Implementing a discharge process for patients undergoing elective surgery: Rapid review.

Barriers Discharge Elective surgery Facilitators Implementation Nursing Technology

Journal

International journal of orthopaedic and trauma nursing
ISSN: 1878-1292
Titre abrégé: Int J Orthop Trauma Nurs
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101528681

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Feb 2023
Historique:
received: 01 10 2022
revised: 14 01 2023
accepted: 04 02 2023
pubmed: 23 2 2023
medline: 21 3 2023
entrez: 22 2 2023
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Hospital discharge is a 'vulnerable stage' in care. A delayed, inappropriate or poorly planned discharge increases hazards and costs, inhibiting recovery, and often leading to unplanned readmission. New discharge processes could boost practice, reduce the length of stay, and, consequently, reduce costs and improve patients' quality of life. To identify technology based interventions that have been implemented to facilitate a safe and timely discharge procedure after elective surgery, and to describe implementation barriers and facilitators and patient satisfaction. This rapid review followed a restricted systematic review framework, searching Medline, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsychINFO, and ClinicalTrials.gov. for relevant studies published from 2015 to 2021 in English. Eleven studies were included. Most interventions were machine-learning-based, and only one study reported patient involvement. Effective leadership, team work and communication were stated as implementation facilitators. The main barriers to implementation were: lack of support from leaders, poor clinical documentation, resistance to change, and financial and logistical concerns. None of the studies evaluated patient satisfaction. Findings highlight factors that support the implementation of technology based interventions aimed at a safe and timely discharge process following elective surgery. Nurses play an important role in the provision of information, and in the development and implementation of discharge processes.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Hospital discharge is a 'vulnerable stage' in care. A delayed, inappropriate or poorly planned discharge increases hazards and costs, inhibiting recovery, and often leading to unplanned readmission. New discharge processes could boost practice, reduce the length of stay, and, consequently, reduce costs and improve patients' quality of life.
AIM OBJECTIVE
To identify technology based interventions that have been implemented to facilitate a safe and timely discharge procedure after elective surgery, and to describe implementation barriers and facilitators and patient satisfaction.
METHOD METHODS
This rapid review followed a restricted systematic review framework, searching Medline, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsychINFO, and ClinicalTrials.gov. for relevant studies published from 2015 to 2021 in English.
RESULTS RESULTS
Eleven studies were included. Most interventions were machine-learning-based, and only one study reported patient involvement. Effective leadership, team work and communication were stated as implementation facilitators. The main barriers to implementation were: lack of support from leaders, poor clinical documentation, resistance to change, and financial and logistical concerns. None of the studies evaluated patient satisfaction.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
Findings highlight factors that support the implementation of technology based interventions aimed at a safe and timely discharge process following elective surgery. Nurses play an important role in the provision of information, and in the development and implementation of discharge processes.

Identifiants

pubmed: 36805314
pii: S1878-1241(23)00005-9
doi: 10.1016/j.ijotn.2023.101001
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Review

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

101001

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2023. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest for this article.

Auteurs

Maria J C Teixeira (MJC)

Nursing Research Department, Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital NHS Trust, London, UK; London South Bank University, London, UK; Nuffield Health, The Manor Hospital, Oxford, UK. Electronic address: jo.teixeira1@nhs.net.

Ma'ali Khouri (M)

Institute of Orthopaedics Library, University College London, London, UK.

Evangeline Martinez (E)

Functional and Restorative Services, London Spinal Cord Injury Research Centre, Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital NHS Trust, London, UK; University College London, London, UK.

Suzanne Bench (S)

London South Bank University, London, UK; ACORN A Centre of Research for Nurses & Midwives, Guys and St Thomas's NHS Trust, Lond, UK.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH