The interplay between ovarian cancer and social relationships: an analysis of patients' metaphors.

Australia Italy Ovarian cancer metaphor patient social relationships

Journal

Psychology & health
ISSN: 1476-8321
Titre abrégé: Psychol Health
Pays: England
ID NLM: 8807983

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
21 Feb 2023
Historique:
entrez: 21 2 2023
pubmed: 22 2 2023
medline: 22 2 2023
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Research showed that ovarian cancer poses unique challenges to patients' care experiences and that patients' social networks could affect their care path significantly. The present study aimed to analyse the metaphors that patients used to signify the impact of the illness on their social relationships and the role of relationships in dealing with cancer. Following a qualitative description approach we conducted 38 semi-structured interviews with Australian (14) and Italian (24) women diagnosed at different stages of ovarian cancer. The analysis identified four themes bringing together the meanings expressed by participants' metaphors: Lack of comprehension and communication; Isolation, marginalisation, and self-isolation; Discrepancy between the private and public self; and Social relationships as empowerment resources. The polysemic nature of patients' metaphors captures both the empowering and especially disempowering role of social relationships in dealing with ovarian cancer. Results also show that metaphors are used to make sense of the impact of ovarian cancer on social relationships and to express different strategies for managing patients' networks.

Identifiants

pubmed: 36803125
doi: 10.1080/08870446.2023.2180149
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

1-20

Auteurs

Lorenzo Montali (L)

Department of Psychology, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy.

Joanne Brooker (J)

Cairnmillar Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Szalmuk Family Psycho-Oncology Unit, Cabrini Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

Elisabetta Camussi (E)

Department of Psychology, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy.

Parris Davenport (P)

Deakin University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

Elisabetta Ronco (E)

Department of Psychology, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy.

Lyndel Shand (L)

Deakin University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

Edoardo Zulato (E)

Department of Psychology, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy.

Tess Knight (T)

Cairnmillar Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Deakin University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

Classifications MeSH