Endoscopic features and clinical course of colorectal carcinoma resected by cold snare polypectomy.
Carcinoma
Colorectal neoplasm
Endoscopy
Histology
Polyps
Journal
Journal of gastroenterology and hepatology
ISSN: 1440-1746
Titre abrégé: J Gastroenterol Hepatol
Pays: Australia
ID NLM: 8607909
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jun 2023
Jun 2023
Historique:
revised:
09
02
2023
received:
26
12
2022
accepted:
13
02
2023
medline:
19
6
2023
pubmed:
17
2
2023
entrez:
16
2
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Cold snare polypectomy is commonly performed to remove small colorectal polyps. Accidental resection of carcinomas during this procedure has been reported. Herein, we aimed to clarify the clinicopathological features and clinical course of colorectal carcinomas resected by cold snare polypectomy. This multicenter retrospective cohort study was conducted at 10 Japanese healthcare centers. Of the colorectal lesions resected by cold snare polypectomy between April 2016 and March 2020, lesions pathologically diagnosed as carcinoma were reviewed. Centralized histology (based on the Vienna classification) and endoscopic reviews were performed. The study endpoints were endoscopic features and clinical outcomes of cold snare polypectomy-resected colorectal carcinomas (Vienna category ≥4.2). We reviewed 74 of the 70 693 lesions resected by cold snare polypectomy. After a central pathological review, 68 lesions were diagnosed as carcinomas. The Japan Narrow-band imaging Expert Team (JNET) classification type 2B, lesion size ≥6 mm, and multinodular morphology were the significant endoscopic predictors of carcinoma resected by cold snare polypectomy. No adverse events related to the procedure occurred. Sixty-three lesions were diagnosed as carcinomas within the mucosal layer, and 34 were curative resections. Of the five carcinoma lesions with submucosal invasion, additional surgery revealed remnant cancer tissues in one lesion. No local or metastatic recurrence was observed during follow-up. Although most of the carcinomas resected by cold snare polypectomy were within the mucosal layer, few lesions invading the submucosa were identified. Careful pre-procedural endoscopic evaluation, especially focusing on the JNET classification and multinodular morphology, is recommended.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND AND AIM
OBJECTIVE
Cold snare polypectomy is commonly performed to remove small colorectal polyps. Accidental resection of carcinomas during this procedure has been reported. Herein, we aimed to clarify the clinicopathological features and clinical course of colorectal carcinomas resected by cold snare polypectomy.
METHODS
METHODS
This multicenter retrospective cohort study was conducted at 10 Japanese healthcare centers. Of the colorectal lesions resected by cold snare polypectomy between April 2016 and March 2020, lesions pathologically diagnosed as carcinoma were reviewed. Centralized histology (based on the Vienna classification) and endoscopic reviews were performed. The study endpoints were endoscopic features and clinical outcomes of cold snare polypectomy-resected colorectal carcinomas (Vienna category ≥4.2).
RESULTS
RESULTS
We reviewed 74 of the 70 693 lesions resected by cold snare polypectomy. After a central pathological review, 68 lesions were diagnosed as carcinomas. The Japan Narrow-band imaging Expert Team (JNET) classification type 2B, lesion size ≥6 mm, and multinodular morphology were the significant endoscopic predictors of carcinoma resected by cold snare polypectomy. No adverse events related to the procedure occurred. Sixty-three lesions were diagnosed as carcinomas within the mucosal layer, and 34 were curative resections. Of the five carcinoma lesions with submucosal invasion, additional surgery revealed remnant cancer tissues in one lesion. No local or metastatic recurrence was observed during follow-up.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
Although most of the carcinomas resected by cold snare polypectomy were within the mucosal layer, few lesions invading the submucosa were identified. Careful pre-procedural endoscopic evaluation, especially focusing on the JNET classification and multinodular morphology, is recommended.
Types de publication
Review
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
948-954Informations de copyright
© 2023 Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Foundation and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.
