
pubmed: 32405703
Comp Biochem Physiol B Biochem Mol Biol. 2002 Jun;132(2):343-52
pubmed: 12031459
Fish Physiol Biochem. 2009 Aug;35(3):479-88
pubmed: 18998230
J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr (Berl). 2011 Feb;95(1):56-64
pubmed: 20487102
Front Physiol. 2010 Oct 04;1:134
pubmed: 21423375
Comp Biochem Physiol B Biochem Mol Biol. 2004 Mar;137(3):331-9
pubmed: 15050520
J Exp Biol. 2003 Feb;206(Pt 4):693-704
pubmed: 12517987
Anim Nutr. 2017 Jun;3(2):156-163
pubmed: 29767108

Auteurs

Sadia Nazir (S)

Department of Fisheries & Aquaculture, University of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Lahore, Pakistan.

Noor Khan (N)

Department of Fisheries & Aquaculture, University of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Lahore, Pakistan.

Mahroze Fatima (M)

Department of Fisheries & Aquaculture, University of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Lahore, Pakistan.

Hamda Azmat (H)

Department of Fisheries & Aquaculture, University of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Lahore, Pakistan.

Saima Naveed (S)

Department of Animal Nutrition, University of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Lahore, Pakistan.

Malik Muhammad Ramzan (MM)

Department of Fisheries, Government of the Punjab, Lahore, Pakistan.

Muhammad Asghar (M)

Department of Fisheries & Aquaculture, University of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Lahore, Pakistan.

Sheeza Bano (S)

Department of Fisheries & Aquaculture, University of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Lahore, Pakistan.

Ayesha Khizer (A)

Department of Fisheries & Aquaculture, University of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Lahore, Pakistan.

Alex H L Wan (AHL)

Aquaculture and Nutrition Research Unit (ANRU), Carna Research Station, Ryan Institute and School of Natural Sciences, College of Science and Engineering, University of Galway, Galway city, Ireland.

Simon John Davies (SJ)

Aquaculture and Nutrition Research Unit (ANRU), Carna Research Station, Ryan Institute and School of Natural Sciences, College of Science and Engineering, University of Galway, Galway city, Ireland.

Articles similaires

Robotic Surgical Procedures Animals Humans Telemedicine Models, Animal

Odour generalisation and detection dog training.

Lyn Caldicott, Thomas W Pike, Helen E Zulch et al.
1.00
Animals Odorants Dogs Generalization, Psychological Smell
Animals TOR Serine-Threonine Kinases Colorectal Neoplasms Colitis Mice
Animals Tail Swine Behavior, Animal Animal Husbandry

Classifications MeSH