Non-invasive mapping of epileptogenic networks predicts surgical outcome.
epilepsy
functional connectivity
high-density electroencephalography
magnetoencephalography
source localization
Journal
Brain : a journal of neurology
ISSN: 1460-2156
Titre abrégé: Brain
Pays: England
ID NLM: 0372537
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
02 05 2023
02 05 2023
Historique:
received:
15
06
2022
revised:
03
11
2022
accepted:
30
11
2022
medline:
3
5
2023
pubmed:
16
2
2023
entrez:
15
2
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Epilepsy is increasingly considered a disorder of brain networks. Studying these networks with functional connectivity can help identify hubs that facilitate the spread of epileptiform activity. Surgical resection of these hubs may lead patients who suffer from drug-resistant epilepsy to seizure freedom. Here, we aim to map non-invasively epileptogenic networks, through the virtual implantation of sensors estimated with electric and magnetic source imaging, in patients with drug-resistant epilepsy. We hypothesize that highly connected hubs identified non-invasively with source imaging can predict the epileptogenic zone and the surgical outcome better than spikes localized with conventional source localization methods (dipoles). We retrospectively analysed simultaneous high-density electroencephalography (EEG) and magnetoencephalography data recorded from 37 children and young adults with drug-resistant epilepsy who underwent neurosurgery. Using source imaging, we estimated virtual sensors at locations where intracranial EEG contacts were placed. On data with and without spikes, we computed undirected functional connectivity between sensors/contacts using amplitude envelope correlation and phase locking value for physiologically relevant frequency bands. From each functional connectivity matrix, we generated an undirected network containing the strongest connections within sensors/contacts using the minimum spanning tree. For each sensor/contact, we computed graph centrality measures. We compared functional connectivity and their derived graph centrality of sensors/contacts inside resection for good (n = 22, ILAE I) and poor (n = 15, ILAE II-VI) outcome patients, tested their ability to predict the epileptogenic zone in good-outcome patients, examined the association between highly connected hubs removal and surgical outcome and performed leave-one-out cross-validation to support their prognostic value. We also compared the predictive values of functional connectivity with those of dipoles. Finally, we tested the reliability of virtual sensor measures via Spearman's correlation with intracranial EEG at population- and patient-level. We observed higher functional connectivity inside than outside resection (P < 0.05, Wilcoxon signed-rank test) for good-outcome patients, on data with and without spikes across different bands for intracranial EEG and electric/magnetic source imaging and few differences for poor-outcome patients. These functional connectivity measures were predictive of both the epileptogenic zone and outcome (positive and negative predictive values ≥55%, validated using leave-one-out cross-validation) outperforming dipoles on spikes. Significant correlations were found between source imaging and intracranial EEG measures (0.4 ≤ rho ≤ 0.9, P < 0.05). Our findings suggest that virtual implantation of sensors through source imaging can non-invasively identify highly connected hubs in patients with drug-resistant epilepsy, even in the absence of frank epileptiform activity. Surgical resection of these hubs predicts outcome better than dipoles.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36789500
pii: 7038563
doi: 10.1093/brain/awac477
pmc: PMC10151194
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1916-1931Subventions
Organisme : NINDS NIH HHS
ID : R21 NS101373
Pays : United States
Organisme : NINDS NIH HHS
ID : R01 NS104116
Pays : United States
Informations de copyright
© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Guarantors of Brain.
