Sick leave after arthroscopic meniscus repair vs. arthroscopic partial meniscectomy.
Arthroscopy
Meniscus
Meniscus repair
Partial meniscectomy
Sick leave
Journal
Osteoarthritis and cartilage open
ISSN: 2665-9131
Titre abrégé: Osteoarthr Cartil Open
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101767068
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Mar 2023
Mar 2023
Historique:
received:
02
11
2022
revised:
10
01
2023
accepted:
17
01
2023
entrez:
17
2
2023
pubmed:
18
2
2023
medline:
18
2
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
To evaluate sick leave after meniscal repair vs arthroscopic partial meniscectomy (APM) and, for comparison, vs the general population. Using Swedish register data we included all employed persons aged 19-49 years in the general population of Skåne region and identified those having had meniscus repair or APM in the period of 2005-2012. We retrieved data on sick leave during 1 year before until 2 years after surgery. We used logistic regression to estimate the risk differences of being on sick leave and negative binomial model to analyze differences in the number of days on sick leave. We included 192 persons with meniscus repair, 2481 with APM, and 376 345 references without meniscus surgery. Of these, 55% of meniscus repair group, 43% of APM group had any sick leave in the 2-year period following the surgery, while 17% of the references were on sick leave in the corresponding period. The mean (SD) number of days of sick leave after meniscus repair was 55 (77) days and for APM 37 (86) days. Meniscus repair was associated with higher probability of sick leave compared to APM with an adjusted risk difference of 0.13 (95% CI 0.07-0.19). Persons undergoing meniscus repair have more frequent and 37% longer periods of sick leave in the short term than persons undergoing APM. However, sick leave in the long-term warrant further attention as successful repair may be associated with less knee osteoarthritis development than APM.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36798736
doi: 10.1016/j.ocarto.2023.100340
pii: S2665-9131(23)00007-9
pmc: PMC9926294
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
100340Informations de copyright
© 2023 The Authors.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
No conflict of interests for any of the authors.
Références
Acta Orthop Scand. 2000 Oct;71(5):455-60
pubmed: 11186400
Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2018 Feb;26(2):184-194
pubmed: 28903016
Arthroscopy. 2011 Sep;27(9):1275-88
pubmed: 21820843
Br J Sports Med. 2016 May;50(9):558-63
pubmed: 26935859
Br J Sports Med. 2020 Mar;54(5):286-291
pubmed: 30661013
Osteoarthr Cartil Open. 2020 Feb 14;2(2):100040
pubmed: 36474582
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2016 Jun;24(6):1997-2001
pubmed: 25261222
Arthroscopy. 2012 Dec;28(12):1812-8
pubmed: 23089349
Am J Sports Med. 2013 Oct;41(10):2333-9
pubmed: 23863849
Arthroscopy. 2018 Sep;34(9):2614-2620
pubmed: 30173802
J Trauma. 1991 Dec;31(12):1644-8
pubmed: 1749037
BMC Public Health. 2011 Jun 09;11:450
pubmed: 21658213
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2019 Jun;105(4):677-682
pubmed: 31027979
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2019 Jan;27(1):215-222
pubmed: 30539307
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2020 Jul;28(7):2044-2052
pubmed: 30762087
BMJ Open. 2017 Aug 21;7(8):e017436
pubmed: 28827270
Am J Sports Med. 2022 Jul;50(8):2075-2082
pubmed: 35604336
Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2018 Feb;26(2):195-201
pubmed: 29146386
Am J Sports Med. 2009 Jun;37(6):1131-4
pubmed: 19279222
Knee. 2016 Aug;23(4):674-80
pubmed: 27157145
Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2006 Jun;85(6):490-501
pubmed: 16715018
J Clin Epidemiol. 2012 Feb;65(2):212-8
pubmed: 21852072
Arthritis Rheumatol. 2022 Aug;74(8):1333-1342
pubmed: 35245416