Psychometric Evaluation of GHQ-12 as a Screening Tool for Psychological Impairment of Healthcare Workers Facing COVID-19 Pandemic.
Journal
La Medicina del lavoro
ISSN: 0025-7818
Titre abrégé: Med Lav
Pays: Italy
ID NLM: 0401176
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
14 Feb 2023
14 Feb 2023
Historique:
received:
09
11
2022
accepted:
23
01
2023
entrez:
15
2
2023
pubmed:
16
2
2023
medline:
18
2
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The General Health Questionnaire (GHQ) is a widely used tool, both in clinical and research settings, due to its brevity and easy administration. Researchers often adopt a dichotomous measurement method, considering a total score above or below a certain threshold. This leads to an extreme simplification of the gathered data and therefore to the loss of clinical details. In a multi-step evaluation study aimed at assessing health care workers' mental health during the Covid-19 pandemic, GHQ-12 proved to be the most effective tool to detect psychological distress compared to other scales adopted. These results led to deepen the understanding of GHQ-12 properties through a statistical study by focusing on items' properties and characteristics. GHQ-12 responses were analyzed using Item Response Theory (IRT), a suitable method for scale assessment. Instead of considering the single overall score, in which each item accounts equally, it focuses on individual items' characteristics. Moreover, IRT models were applied combined with the latent class (LC) analysis, aiming to the determination of subgroups of individuals according to their level of psychological distress. GHQ-12 was administered to 990 health-care workers and responses were scored using the binary method (0-0-1-1). We applied the two-parameter logistic (2-PL) model, finding that the items showed different ways of responses and features. The latent class analysis classified subjects into three sub-groups according to their responses to GHQ-12 only: 47% of individuals with general well-being, 38% expressing signs of discomfort without severity and 15% of subjects with a high level of impairment. This result almost reproduces subjects' classification obtained after administering the six questionnaires of the study protocol. Accurate statistical techniques and a deep understanding of the latent factors underlying the GHQ-12 resulted in a more effective usage of such psychometric questionnaire - i.e. a more refined gathering of data and a significant time and resource efficiency. We underlined the need to maximize the extraction of data from questionnaires and the necessity of them being less lengthy and repetitive.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
The General Health Questionnaire (GHQ) is a widely used tool, both in clinical and research settings, due to its brevity and easy administration. Researchers often adopt a dichotomous measurement method, considering a total score above or below a certain threshold. This leads to an extreme simplification of the gathered data and therefore to the loss of clinical details. In a multi-step evaluation study aimed at assessing health care workers' mental health during the Covid-19 pandemic, GHQ-12 proved to be the most effective tool to detect psychological distress compared to other scales adopted. These results led to deepen the understanding of GHQ-12 properties through a statistical study by focusing on items' properties and characteristics.
METHODS
METHODS
GHQ-12 responses were analyzed using Item Response Theory (IRT), a suitable method for scale assessment. Instead of considering the single overall score, in which each item accounts equally, it focuses on individual items' characteristics. Moreover, IRT models were applied combined with the latent class (LC) analysis, aiming to the determination of subgroups of individuals according to their level of psychological distress.
RESULTS
RESULTS
GHQ-12 was administered to 990 health-care workers and responses were scored using the binary method (0-0-1-1). We applied the two-parameter logistic (2-PL) model, finding that the items showed different ways of responses and features. The latent class analysis classified subjects into three sub-groups according to their responses to GHQ-12 only: 47% of individuals with general well-being, 38% expressing signs of discomfort without severity and 15% of subjects with a high level of impairment. This result almost reproduces subjects' classification obtained after administering the six questionnaires of the study protocol.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
Accurate statistical techniques and a deep understanding of the latent factors underlying the GHQ-12 resulted in a more effective usage of such psychometric questionnaire - i.e. a more refined gathering of data and a significant time and resource efficiency. We underlined the need to maximize the extraction of data from questionnaires and the necessity of them being less lengthy and repetitive.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36790406
doi: 10.23749/mdl.v114i1.13918
pmc: PMC9987474
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e2023009Références
Arch Intern Med. 2006 May 22;166(10):1092-7
pubmed: 16717171
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 1991 May;26(3):132-8
pubmed: 1887291
Front Psychol. 2021 Apr 09;12:632999
pubmed: 33897540
Front Psychiatry. 2022 Mar 10;13:834753
pubmed: 35356719
Br J Psychiatry. 1979 Apr;134:446-7
pubmed: 444799
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2010 Apr 30;8:45
pubmed: 20433690
J Affect Disord. 2021 Dec 1;295:405-409
pubmed: 34507219
J Biomed Inform. 2019 Jul;95:103208
pubmed: 31078660
Lancet Public Health. 2020 Sep;5(9):e475-e483
pubmed: 32745512
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Mar 10;18(6):
pubmed: 33801912
Front Public Health. 2021 May 17;9:646780
pubmed: 34079783
BMC Public Health. 2020 Nov 2;20(1):1636
pubmed: 33138798
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2016 May 20;16:58
pubmed: 27206714
Front Psychol. 2020 Oct 15;11:588762
pubmed: 33178088
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2021 Nov 14;19(1):255
pubmed: 34775961
Psychol Med. 1989 May;19(2):469-85
pubmed: 2762448
Psychol Med. 1997 Jan;27(1):191-7
pubmed: 9122299
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2021 Aug 10;21(1):163
pubmed: 34376151
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2012 Jun 11;12:74
pubmed: 22686586
J Nerv Ment Dis. 1986 Dec;174(12):727-35
pubmed: 3783140
Psychopharmacol Bull. 1973 Jan;9(1):13-28
pubmed: 4682398
Br J Psychiatry. 2016 Aug;209(2):162-8
pubmed: 26635327
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2022 Mar;57(3):633-645
pubmed: 35064280
PLoS One. 2018 Nov 26;13(11):e0206915
pubmed: 30475823
J Gen Intern Med. 2001 Sep;16(9):606-13
pubmed: 11556941