Two-dimensional echocardiographic and strain values of the proximal thoracic aorta in a normal sub-Saharan African population.
Africa
Aorta dimensions and strain
Echocardiography
Normal African population
Journal
Echo research and practice
ISSN: 2055-0464
Titre abrégé: Echo Res Pract
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101664713
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
15 Feb 2023
15 Feb 2023
Historique:
received:
28
11
2022
accepted:
12
01
2023
entrez:
15
2
2023
pubmed:
16
2
2023
medline:
16
2
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
There is limited data regarding reference ranges for aortic dimensions in African populations. This study aims to establish normal reference ranges for echocardiographic dimensions and circumferential strain (CS) of the proximal thoracic aorta in a healthy sub-Saharan African population. This was a secondary analysis of data from a prospective cross-sectional study of 88 participants conducted at Chris Hani Baragwanath Hospital (2017-2019). Aortic measurements were obtained as per the 2015 American Society of Echocardiography guidelines using a Philips iE33 system. Circumferential Strain was measured using Philips QLAB version 11.0 software offline semi-automated analysis of speckle-based strain 2-D speckle-tracking software (Amsterdam, The Netherlands). Mean age was 37.22 ± 10.79 years (41% male). The mean diameter at the aortic annulus, sinuses, sino-tubular junction (STJ) and ascending aorta (AAO) were 19.11 ± 2.38 mm, 27.40 ± 6.11 mm, 25.32 ± 3.52 mm and 25.36 ± 3.38 mm, respectively. Males had larger absolute and indexed aortic diameters at all levels when compared to females. The mean aorta CS was 11.97 ± 5.05%. There was no significant difference in CS based on gender (12.19 ± 5.04% vs 11.51 ± 5.02%, P = 0.267). On multivariate linear regression analysis, male sex was the most significant predictor of increased diameter at the level of the aortic annulus (r = 0.17, P = 0.014), body surface area was the most significant predictor at the sinuses (r = 0.17, P = 0.014) and AAO (r = 0.30, P < 0.001), while age was the most significant predictor at the STJ (r = 0.27, P = 0.004). There was a negative correlation between age and aortic CS (r = - 0.12, P < 0.001). The most important predictor of aorta CS was age, on multivariate analysis (r = - 0.19, P = 0.024). This study provides normal reference ranges for dimensions of the proximal aorta and circumferential strain (CS) in a sub-Saharan African population according to age, sex, and body habitus. It serves as a platform for future larger studies and allows for risk stratification of cardiovascular disease in an African population.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
There is limited data regarding reference ranges for aortic dimensions in African populations. This study aims to establish normal reference ranges for echocardiographic dimensions and circumferential strain (CS) of the proximal thoracic aorta in a healthy sub-Saharan African population.
METHODS
METHODS
This was a secondary analysis of data from a prospective cross-sectional study of 88 participants conducted at Chris Hani Baragwanath Hospital (2017-2019). Aortic measurements were obtained as per the 2015 American Society of Echocardiography guidelines using a Philips iE33 system. Circumferential Strain was measured using Philips QLAB version 11.0 software offline semi-automated analysis of speckle-based strain 2-D speckle-tracking software (Amsterdam, The Netherlands).
RESULTS
RESULTS
Mean age was 37.22 ± 10.79 years (41% male). The mean diameter at the aortic annulus, sinuses, sino-tubular junction (STJ) and ascending aorta (AAO) were 19.11 ± 2.38 mm, 27.40 ± 6.11 mm, 25.32 ± 3.52 mm and 25.36 ± 3.38 mm, respectively. Males had larger absolute and indexed aortic diameters at all levels when compared to females. The mean aorta CS was 11.97 ± 5.05%. There was no significant difference in CS based on gender (12.19 ± 5.04% vs 11.51 ± 5.02%, P = 0.267). On multivariate linear regression analysis, male sex was the most significant predictor of increased diameter at the level of the aortic annulus (r = 0.17, P = 0.014), body surface area was the most significant predictor at the sinuses (r = 0.17, P = 0.014) and AAO (r = 0.30, P < 0.001), while age was the most significant predictor at the STJ (r = 0.27, P = 0.004). There was a negative correlation between age and aortic CS (r = - 0.12, P < 0.001). The most important predictor of aorta CS was age, on multivariate analysis (r = - 0.19, P = 0.024).
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
This study provides normal reference ranges for dimensions of the proximal aorta and circumferential strain (CS) in a sub-Saharan African population according to age, sex, and body habitus. It serves as a platform for future larger studies and allows for risk stratification of cardiovascular disease in an African population.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36788589
doi: 10.1186/s44156-023-00016-x
pii: 10.1186/s44156-023-00016-x
pmc: PMC9930330
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
2Informations de copyright
© 2023. The Author(s).
Références
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2013 Feb;45(2):135-40
pubmed: 23267698
Exp Mol Pathol. 1980 Aug;33(1):15-24
pubmed: 7409083
J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2013 Apr;26(4):419-27
pubmed: 23337735
Intern Emerg Med. 2014 Jun;9(4):411-7
pubmed: 23568317
J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2015 May;28(5):570-9
pubmed: 25753502
Am J Pathol. 1991 Nov;139(5):1119-29
pubmed: 1951629
Am J Cardiol. 2014 Sep 15;114(6):921-7
pubmed: 25108304
Am J Cardiol. 2019 Jun 15;123(12):2015-2021
pubmed: 30955867
Exp Ther Med. 2013 Feb;5(2):406-410
pubmed: 23439780
J Thorac Dis. 2017 Dec;9(12):5404-5422
pubmed: 29312752
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015 Mar;16(3):233-70
pubmed: 25712077
Circ J. 2008 Nov;72(11):1859-66
pubmed: 18827372
Circulation. 1995 Feb 1;91(3):734-40
pubmed: 7828301
J Cardiovasc Ultrasound. 2015 Sep;23(3):158-72
pubmed: 26448824
Echocardiography. 2022 Apr;39(4):576-583
pubmed: 35261079
J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2015 Jan;28(1):1-39.e14
pubmed: 25559473
Am J Cardiol. 1989 Sep 1;64(8):507-12
pubmed: 2773795
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2017 Feb;18(2):167-179
pubmed: 27044913
J Cardiol. 2011 May;57(3):354-9
pubmed: 21333499
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2016 Mar;17(3):233-46
pubmed: 26546802
J Hypertens. 2001 Dec;19(12):2205-12
pubmed: 11725165
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2009 Apr 24;11:9
pubmed: 19393079