Machine Learning Analysis of Postkeratoplasty Endothelial Cell Images for the Prediction of Future Graft Rejection.
Journal
Translational vision science & technology
ISSN: 2164-2591
Titre abrégé: Transl Vis Sci Technol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101595919
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 02 2023
01 02 2023
Historique:
entrez:
15
2
2023
pubmed:
16
2
2023
medline:
18
2
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
This study developed machine learning (ML) classifiers of postoperative corneal endothelial cell images to identify postkeratoplasty patients at risk for allograft rejection within 1 to 24 months of treatment. Central corneal endothelium specular microscopic images were obtained from 44 patients after Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK), half of whom had experienced graft rejection. After deep learning segmentation of images from all patients' last and second-to-last imaging, time points prior to rejection were analyzed (175 and 168, respectively), and 432 quantitative features were extracted assessing cellular spatial arrangements and cell intensity values. Random forest (RF) and logistic regression (LR) models were trained on novel-to-this-application features from single time points, delta-radiomics, and traditional morphometrics (endothelial cell density, coefficient of variation, hexagonality) via 10 iterations of threefold cross-validation. Final assessments were evaluated on a held-out test set. ML classifiers trained on novel-to-this-application features outperformed those trained on traditional morphometrics for predicting future graft rejection. RF and LR models predicted post-DMEK patients' allograft rejection in the held-out test set with >0.80 accuracy. RF models trained on novel features from second-to-last time points and delta-radiomics predicted post-DMEK patients' rejection with >0.70 accuracy. Cell-graph spatial arrangement, intensity, and shape features were most indicative of graft rejection. ML classifiers successfully predicted future graft rejections 1 to 24 months prior to clinically apparent rejection. This technology could aid clinicians to identify patients at risk for graft rejection and guide treatment plans accordingly. Our software applies ML techniques to clinical images and enhances patient care by detecting preclinical keratoplasty rejection.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36790821
pii: 2785378
doi: 10.1167/tvst.12.2.22
pmc: PMC9940770
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
22Subventions
Organisme : NEI NIH HHS
ID : P30 EY011373
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIBIB NIH HHS
ID : T32 EB007509
Pays : United States
Organisme : NEI NIH HHS
ID : U10 EY020798
Pays : United States
Organisme : NEI NIH HHS
ID : R21 EY029498
Pays : United States
Organisme : NEI NIH HHS
ID : U10 EY012358
Pays : United States
Références
Sci Rep. 2022 Aug 18;12(1):14035
pubmed: 35982194
Ophthalmology. 2018 Sep;125(9):1410-1420
pubmed: 29653860
Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi. 1994 Jan;30(1):14-5
pubmed: 8082464
Am J Ophthalmol. 1991 Jun 15;111(6):739-42
pubmed: 2039046
Am J Ophthalmol. 2014 Sep;158(3):485-95
pubmed: 24879945
CLAO J. 1996 Apr;22(2):122-6
pubmed: 8728619
Am J Ophthalmol. 2012 Oct;154(4):762-3
pubmed: 22995566
Am J Ophthalmol. 1985 Dec 15;100(6):783-8
pubmed: 4073174
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2014 Jul;40(7):1116-21
pubmed: 24957432
PLoS One. 2019 Dec 13;14(12):e0226348
pubmed: 31834910
J Optom. 2018 Jul - Sep;11(3):182-191
pubmed: 28797649
United European Gastroenterol J. 2016 Apr;4(2):257-63
pubmed: 27087955
Sci Rep. 2015 Aug 17;5:13087
pubmed: 26278466
Cancer Lett. 2017 Sep 10;403:21-27
pubmed: 28610955
Ophthalmology. 2017 Apr;124(4):512-518
pubmed: 28094043
JAMA. 2017 Dec 12;318(22):2211-2223
pubmed: 29234807
BMC Med Imaging. 2015 Apr 26;15:13
pubmed: 25928199
Ophthalmology. 2011 Apr;118(4):725-9
pubmed: 21035862
JAMA Ophthalmol. 2018 Jul 1;136(7):803-810
pubmed: 29801159
JAMA Ophthalmol. 2021 Feb 1;139(2):191-197
pubmed: 33355637
JAMA Ophthalmol. 2017 Nov 1;135(11):1170-1176
pubmed: 28973096
Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2020 Aug 21;9(2):49
pubmed: 32884856
Am J Ophthalmol. 1984 Oct 15;98(4):401-10
pubmed: 6486211
Cornea. 1990 Apr;9(2):92-7
pubmed: 2328589
Am J Ophthalmol. 2005 Feb;139(2):311-9
pubmed: 15733993
Br J Ophthalmol. 2017 Jul;101(7):902-908
pubmed: 27836829
Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2018 Jul;160:11-23
pubmed: 29728238
Curr Eye Res. 2013 Feb;38(2):260-5
pubmed: 23294140
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1985 Nov;26(11):1489-501
pubmed: 3863808
Cornea. 2010 May;29(5):523-7
pubmed: 20299973
Ophthalmology. 1998 Oct;105(10):1855-65
pubmed: 9787355
Sci Rep. 2019 Mar 18;9(1):4752
pubmed: 30894636
Ophthalmology. 2018 Aug;125(8):1199-1206
pubmed: 29506863
Ophthalmology. 2016 Jul;123(7):1421-7
pubmed: 27108095
J Med Imaging (Bellingham). 2020 Jan;7(1):014503
pubmed: 32090135
Am J Ophthalmol. 2000 Apr;129(4):468-71
pubmed: 10764855
NPJ Digit Med. 2018 Aug 28;1:39
pubmed: 31304320
Ophthalmology. 2017 Jul;124(7):962-969
pubmed: 28359545
Am J Optom Physiol Opt. 1980 May;57(5):267-74
pubmed: 7386590
Ophthalmology. 2015 Mar;122(3):464-70
pubmed: 25439596
Exp Eye Res. 2012 Feb;95(1):40-7
pubmed: 21689649
Acta Ophthalmol. 2020 May;98(3):261-266
pubmed: 31486268
Ophthalmology. 2010 Mar;117(3):438-44
pubmed: 20031230
JAMA Ophthalmol. 2017 Dec 1;135(12):1394-1400
pubmed: 29127432
Am J Ophthalmol. 2018 Dec;196:197-207
pubmed: 30308200
Ophthalmology. 2018 Nov;125(11):1700-1709
pubmed: 30098353
Ophthalmology. 2012 Jan;119(1):90-4
pubmed: 22115709
Am J Ophthalmol. 2019 Jul;203:78-88
pubmed: 30849341
Am J Ophthalmol. 2020 Sep;217:114-120
pubmed: 32283096
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2016 Oct 01;57(13):5200-5206
pubmed: 27701631
Ophthalmology. 2013 Feb;120(2):246-51
pubmed: 23107581
Ophthalmology. 2016 Jun;123(6):1232-6
pubmed: 26983976
Nat Med. 2018 Sep;24(9):1342-1350
pubmed: 30104768
Am J Ophthalmol. 1986 Jul 15;102(1):50-7
pubmed: 3728624
Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2022 Sep 1;33(5):407-417
pubmed: 35819899
Cornea. 2001 Aug;20(6):560-9
pubmed: 11473153
Ophthalmol Sci. 2022 Mar 07;2(2):100141
pubmed: 36249707
Am J Ophthalmol. 2016 Sep;169:218-226
pubmed: 27423793
Invest Ophthalmol. 1974 Dec;13(12):1033-7
pubmed: 4430572
Ophthalmology. 1984 Oct;91(10):1147-53
pubmed: 6514282