Progesterone for women with threatened miscarriage (STOP trial): a placebo-controlled randomized clinical trial.
early pregnancy
live birth
miscarriage prevention
progesterone
threatened miscarriage
Journal
Human reproduction (Oxford, England)
ISSN: 1460-2350
Titre abrégé: Hum Reprod
Pays: England
ID NLM: 8701199
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
03 04 2023
03 04 2023
Historique:
received:
17
07
2022
revised:
15
01
2023
medline:
4
4
2023
pubmed:
23
2
2023
entrez:
22
2
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
In women with threatened miscarriage, does progesterone supplementation until the completion of the first trimester of pregnancy increase the probability of live birth? In women with threatened miscarriage, 400 mg vaginal progesterone nightly, from onset of bleeding until 12 weeks, did not increase live birth rates. Limited evidence has indicated that vaginal micronized progesterone may make little or no difference to the live birth rate when compared with placebo in women with threatened miscarriage. Subgroup analysis of one recent randomized trial reported that in women with bleeding and at least one previous miscarriage, progesterone might be of benefit. We performed a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial between February 2012 and April 2019. Eligible pregnant women under 10 weeks gestation, experiencing a threatened miscarriage as apparent from vaginal bleeding were randomized into two groups in a 1:1 ratio: the intervention group received 400 mg progesterone as vaginal pessaries, the control group received placebo vaginal pessaries, both until 12 weeks gestation. The primary endpoint was live birth. We planned to randomize 386 women (193 per group). The study was stopped at a planned interim analysis for futility after randomization of 278 women. This trial was conducted at the Mater Mothers' Hospital, a tertiary centre for maternity care in South Brisbane, Queensland, Australia. We randomized 139 women to the intervention group and 139 women to the placebo group. Primary outcome data were available for 136 women in the intervention group and 133 women in the placebo group. The live birth rates were 82.4% (112/136) and 84.2% (112/133) in the intervention group and placebo group, respectively (risk ratio (RR) 0.98, 95% CI 0.88 to 1.09; risk difference -0.02, 95% CI -0.11 to 0.07; P = 0.683). Among women with at least one previous miscarriage, live birth rates were 80.6% (54/67) and 84.4% (65/77) (RR 0.95, 95% CI 0.82-1.11; P = 0.550). No significant effect was seen from progesterone in women with two (RR 1.28, 95% CI 0.96-1.72; P = 0.096) or more (RR 0.79, 95% CI 0.53-1.19; P = 0.267) previous miscarriages. Preterm birth rates were 12.9% and 9.3%, respectively (RR 1.38; 95% CI 0.69 to 2.78; P = 0.361). Median birth weight was 3310 vs 3300 g (P = 0.992). There were also no other significant differences in obstetric and perinatal outcomes. Our study was single centre and did not reach the planned sample size because it was stopped prematurely at an interim analysis. We did not find evidence supporting the treatment effect of vaginal progesterone in women with threatened miscarriage. Progesterone in this setting should not be routinely used for threatened miscarriage. The treatment effect in women with threatened miscarriage after previous miscarriages warrants further research. Mothers' and babies Golden Casket Clinical Fellowship (L.A.M.). Progesterone and placebo pessaries were provided by Perrigo Australia.B.W.J.M. reports grants from NHMRC, personal fees from ObsEva, personal fees from Merck KGaA, personal fees from Guerbet, personal fees from iGenomix, outside the submitted work. ACTRN12611000405910. 19 April 2011. 06 February 2012.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36806843
pii: 7048705
doi: 10.1093/humrep/dead029
pmc: PMC10069850
doi:
Substances chimiques
Progesterone
4G7DS2Q64Y
Banques de données
ANZCTR
['ACTRN12611000405910']
Types de publication
Randomized Controlled Trial
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
560-568Informations de copyright
© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.
Références
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Oct 08;10:CD003511
pubmed: 30298541
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2015 Oct;55(5):e1-29
pubmed: 26412014
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2011 Mar;283(3):431-5
pubmed: 20107822
Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2010 Dec;22(6):452-7
pubmed: 20930630
Obstet Gynecol. 2009 Oct;114(4):860-867
pubmed: 19888046
N Engl J Med. 2019 May 9;380(19):1815-1824
pubmed: 31067371
Maturitas. 2009 Dec;65 Suppl 1:S47-50
pubmed: 20005647
BJOG. 2010 Feb;117(3):245-57
pubmed: 19943827
J Obstet Gynaecol. 2010;30(6):622-5
pubmed: 20701515
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Apr 19;4:CD013792
pubmed: 33872382
Gynecol Endocrinol. 2007 Apr;23(4):222-5
pubmed: 17505942
Reprod Biomed Online. 2008 Jul;17(1):101-13
pubmed: 18616898
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2005 Oct;159(10):957-62
pubmed: 16203941
Behav Res Ther. 1995 Mar;33(3):335-43
pubmed: 7726811
Br J Gen Pract. 1992 Mar;42(356):94-6
pubmed: 1493042
Maturitas. 2009 Dec;65 Suppl 1:S43-6
pubmed: 20007011
Biol Res Pregnancy Perinatol. 1987;8(1 1ST Half):26-34
pubmed: 2437967
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2018 Feb;31(3):388-394
pubmed: 28114846
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2004 Dec;1034:200-10
pubmed: 15731312
Hum Reprod. 2021 Feb 18;36(3):587-595
pubmed: 33331637
Lancet. 2021 Aug 28;398(10302):743-744
pubmed: 34454666
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 May 2;5:CD012852
pubmed: 32358837