Analytical Performance and Potential Clinical Utility of EUCAST Rapid Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing in Blood Cultures after Four Hours of Incubation.
ESBL
antibiotic resistance
blood culture
bloodstream infection
rapid tests
susceptibility testing
Journal
Microbiology spectrum
ISSN: 2165-0497
Titre abrégé: Microbiol Spectr
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101634614
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
21 Feb 2023
21 Feb 2023
Historique:
entrez:
22
2
2023
pubmed:
23
2
2023
medline:
23
2
2023
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
EUCAST rapid antimicrobial susceptibility testing (RAST) provides antibiotic susceptibility results after 4 to 8 h of incubation. This study assessed the diagnostic performance and clinical usefulness of EUCAST RAST after 4 h. This was a retrospective clinical study performed on blood cultures with Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae complex (K. pneumoniae and Klebsiella variicola) at Karolinska University Laboratory (Stockholm, Sweden). The rate of categorized RAST results and the categorical agreement (CA) of RAST with the standard EUCAST 16-to-20-h disk diffusion (DD) method for piperacillin-tazobactam, cefotaxime, ceftazidime, meropenem, and ciprofloxacin were analyzed, as well as the utility of RAST for adjusting the empirical antibiotic therapy (EAT) and the combination of RAST with a lateral flow assay (LFA) for extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL) detection. A total of 530 E. coli and 112 K. pneumoniae complex strains were analyzed, generating 2,641 and 558 readable RAST zones, respectively. RAST results categorized according to antimicrobial sensitivity/resistance (S/R) were obtained for 83.1% (2,194/2,641) and 87.5% (488/558) of E. coli and K. pneumoniae complex strains, respectively. The RAST result categorization to S/R for piperacillin-tazobactam was poor (37.2% for
Identifiants
pubmed: 36809027
doi: 10.1128/spectrum.05001-22
pmc: PMC10100889
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e0500122Références
JAMA. 2016 Feb 23;315(8):801-10
pubmed: 26903338
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2008 Jan;14 Suppl 1:90-103
pubmed: 18154532
J Med Microbiol. 2015 Nov;64(11):1346-1352
pubmed: 26361761
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2018 Dec;24(12):1264-1272
pubmed: 29581049
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2021 Jan 1;76(1):233-238
pubmed: 33305799
Crit Care Med. 2021 Nov 1;49(11):e1063-e1143
pubmed: 34605781
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2020 May;39(5):993-998
pubmed: 31955354
J Glob Antimicrob Resist. 2020 Sep;22:637-642
pubmed: 32512237
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2021 Mar 12;76(4):1110-1112
pubmed: 33411918
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2020 Jul;39(7):1305-1313
pubmed: 32112163
Antibiotics (Basel). 2022 Oct 13;11(10):
pubmed: 36290062
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2017 Apr 1;72(4):1094-1102
pubmed: 27999046
Chest. 2009 Nov;136(5):1237-1248
pubmed: 19696123
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2020 Feb;26(2):142-150
pubmed: 31760113
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2021 Apr 13;76(5):1332-1338
pubmed: 33585908
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2020 Apr 1;75(4):968-978
pubmed: 32016342
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2020 Nov 1;75(11):3230-3238
pubmed: 32789506
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2018 Feb;37(2):325-331
pubmed: 29164361
J Clin Microbiol. 2022 Apr 20;60(4):e0255921
pubmed: 35354293
Infect Dis Now. 2022 Nov;52(8):421-425
pubmed: 36108973
Chest. 2020 Sep;158(3):929-938
pubmed: 32446623