Références
Neurosurgery. 2020 Jun 1;86(6):792-801
pubmed: 31814011
Neuroimage. 2015 Aug 15;117:439-48
pubmed: 25862259
Clin Neurophysiol. 2019 Apr;130(4):491-504
pubmed: 30771726
Neuroimage. 2013 Nov 15;82:564-73
pubmed: 23792218
J Neural Eng. 2020 Jun 12;17(3):035007
pubmed: 32191632
Neuroimage Clin. 2015 May 23;8:503-15
pubmed: 26106575
Int J Psychophysiol. 2014 Jun;92(3):129-38
pubmed: 24726900
Neuroreport. 2000 May 15;11(7):1509-14
pubmed: 10841367
Pediatrics. 2017 May;139(5):
pubmed: 28557750
Pediatrics. 2011 Dec;128(6):e1532-43
pubmed: 22123895
Sci Rep. 2019 Sep 16;9(1):13412
pubmed: 31527782
Epilepsia. 2011 Jan;52(1):84-93
pubmed: 21126244
Brain. 2019 Apr 1;142(4):932-951
pubmed: 30805596
PLoS Comput Biol. 2008 Oct;4(10):e1000196
pubmed: 18846206
Brain. 2015 Aug;138(Pt 8):2249-62
pubmed: 25981965
Epilepsy Curr. 2018 Jan-Feb;18(1):12-16
pubmed: 29844752
Clin Neurophysiol. 2022 Jul;139:49-57
pubmed: 35526353
Epilepsia. 2013 Aug;54(8):1409-18
pubmed: 23647147
Epilepsia Open. 2022 Dec;7(4):674-686
pubmed: 36053171
Neuroimage Clin. 2019;23:101908
pubmed: 31491812
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2021 Nov;2021:2668-2671
pubmed: 34891801
Nat Commun. 2022 Feb 22;13(1):994
pubmed: 35194035
Neuroimage. 2014 Apr 15;90:423-35
pubmed: 24321555
Brain. 2022 Nov 21;145(11):3901-3915
pubmed: 36412516
Neuroimage. 2014 Feb 1;86:354-63
pubmed: 24128736
J Neurosurg. 2003 May;98(5):1017-26
pubmed: 12744361
Epilepsia. 2001 Feb;42(2):282-6
pubmed: 11240604
Epilepsia. 2011 Jan;52 Suppl 1:7-12
pubmed: 21214534
Comput Intell Neurosci. 2011;2011:879716
pubmed: 21584256
Neuroimage Clin. 2018 Jun 02;19:758-766
pubmed: 30009129
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2012 Dec;83(12):1238-48
pubmed: 22917671
Ann Clin Transl Neurol. 2020 Mar;7(3):329-342
pubmed: 32096612
Pediatr Neurol. 2015 Sep;53(3):216-20
pubmed: 26138748
Neurosurgery. 2014 Jun;74(6):569-84; discussion 584-5
pubmed: 24618797
Front Neurol. 2020 Sep 24;11:563847
pubmed: 33071948
Front Hum Neurosci. 2015 Feb 18;9:21
pubmed: 25741260
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 1997 Sep;44(9):867-80
pubmed: 9282479
Front Neurosci. 2019 Mar 14;13:211
pubmed: 30930736
Sci Rep. 2022 Mar 8;12(1):4086
pubmed: 35260657
J Vis Exp. 2016 Dec 6;(118):
pubmed: 28060325
PLoS One. 2015 Mar 11;10(3):e0118753
pubmed: 25761059
Ann Neurol. 2021 May;89(5):911-925
pubmed: 33710676
Clin Neurophysiol. 2020 Mar;131(3):734-743
pubmed: 32007920
Clin Neurophysiol. 2001 Apr;112(4):713-9
pubmed: 11275545
Front Physiol. 2021 Jan 28;11:611125
pubmed: 33633576
Epilepsy Behav. 2021 May;118:107911
pubmed: 33773441
Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 Jul;98(30):e16402
pubmed: 31348240
Brain. 2017 Feb;140(2):319-332
pubmed: 28011454
Brain. 2019 Dec 1;142(12):3892-3905
pubmed: 31599323
Nat Rev Neurol. 2019 Oct;15(10):594-606
pubmed: 31341275
Brain. 2018 Oct 1;141(10):2966-2980
pubmed: 30107499
Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2022 Feb;213:107086
pubmed: 35063723
Biomed Eng Online. 2010 Sep 06;9:45
pubmed: 20819204
Front Neurol. 2021 Oct 14;12:722986
pubmed: 34721261
Diagnostics (Basel). 2021 Jul 09;11(7):
pubmed: 34359317
Front Hum Neurosci. 2013 Apr 15;7:138
pubmed: 23596409
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2021 Nov;2021:408-411
pubmed: 34891320
Lancet Neurol. 2016 Apr;15(4):420-33
pubmed: 26925532
Brain. 2019 Sep 1;142(9):2688-2704
pubmed: 31305885
N Engl J Med. 2017 Oct 26;377(17):1639-1647
pubmed: 29069568
Hum Brain Mapp. 1999;8(4):194-208
pubmed: 10619414
Anesth Analg. 2018 May;126(5):1763-1768
pubmed: 29481436
Epilepsia. 2017 Jan;58(1):137-148
pubmed: 27888520
Front Neurosci. 2018 Aug 03;12:506
pubmed: 30127710
Epilepsy Behav. 2015 Sep;50:10-3
pubmed: 26093217
PLoS One. 2011;6(5):e20071
pubmed: 21625517
Neuroimage. 2015 Mar;108:23-33
pubmed: 25534110
Epileptic Disord. 2006 Aug;8 Suppl 2:S1-9
pubmed: 17012067
Neurology. 2016 Dec 6;87(23):2483-2489
pubmed: 27920283