Perceived social support in solo women seeking treatment with donor gametes and in women in heterosexual couples seeking IVF-treatment with own gametes.
Journal
Scientific reports
ISSN: 2045-2322
Titre abrégé: Sci Rep
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101563288
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
15 02 2023
15 02 2023
Historique:
received:
12
12
2021
accepted:
06
02
2023
entrez:
15
2
2023
pubmed:
16
2
2023
medline:
18
2
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Solo motherhood is a family constellation that is becoming increasingly common in high income countries. The demographic characteristics of solo women entering treatment with donated sperm or embryo have been shown to be different from that of cohabiting women. The general importance of perceived social support is frequently amplified when health and quality of life are concerned, and positively affects mental health status, experienced stress, perceived self-efficacy during the transition to parenthood and during parenthood itself. The objective of the present study was to compare demographic characteristics, social network and perceived social support among solo women and cohabiting women awaiting fertility treatment. This objective was explored with a study-specific demographic and background questionnaire as well as through questions on access to practical support and the Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support (MSPSS) assessing different sources of support. This study is a part of a longitudinal prospective multicenter study of solo women who awaited donation treatment in six Swedish public and private fertility clinics and a comparison group of women who were cohabiting/married to male partner and awaited in vitro fertilization (IVF) treatment with the couple's own gametes. A total of 670 women were invited and 463 accepted participation (69% response rate); 207 solo women (study group) and 256 cohabiting women (comparison group). The results show significant differences in age, education, and employment between the groups. Solo women were on average 3.6 years older, had a higher level of education, a higher-income profession, and were more frequently working full time. Solo women perceived an equally high degree of social support from their families, significantly higher levels of support from friends and significantly lower support from a significant other compared to cohabiting women. Solo women expected their mother to be the most supportive person in future parenthood, while cohabiting women most often stated their cohabiting partner to fill that role. The study adds to the body of knowledge of solo women as a sociodemographic distinct group going at motherhood alone, stating a high degree of currently perceived and expected social support. The previously studied negative impact that lack of a co-parent might have, may be attenuated by the expected and perceived social support from family and friends.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36792663
doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-29441-y
pii: 10.1038/s41598-023-29441-y
pmc: PMC9931690
doi:
Types de publication
Multicenter Study
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
2733Informations de copyright
© 2023. The Author(s).
Références
Hum Fertil (Camb). 2009 Dec;12(4):175-84
pubmed: 19895361
J Affect Disord. 2020 Mar 15;265:372-380
pubmed: 32090762
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2013 Oct 10;11:168
pubmed: 24112950
J Fam Psychol. 2010 Apr;24(2):175-87
pubmed: 20438193
Hum Fertil (Camb). 2016 Apr;19(1):48-55
pubmed: 27006139
Am J Mens Health. 2017 Sep;11(5):1376-1384
pubmed: 26385988
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2007 Jan;42(1):6-13
pubmed: 17203237
Dev Psychol. 2016 Jan;52(1):143-54
pubmed: 26501727
J Pers Assess. 1990 Winter;55(3-4):610-7
pubmed: 2280326
Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2021 Jan;70:92-100
pubmed: 32741623
BMJ Open. 2020 Dec 12;10(12):e041538
pubmed: 33310805
J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 1997 Oct;38(7):783-91
pubmed: 9363577
J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 1998 Nov;39(8):1083-95
pubmed: 9844979
BMC Psychiatry. 2018 May 29;18(1):156
pubmed: 29843662
Gesundheitswesen. 2019 Dec;81(12):977-985
pubmed: 30321874
Anthropol Med. 2018 Dec;25(3):249-264
pubmed: 28752772
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2015 May;94(5):473-81
pubmed: 25847078
Sex Reprod Healthc. 2021 Feb;27:100586
pubmed: 33340880
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2020 Nov 13;75(10):2250-2262
pubmed: 31628843
Women Health. 2017 Feb;57(2):154-172
pubmed: 26909523
J Fam Psychol. 2021 Mar;35(2):192-202
pubmed: 32940489
Acta Med Port. 2019 Mar 29;32(3):219-226
pubmed: 30946794
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2019 Mar 13;19(1):92
pubmed: 30866838
J Fam Psychol. 2016 Jun;30(4):409-18
pubmed: 26866836
Curr Opin Psychol. 2017 Jun;15:76-80
pubmed: 28813274
Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Jan;123(1):104-112
pubmed: 24463670
Int J Aging Hum Dev. 2020 Oct;91(3):340-355
pubmed: 31646888
Hum Fertil (Camb). 2021 Jul;24(3):219-225
pubmed: 31037982
J Multidiscip Healthc. 2020 Jan 16;13:53-61
pubmed: 32021234
Child Care Health Dev. 2011 Sep;37(5):679-91
pubmed: 21143271
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2003 Aug;38(8):442-9
pubmed: 12910340
J Affect Disord. 2019 Jan 1;242:255-264
pubmed: 30218920
J Reprod Infant Psychol. 2021 Jul;39(3):301-312
pubmed: 32009465
PLoS One. 2017 Oct 17;12(10):e0186287
pubmed: 29040334
Sex Reprod Healthc. 2017 Jun;12:58-63
pubmed: 28477933
Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2017 Sep;26(9):1105-1117
pubmed: 28500384
J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2004 Nov;45(8):1407-19
pubmed: 15482501