Références
Winawer SJ, Zauber AG, Ho MN et al. Prevention of colorectal cancer by colonoscopic polypectomy. The National Polyp Study Workgroup. N. Engl. J. Med. 1993; 329: 1977-1981. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM199312303292701
Zauber AG, Winawer SJ, O'Brien MJ et al. Colonoscopic polypectomy and long-term prevention of colorectal-cancer deaths. N. Engl. J. Med. 2012; 366: 687-696. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1100370
Shinozaki S, Kobayashi Y, Hayashi Y, Sakamoto H, Lefor AK, Yamamoto H. Efficacy and safety of cold versus hot snare polypectomy for resecting small colorectal polyps: systematic review and meta-analysis. Dig. Endosc. 2018; 30: 592-599. https://doi.org/10.1111/den.13173
Takeuchi Y, Shichijo S, Uedo N et al. Safety and efficacy of cold versus hot snare polypectomy including colorectal polyps ≥1 cm in size. Dig. Endosc. 2022; 34: 274-283. https://doi.org/10.1111/den.14096
Tutticci N, Burgess NG, Pellise M, Mcleod D, Bourke MJ. Characterization and significance of protrusions in the mucosal defect after cold snare polypectomy. Gastrointest. Endosc. 2015; 82: 523-528. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2015.01.051
Shichijo S, Takeuchi Y, Kitamura M et al. Does cold snare polypectomy completely resect the mucosal layer? A prospective single-center observational trial. J. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2020; 35: 241-248. https://doi.org/10.1111/jgh.14824
Iwai T, Imai K, Hotta K et al. Endoscopic prediction of advanced histology in diminutive and small colorectal polyps. J. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2019; 34: 397-403. https://doi.org/10.1111/jgh.14409
Oka S, Tanaka S, Nakadoi K, Asayama N, Chayama K. Endoscopic features and management of diminutive colorectal submucosal invasive carcinoma. Dig. Endosc. 2014; 26: 78-83. https://doi.org/10.1111/den.12275
Sano Y, Tanaka S, Kudo SE et al. Narrow-band imaging (NBI) magnifying endoscopic classification of colorectal tumors proposed by the Japan NBI Expert Team. Dig. Endosc. 2016; 28: 526-533. https://doi.org/10.1111/den.12644
Murano T, Ikematsu H, Shinmura K et al. Endoscopic prediction of advanced histology in colorectal lesions sized <10 mm using the Japan Narrow-band imaging Expert Team classification. Dig. Endosc. 2020; 32: 785-790. https://doi.org/10.1111/den.13566
Schlemper RJ, Riddell RH, Kato Y et al. The Vienna classification of gastrointestinal epithelial neoplasia. Gut 2000; 47: 251-255. https://doi.org/10.1136/gut.47.2.251
Hashiguchi Y, Muro K, Saito Y et al. Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum (JSCCR) guidelines 2019 for the treatment of colorectal cancer. Int. J. Clin. Oncol. 2020; 25: 1-42. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10147-019-01485-z
Tappero G, Gaia E, De Giuli P, Martini S, Gubetta L, Emanuelli G. Cold snare excision of small colorectal polyps. Gastrointest. Endosc. 1992; 38: 310-313. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0016-5107(92)70422-2
Takeuchi Y, Mabe K, Shimodate Y et al. Continuous anticoagulation and cold snare polypectomy versus heparin bridging and hot snare polypectomy in patients on anticoagulants with subcentimeter polyps: a randomized controlled trial. Ann. Intern. Med. 2019; 171: 229-237. https://doi.org/10.7326/M19-0026
Horiuchi A, Nakayama Y, Kajiyama M, Tanaka N, Sano K, Graham DY. Removal of small colorectal polyps in anticoagulated patients: a prospective randomized comparison of cold snare and conventional polypectomy. Gastrointest. Endosc. 2014; 79: 417-423. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2013.08.040
Ito A, Suga T, Ota H, Tateiwa N, Matsumoto A, Tanaka E. Resection depth and layer of cold snare polypectomy versus endoscopic mucosal resection. J. Gastroenterol. 2018; 53: 1171-1178. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00535-018-1446-2
Suzuki S, Gotoda T, Kusano C et al. Width and depth of resection for small colorectal polyps: hot versus cold snare polypectomy. Gastrointest. Endosc. 2018; 87: 1095-1103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2017.10.041
Arimoto J, Chiba H, Higurashi T et al. Risk factors for incomplete polyp resection after cold snare polypectomy. Int. J. Colorectal Dis. 2019; 34: 1563-1569. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-019-03347-6
Murakami T, Yoshida N, Yasuda R et al. Local recurrence and its risk factors after cold snare polypectomy of colorectal polyps. Surg. Endosc. 2020; 34: 2918-2925. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-019-07072-7
Oka S, Tanaka S, Kanao H et al. Current status in the occurrence of postoperative bleeding, perforation and residual/local recurrence during colonoscopic treatment in Japan. Dig. Endosc. 2010; 22: 376-380. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1443-1661.2010.01016.x
Gupta N, Bansal A, Rao D et al. Prevalence of advanced histological features in diminutive and small colon polyps. Gastrointest. Endosc. 2012; 75: 1022-1030. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2012.01.020
Lieberman D, Moravec M, Holub J, Michaels L, Eisen G. Polyp size and advanced histology in patients undergoing colonoscopy screening: Implications for CT colonography. Gastroenterology 2008; 135: 1100-1105. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2008.06.083
Ferlitsch M, Moss A, Hassan C et al. Colorectal polypectomy and endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR): European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Clinical Guideline. Endoscopy 2017; 49: 270-297. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-102569
Yoshida N, Fukumoto K, Hasegawa D et al. Recurrence rate and lesions characteristics after cold snare polypectomy of high-grade dysplasia and T1 lesions: A multicenter analysis. J. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2021; 36: 3337-3344. https://doi.org/10.1111/jgh.15625