Interventions to reintroduce or increase assisted vaginal births: a systematic review of the literature.

obstetrics perinatology public health

Journal

BMJ open
ISSN: 2044-6055
Titre abrégé: BMJ Open
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101552874

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
14 02 2023
Historique:
entrez: 14 2 2023
pubmed: 15 2 2023
medline: 17 2 2023
Statut: epublish

Résumé

To synthesise the evidence from studies that implemented interventions to increase/reintroduce the use of assisted vaginal births (AVB). Systematic review. We included experimental, semi-experimental and observational studies that reported any intervention to reintroduce/increase AVB use. We searched PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, LILACS, Scopus, Cochrane, WHO Library, Web of Science, ClinicalTrials.gov and WHO.int/ictrp through September 2021. For trials, we used the Cochrane Effective Practice and Organisation of Care tool; for other designs we used Risk of Bias for Non-Randomised Studies of Interventions. Due to heterogeneity in interventions, we did not conduct meta-analyses. We present data descriptively, grouping studies according to settings: high-income countries (HICs) or low/middle-income countries (LMICs). We classified direction of intervention effects as (a) statistically significant increase or decrease, (b) no statistically significant change or (c) statistical significance not reported in primary study. We provide qualitative syntheses of the main barriers and enablers for success of the intervention. We included 16 studies (10 from LMICs), mostly of low or moderate methodological quality, which described interventions with various components (eg, didactic sessions, simulation, hands-on training, guidelines, audit/feedback). All HICs studies described isolated initiatives to increase AVB use; 9/10 LMIC studies tested initiatives to increase AVB use as part of larger multicomponent interventions to improve maternal/perinatal healthcare. No study assessed women's views or designed interventions using behavioural theories. Overall, interventions were less successful in LMICs than in HICs. Increase in AVB use was not associated with significant increase in adverse maternal or perinatal outcomes. The main barriers to the successful implementation of the initiatives were related to staff and hospital environment. There is insufficient evidence to indicate which intervention, or combination of interventions, is more effective to safely increase AVB use. More research is needed, especially in LMICs, including studies that design interventions taking into account theories of behaviour change. CRD42020215224.

Identifiants

pubmed: 36787978
pii: bmjopen-2022-070640
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-070640
pmc: PMC9930566
doi:

Types de publication

Systematic Review Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

e070640

Subventions

Organisme : World Health Organization
ID : 001
Pays : International

Informations de copyright

© World Health Organization 2023. Licensee BMJ.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Competing interests: BN and DG were authors of studies included in the review but were not involved in the analyses of these studies. All authors have no other conflicts of interest to declare.

Références

BMC Public Health. 2014 Jan 08;14:6
pubmed: 24397540
Syst Rev. 2014 Jun 20;3:67
pubmed: 24950727
Am J Perinatol. 2020 Nov;37(13):1296-1300
pubmed: 32455468
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2018 Jun;58(3):267-273
pubmed: 28960252
Health Policy Plan. 2012 Oct;27 Suppl 4:iv1-3
pubmed: 23014149
BMJ Glob Health. 2021 Jan;6(1):
pubmed: 33479018
Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Apr;135(4):e149-e159
pubmed: 32217976
BJOG. 2017 Aug;124(9):1335-1344
pubmed: 28139878
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2018 Jun 27;18(1):266
pubmed: 29945551
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2008 Sep;278(3):245-9
pubmed: 18189142
Bull World Health Organ. 2021 Nov 1;99(11):754-754A
pubmed: 34737464
PLoS One. 2016 Feb 05;11(2):e0148343
pubmed: 26849801
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Sep 24;9:CD012177
pubmed: 31549741
J Obstet Gynaecol India. 2019 Dec;69(6):558-560
pubmed: 31849391
BMJ. 2021 Mar 29;372:n71
pubmed: 33782057
BMJ. 2008 Sep 29;337:a1655
pubmed: 18824488
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2005 Oct;91(1):89-96
pubmed: 16109417
Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Mar;129(3):486-490
pubmed: 28178064
BMJ Glob Health. 2016 Sep 2;1(2):e000096
pubmed: 28588944
Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2021 Mar 19;7(1):72
pubmed: 33741082
BMJ. 2016 Oct 12;355:i4919
pubmed: 27733354
BMJ. 2004 Feb 7;328(7435):311
pubmed: 14724128
J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2021 Aug;43(8):1009-1012
pubmed: 33621680
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2022 Feb 22;22(1):145
pubmed: 35193510
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2010 Oct;111(1):8-12
pubmed: 20646704
Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Jul;130(1):151-158
pubmed: 28594775
BJOG. 2007 Jan;114(1):16-23
pubmed: 17010115
Niger Postgrad Med J. 2011 Sep;18(3):165-71
pubmed: 21909144
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2016 Sep 02;16:258
pubmed: 27590680
J Nepal Health Res Counc. 2017 Sep 08;15(2):178-181
pubmed: 29016591
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2011 May;204(5):448.e1-4
pubmed: 21333965
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2006 Jun;93(3):285-91
pubmed: 16687145
PLoS One. 2018 Apr 17;13(4):e0194906
pubmed: 29664907
BJOG. 2009 Oct;116 Suppl 1:22-5
pubmed: 19740166
Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM. 2021 May;3(3):100339
pubmed: 33631384
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Apr 26;21(1):384
pubmed: 33902568
S Afr Med J. 2018 Feb 01;108(2):75-78
pubmed: 29429433
Lancet. 2013 Jul 13;382(9887):146-57
pubmed: 23721752
Implement Sci. 2011 Apr 23;6:42
pubmed: 21513547
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2015 Aug;130(2):148-52
pubmed: 25979117
BMJ Open. 2013 Jan 03;3(1):
pubmed: 23293244
Lancet. 2001 Oct 13;358(9289):1203-7
pubmed: 11675055
Lancet. 2019 May 11;393(10184):1973-1982
pubmed: 30929893
Obstet Gynecol. 2007 Apr;109(4):917-21
pubmed: 17400854
Reprod Health. 2021 May 5;18(1):92
pubmed: 33952309
BJOG. 2005 Jul;112(7):986-90
pubmed: 15958005
Reprod Health. 2020 Jun 1;17(1):83
pubmed: 32487226
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2010;89(2):230-7
pubmed: 20121338
PLoS One. 2012;7(12):e49938
pubmed: 23236357
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2018 Jun 19;18(1):248
pubmed: 29914412
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2018 Jul;142(1):28-36
pubmed: 29630724

Auteurs

Maria Regina Torloni (MR)

Department of Medicine, Evidence Based Healthcare Post-Graduate Program, Sao Paulo Federal University, Sao Paulo, Brazil torlonimr@gmail.com.

Newton Opiyo (N)

UNDP/UNFPA/UNICEF/WHO/World Bank Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction (HRP) Department of Reproductive Health and Research, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.

Elena Altieri (E)

Behavioral Insights Unit, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.

Soha Sobhy (S)

Women's Health Research Unit, Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.

Shakila Thangaratinam (S)

Institute of Metabolism and Systems Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.

Barbara Nolens (B)

Department of Obstetrics, Canisius Wilhelmina Hospital, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

Diederike Geelhoed (D)

Provincial Directorate of Health, Tete Provincial Hospital, Cidade de Tete, Mozambique.

Ana Pilar Betran (AP)

UNDP/UNFPA/UNICEF/WHO/World Bank Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction (HRP) Department of Reproductive Health and Research, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH