The sperm-interacting proteome in the bovine isthmus and ampulla during the periovulatory period.

Ampulla Fallopian tube Interactome Isthmus Oviduct Ovulation Post-ovulatory Pre-ovulatory Proteomics Spermatozoa

Journal

Journal of animal science and biotechnology
ISSN: 1674-9782
Titre abrégé: J Anim Sci Biotechnol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101581293

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
17 Feb 2023
Historique:
received: 15 07 2022
accepted: 24 11 2022
entrez: 17 2 2023
pubmed: 18 2 2023
medline: 18 2 2023
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Spermatozoa interact with oviduct secretions before fertilization in vivo but the molecular players of this dialog and underlying dynamics remain largely unknown. Our objectives were to identify an exhaustive list of sperm-interacting proteins (SIPs) in the bovine oviduct fluid and to evaluate the impact of the oviduct anatomical region (isthmus vs. ampulla) and time relative to ovulation (pre-ovulatory vs. post-ovulatory) on SIPs number and abundance. Pools of oviduct fluid (OF) from the pre-ovulatory ampulla, pre-ovulatory isthmus, post-ovulatory ampulla, and post-ovulatory isthmus in the side of ovulation were collected from the slaughterhouse. Frozen-thawed bull sperm were incubated with OF or phosphate-buffered saline (control) for 60 min at 38.5 °C. After protein extraction and digestion, sperm and OF samples were analyzed by nanoLC-MS/MS and label-free protein quantification. A quantitative comparison between proteins identified in sperm and OF samples (2333 and 2471 proteins, respectively) allowed for the identification of 245 SIPs. The highest number (187) were found in the pre-ovulatory isthmus, i.e., time and place of the sperm reservoir. In total, 41 SIPs (17%) were differentially abundant between stages in a given region or between regions at a given stage and 76 SIPs (31%) were identified in only one region × stage condition. Functional analysis of SIPs predicted roles in cell response to stress, regulation of cell motility, fertilization, and early embryo development. This study provides a comprehensive list of SIPs in the bovine oviduct and evidences dynamic spatio-temporal changes in sperm-oviduct interactions around ovulation time. Moreover, these data provide protein candidates to improve sperm conservation and in vitro fertilization media.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Spermatozoa interact with oviduct secretions before fertilization in vivo but the molecular players of this dialog and underlying dynamics remain largely unknown. Our objectives were to identify an exhaustive list of sperm-interacting proteins (SIPs) in the bovine oviduct fluid and to evaluate the impact of the oviduct anatomical region (isthmus vs. ampulla) and time relative to ovulation (pre-ovulatory vs. post-ovulatory) on SIPs number and abundance.
METHODS METHODS
Pools of oviduct fluid (OF) from the pre-ovulatory ampulla, pre-ovulatory isthmus, post-ovulatory ampulla, and post-ovulatory isthmus in the side of ovulation were collected from the slaughterhouse. Frozen-thawed bull sperm were incubated with OF or phosphate-buffered saline (control) for 60 min at 38.5 °C. After protein extraction and digestion, sperm and OF samples were analyzed by nanoLC-MS/MS and label-free protein quantification.
RESULTS RESULTS
A quantitative comparison between proteins identified in sperm and OF samples (2333 and 2471 proteins, respectively) allowed for the identification of 245 SIPs. The highest number (187) were found in the pre-ovulatory isthmus, i.e., time and place of the sperm reservoir. In total, 41 SIPs (17%) were differentially abundant between stages in a given region or between regions at a given stage and 76 SIPs (31%) were identified in only one region × stage condition. Functional analysis of SIPs predicted roles in cell response to stress, regulation of cell motility, fertilization, and early embryo development.
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
This study provides a comprehensive list of SIPs in the bovine oviduct and evidences dynamic spatio-temporal changes in sperm-oviduct interactions around ovulation time. Moreover, these data provide protein candidates to improve sperm conservation and in vitro fertilization media.

Identifiants

pubmed: 36797800
doi: 10.1186/s40104-022-00811-2
pii: 10.1186/s40104-022-00811-2
pmc: PMC9936689
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

30

Informations de copyright

© 2023. The Author(s).

Références

Cell. 1999 Jan 22;96(2):175-83
pubmed: 9988213
Biol Reprod. 1995 Nov;53(5):1066-74
pubmed: 8527509
Theriogenology. 2020 Oct 1;155:240-255
pubmed: 32791377
Theriogenology. 1999 Feb;51(3):583-95
pubmed: 10729044
Nat Commun. 2019 Apr 3;10(1):1523
pubmed: 30944313
Reprod Domest Anim. 2010 Apr;45(2):302-6
pubmed: 19019058
Antioxidants (Basel). 2018 Nov 24;7(12):
pubmed: 30477206
PLoS One. 2015 Apr 07;10(4):e0123003
pubmed: 25849110
Hum Reprod. 2017 Apr 1;32(4):733-742
pubmed: 28175305
Biol Reprod. 2013 Sep 27;89(3):67
pubmed: 23863406
Biol Reprod. 2007 Dec;77(6):906-13
pubmed: 17715429
Anal Chem. 2002 Oct 15;74(20):5383-92
pubmed: 12403597
Int J Mol Sci. 2019 Dec 28;21(1):
pubmed: 31905654
Hum Reprod. 2007 Oct;22(10):2606-14
pubmed: 17670764
Sci Rep. 2019 Jul 1;9(1):9484
pubmed: 31263184
Nucleic Acids Res. 2015 Jan;43(Database issue):D447-52
pubmed: 25352553
BMC Bioinformatics. 2014 Aug 29;15:293
pubmed: 25176396
Hum Reprod. 2018 Aug 1;33(8):1394-1407
pubmed: 29912414
Mol Hum Reprod. 2006 Apr;12(4):275-82
pubmed: 16567366
Theriogenology. 2019 Jan 15;124:48-56
pubmed: 30343199
Reproduction. 2016 Dec;152(6):629-644
pubmed: 27601716
Int J Mol Sci. 2021 Jul 23;22(15):
pubmed: 34360666
Anal Biochem. 2010 Jun 15;401(2):318-20
pubmed: 20206115
Mol Reprod Dev. 1992 Nov;33(3):313-23
pubmed: 1449798
Nat Biotechnol. 2022 Jul;40(7):1023-1025
pubmed: 34980915
J Exp Zool. 1983 Oct;228(1):121-8
pubmed: 6663251
Biol Reprod. 2004 Dec;71(6):1879-89
pubmed: 15286042
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008 Oct 14;105(41):15809-14
pubmed: 18838686
Reproduction. 2017 Sep;154(3):153-168
pubmed: 28630101
Anim Reprod Sci. 2005 Nov;90(1-2):73-84
pubmed: 15950408
Sci Rep. 2019 Dec 19;9(1):19448
pubmed: 31857603
Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2009 Nov;10(11):778-90
pubmed: 19851336
Reproduction. 2020 Apr;159(4):371-382
pubmed: 31990667
Annu Rev Anim Biosci. 2016;4:291-310
pubmed: 26526545
J Proteomics. 2020 Aug 15;225:103884
pubmed: 32593762
Genome Res. 2003 Nov;13(11):2498-504
pubmed: 14597658
Mol Hum Reprod. 2017 Feb 10;23(2):106-115
pubmed: 28025393
Cells. 2020 Jun 12;9(6):
pubmed: 32545517
Anim Reprod Sci. 2006 Jul;93(3-4):246-57
pubmed: 16198514
Mol Hum Reprod. 2011 Aug;17(8):524-38
pubmed: 21586547
Dev Biol. 2021 Feb;470:49-61
pubmed: 33188738
Hum Reprod. 2010 Jun;25(6):1504-12
pubmed: 20338958
J Exp Med. 2007 Oct 1;204(10):2285-91
pubmed: 17875677
Cancer Res. 2006 May 15;66(10):5173-80
pubmed: 16707441
Biol Reprod. 1994 Jul;51(1):34-42
pubmed: 7918873
J Cell Sci. 2008 Jan 1;121(Pt 1):11-8
pubmed: 18096687
Cell Tissue Res. 2016 Jan;363(1):105-127
pubmed: 26386584
J Dairy Sci. 1980 Jan;63(1):155-60
pubmed: 7372895
Fertil Steril. 2011 Mar 15;95(4):1475-7.e1-4
pubmed: 21208614
Theriogenology. 2020 Jul 1;150:59-69
pubmed: 32088033
Reproduction. 2012 Dec;144(6):649-60
pubmed: 23028122
Theriogenology. 2020 Nov;157:490-497
pubmed: 32898824
Reprod Fertil Dev. 2009;21(4):525-37
pubmed: 19383259
Reproduction. 2018 May;155(5):457-466
pubmed: 29540510
Redox Biol. 2022 Feb;49:102212
pubmed: 34923300
Anal Chem. 2003 Sep 1;75(17):4646-58
pubmed: 14632076
Biology (Basel). 2021 Nov 09;10(11):
pubmed: 34827147
Mol Reprod Dev. 2015 Sep;82(9):635-50
pubmed: 26061344
Mol Biol Cell. 2004 Feb;15(2):688-95
pubmed: 14617807
J Cell Biochem. 2020 Apr;121(4):2877-2888
pubmed: 31692037
J Assist Reprod Genet. 2019 Jul;36(7):1363-1377
pubmed: 31254143
Reproduction. 2016 Nov;152(5):561-573
pubmed: 27581080
Reprod Nutr Dev (1980). 1984;24(5A):597-608
pubmed: 6549076
Sci Rep. 2022 Mar 9;12(1):4135
pubmed: 35264682
FASEB J. 2021 Dec;35(12):e22000
pubmed: 34731497
J Assist Reprod Genet. 2022 Oct;39(10):2287-2301
pubmed: 35972586
Fertil Steril. 2010 Mar 15;93(5):1574-84
pubmed: 19296942
J Biol Chem. 2015 Jul 17;290(29):17710-17723
pubmed: 26023236
Anim Reprod Sci. 1998 Dec 1;54(1):1-12
pubmed: 9877060
J Anim Sci Biotechnol. 2017 Sep 1;8:69
pubmed: 28883914
Biol Reprod. 1991 Jun;44(6):998-1004
pubmed: 1873399
Reproduction. 2009 Feb;137(2):191-203
pubmed: 18996976
Int J Mol Sci. 2020 Aug 22;21(17):
pubmed: 32842715
J Reprod Fertil. 1995 Sep;105(1):57-64
pubmed: 7490715
J Biol Chem. 2016 Nov 25;291(48):24828-24837
pubmed: 27697842

Auteurs

Coline Mahé (C)

CNRS, IFCE, INRAE, Université de Tours, PRC, 37380, Nouzilly, France. coline.mahe@inrae.fr.

Régis Lavigne (R)

Univ Rennes, Inserm, EHESP, Irset (Institut de Recherche en Santé, Environnement Et Travail) - UMR-S 1085, F-35000, Rennes, France.
Univ Rennes, CNRS, Inserm, Biosit UAR 3480 US_S 018, Protim Core Facility, 35000, Rennes, France.

Emmanuelle Com (E)

Univ Rennes, Inserm, EHESP, Irset (Institut de Recherche en Santé, Environnement Et Travail) - UMR-S 1085, F-35000, Rennes, France.
Univ Rennes, CNRS, Inserm, Biosit UAR 3480 US_S 018, Protim Core Facility, 35000, Rennes, France.

Charles Pineau (C)

Univ Rennes, Inserm, EHESP, Irset (Institut de Recherche en Santé, Environnement Et Travail) - UMR-S 1085, F-35000, Rennes, France.
Univ Rennes, CNRS, Inserm, Biosit UAR 3480 US_S 018, Protim Core Facility, 35000, Rennes, France.

Aleksandra Maria Zlotkowska (AM)

Institute of Reproductive Biology, Leibniz Institute for Farm Animal Biology, FBN, Dummerstorf, Germany.
Department of Reproduction Biology, Leibniz Institute for Zoo and Wildlife Research (IZW), Berlin, Germany.

Guillaume Tsikis (G)

CNRS, IFCE, INRAE, Université de Tours, PRC, 37380, Nouzilly, France.

Pascal Mermillod (P)

CNRS, IFCE, INRAE, Université de Tours, PRC, 37380, Nouzilly, France.

Jennifer Schoen (J)

Institute of Reproductive Biology, Leibniz Institute for Farm Animal Biology, FBN, Dummerstorf, Germany.
Department of Reproduction Biology, Leibniz Institute for Zoo and Wildlife Research (IZW), Berlin, Germany.

Marie Saint-Dizier (M)

CNRS, IFCE, INRAE, Université de Tours, PRC, 37380, Nouzilly, France.

Classifications MeSH