Italian translation and validation of the CGM satisfaction scale questionnaire.

Humans Adolescent Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1 / psychology Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring / psychology Blood Glucose Reproducibility of Results Surveys and Questionnaires Italy Personal Satisfaction

Adolescents CGM-SAT Children Questionnaire Type 1 diabetes Validation

Journal

Acta diabetologica

ISSN: 1432-5233

Titre abrégé: Acta Diabetol

Pays: Germany

ID NLM: 9200299

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
May 2023

Historique:

received: 03 01 2023

accepted: 27 01 2023

medline: 3 4 2023

pubmed: 23 2 2023

entrez: 22 2 2023

Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) are increasingly important for assessing patient satisfaction with diabetes technologies. PROs must be assessed with validated questionnaires in clinical practice and research studies. Our aim was to translate and validate the Italian version of the continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) Satisfaction (CGM-SAT) scale questionnaire. Questionnaire validation followed MAPI Research Trust guidelines and included forward translation, reconciliation, backward translation, and cognitive debriefing. The final version of the questionnaire was administered to 210 patients with type 1 diabetes (T1D) and 232 parents. The completion rate was excellent, with almost 100% of items answered. The overall Cronbach's coefficient was 0.71 and 0.85 for young people (patients) and parents indicating moderate and good internal consistency, respectively. Parent-young people agreement was 0.404 (95% confidence interval: 0.391-0.417), indicating moderate agreement between the two assessments. Factor analysis identified that factors assessing the "benefits" and "hassles" of CGM accounted for 33.9% and 12.9% of score variance in young people and 29.6% and 19.8% in parents, respectively. We present the successful Italian translation and validation of the CGM-SAT scale questionnaire, which will be useful for assessing satisfaction with Italian T1D patients using CGM systems.

Identifiants

DOI: 10.1007/s00592-023-02043-w PMID: 36808474

pubmed: 36808474

doi: 10.1007/s00592-023-02043-w

pii: 10.1007/s00592-023-02043-w

doi:

Substances chimiques

Blood Glucose 0

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

Pagination

673-679

Informations de copyright

Références

@@@ Sacristan JA (2013) Patient-centered medicine and patient-oriented research: improving health outcomes for individual patients. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 13:6. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6947-13-16

doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-13-16 pubmed: 23294526 pmcid: 3575265

@@@ Saisho Y (2018) Use of diabetes treatment satisfaction questionnaire in diabetes care: importance of patient-reported outcomes. Int J Environ Res Public Health 15(5):947. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15050947

doi: 10.3390/ijerph15050947 pubmed: 29747423 pmcid: 5981986

@@@Pettus JH, Kushner JA, Valentine V et al (2019) Adjunct therapy in type 1 diabetes: a survey to uncover unmet needs and patient preferences beyond HbA1c measures. Diabetes Technol Ther 21(6):336–343. https://doi.org/10.1089/dia.2019.0027

doi: 10.1089/dia.2019.0027 pubmed: 31095422 pmcid: 6551969

@@@ https://www.eunethta.eu/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/OTJA08_CGM-real-time-and-FGM-aspersonal2c-standalone-systems-in-patients-with-diabetes-mellitus-treatedwith-insulin.pdf

@@@Franceschi R, Micheli F, Mozzillo E et al (2021) Intermittently scanned and continuous glucose monitor systems: a systematic review on psychological outcomes in pediatric patients. Front Pediatr 9:6601763. https://doi.org/10.3389/fped.2021.660173

doi: 10.3389/fped.2021.660173

@@@Diabetes Research in Children Network (DirecNet) Study G (2005) Youth and parent satisfaction with clinical use of the GlucoWatch G2 Biographer in the management of pediatric type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Care 28(8):1929–1935

@@@Tansey M, Laffel L, Cheng J et al (2011) Satisfaction with continuous glucose monitoring in adults and youths with type 1 diabetes. Diabet Med 28:1118–1122. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-5491.2011.03368.x

@@@Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation Continuous Glucose Monitoring Study Group (2010) Validation of measures of satisfaction with and impact of continuous and conventional glucose monitoring. Diabetes Technol Ther 12(9):679–684. https://doi.org/10.1089/dia.2010.0015

@@@Farfel A, Liberman A, Yackobovitch-Gavan M, Phillip M, Nimri R (2020) Executive functions and adherence to continuous glucose monitoring in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Technol Ther 22(4):265–270. https://doi.org/10.1089/dia.2019.0341

doi: 10.1089/dia.2019.0341 pubmed: 31789577

@@@Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation Continuous Glucose Monitoring Study Group, Beck RW, Lawrence JM et al (2010) Quality-of-life measures in children and adults with type 1 diabetes: Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation Continuous Glucose Monitoring randomized trial. Diabetes Care 33(10):2175–2177. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc10-0331

@@@Beck RW, Riddlesworth T, Ruedy K et al (2017) Effect of continuous glucose monitoring on glycemic control in adults with type 1 diabetes using insulin injections: the DIAMOND randomized clinical trial. JAMA 317:371–378. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2016.19975

@@@Ruedy KJ, Parkin CG, Riddlesworth TD, Graham C, DIAMOND Study Group (2017) Continuous glucose monitoring in older adults with type 1 and type 2 diabetes using multiple daily injections of insulin: results from the DIAMOND trial. J Diabetes Sci Technol 11(6):1138–1146. https://doi.org/10.1177/1932296817704445

@@@Schober P, Boer C, Schwarte LA (2018) Correlation coefficients: appropriate use and interpretation. Anesth Analg 126(5):1763–1768. https://doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0000000000002864

doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000002864 pubmed: 29481436

@@@Tsalikian E, Fox L, Weinzimer S et al (2012) Feasibility of prolonged continuous glucose monitoring in toddlers with type 1 diabetes. Pediatr Diabetes 13(4):301–307. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-5448.2011.00837.x

@@@Diabetes Research in Children Network (DirecNet) Study Group (2006) Psychological aspects of continuous glucose monitoring in pediatric type 1 diabetes. Pediatr Diabetes 7(1):32–38. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-543X.2006.00142.x

@@@Rasbach LE, Volkening LK, Markowitz JT, Butler DA, Katz ML, Laffel LM (2015) Youth and parent measures of self-efficacy for continuous glucose monitoring: survey psychometric properties. Diabetes Technol Ther 17(5):327–334. https://doi.org/10.1089/dia.2014.0366

doi: 10.1089/dia.2014.0366 pubmed: 25695341 pmcid: 4397990