Evaluation of Concomitant Systemic Treatment in Older Adults With Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma Undergoing Definitive Radiotherapy.
Journal
JAMA network open
ISSN: 2574-3805
Titre abrégé: JAMA Netw Open
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101729235
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 02 2023
01 02 2023
Historique:
entrez:
22
2
2023
pubmed:
23
2
2023
medline:
25
2
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The number of older adults with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) is increasing, and these patients are underrepresented in clinical trials. It is unclear whether the addition of chemotherapy or cetuximab to radiotherapy is associated with improved survival in older adults with HNSCC. To examine whether the addition of chemotherapy or cetuximab to definitive radiotherapy is associated with improved survival in patients with locoregionally advanced (LA) HNSCC. The Special Care Patterns for Elderly HNSCC Patients Undergoing Radiotherapy (SENIOR) study is an international, multicenter cohort study including older adults (≥65 years) with LA-HNSCCs of the oral cavity, oropharynx/hypopharynx, or larynx treated with definitive radiotherapy, either alone or with concomitant systemic treatment, between January 2005 and December 2019 at 12 academic centers in the US and Europe. Data analysis was conducted from June 4 to August 10, 2022. All patients underwent definitive radiotherapy alone or with concomitant systemic treatment. The primary outcome was overall survival. Secondary outcomes included progression-free survival and locoregional failure rate. Among the 1044 patients (734 men [70.3%]; median [IQR] age, 73 [69-78] years) included in this study, 234 patients (22.4%) were treated with radiotherapy alone and 810 patients (77.6%) received concomitant systemic treatment with chemotherapy (677 [64.8%]) or cetuximab (133 [12.7%]). Using inverse probability weighting to attribute for selection bias, chemoradiation was associated with longer overall survival than radiotherapy alone (hazard ratio [HR], 0.61; 95% CI, 0.48-0.77; P < .001), whereas cetuximab-based bioradiotherapy was not (HR, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.70-1.27; P = .70). Progression-free survival was also longer after the addition of chemotherapy (HR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.52-0.81; P < .001), while the locoregional failure rate was not significantly different (subhazard ratio, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.30-1.26; P = .19). The survival benefit of the chemoradiation group was present in patients up to age 80 years (65-69 years: HR, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.33-0.82; 70-79 years: HR, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.43-0.85), but was absent in patients aged 80 years or older (HR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.56-1.41). In this cohort study of older adults with LA- HNSCC, chemoradiation, but not cetuximab-based bioradiotherapy, was associated with longer survival compared with radiotherapy alone.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36808242
pii: 2801648
doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.0090
pmc: PMC9941890
doi:
Substances chimiques
Cetuximab
PQX0D8J21J
Types de publication
Multicenter Study
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e230090Références
Support Care Cancer. 2021 Aug;29(8):4473-4483
pubmed: 33454834
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2022 Jul;279(7):3657-3664
pubmed: 34905065
Lancet Oncol. 2012 Feb;13(2):145-53
pubmed: 22261362
Oncologist. 2017 Sep;22(9):1056-1066
pubmed: 28533474
Radiother Oncol. 2021 Mar;156:281-293
pubmed: 33515668
Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2014 Aug;91(2):142-58
pubmed: 24636481
BMC Cancer. 2020 Aug 27;20(1):813
pubmed: 32854649
Head Neck. 2017 Jun;39(6):1113-1121
pubmed: 28301079
Radiother Oncol. 2009 Dec;93(3):516-23
pubmed: 19699545
J Clin Oncol. 2009 Jun 10;27(17):2758-65
pubmed: 19403886
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2014 May 1;89(1):30-7
pubmed: 24725687
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2021 Nov 15;111(4):876-886
pubmed: 34098030
Oncologist. 2013;18(5):568-78
pubmed: 23635557
Oral Oncol. 2018 Nov;86:132-140
pubmed: 30409293
Radiat Oncol. 2020 Feb 4;15(1):31
pubmed: 32019576
Cancers (Basel). 2022 Jun 05;14(11):
pubmed: 35681789
Cancers (Basel). 2020 Jan 21;12(2):
pubmed: 31973016
Lancet. 2019 Jan 5;393(10166):40-50
pubmed: 30449625
Lancet Oncol. 2010 Jan;11(1):21-8
pubmed: 19897418
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2013 Dec 07;13:152
pubmed: 24314264
Cancer. 2018 Jul 15;124(14):2993-2999
pubmed: 29710393
Cancers (Basel). 2022 Jan 18;14(3):
pubmed: 35158740
J Clin Oncol. 2013 Mar 1;31(7):845-52
pubmed: 23182993
Am J Otolaryngol. 2013 Nov-Dec;34(6):631-5
pubmed: 23954137
Front Oncol. 2022 Jan 03;11:723716
pubmed: 35047384
Cancer. 2016 May 15;122(10):1533-43
pubmed: 26969811
JAMA Oncol. 2021 Nov 01;7(11):e214158
pubmed: 34591080
J Chronic Dis. 1987;40(5):373-83
pubmed: 3558716
J Clin Oncol. 2015 Oct 10;33(29):3314-21
pubmed: 26351334
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2000 Apr 1;47(1):49-56
pubmed: 10758304
Lancet Oncol. 2011 Feb;12(2):127-36
pubmed: 21236730
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2015 Apr 1;91(5):916-24
pubmed: 25670541
J Clin Oncol. 2022 Jun 20;40(18):1980-1990
pubmed: 35230884
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2011 Jan 1;79(1):46-51
pubmed: 20395066
Value Health. 2010 Mar-Apr;13(2):273-7
pubmed: 19912596
Oral Oncol. 2015 May;51(5):521-8
pubmed: 25797461
Radiother Oncol. 2021 Jan;154:276-282
pubmed: 33245947
Lancet. 2019 Jan 5;393(10166):51-60
pubmed: 30449623
Cancer. 2008 Dec 1;113(11):3160-8
pubmed: 18932260
Ann Oncol. 2020 Nov;31(11):1462-1475
pubmed: 33239190
Oral Oncol. 2019 Dec;99:104472
pubmed: 31704556
Ann Oncol. 2007 Jul;18(7):1224-9
pubmed: 17675395
CA Cancer J Clin. 2018 Nov;68(6):394-424
pubmed: 30207593
Oral Oncol. 2020 Aug 31;109:104687
pubmed: 32882642
Cancers (Basel). 2022 Jul 05;14(13):
pubmed: 35805060
J Clin Psychiatry. 2020 Sep 22;81(5):
pubmed: 32965803
Radiother Oncol. 2009 Jul;92(1):4-14
pubmed: 19446902
PLoS One. 2011 Mar 31;6(3):e18174
pubmed: 21483818