Long-term visual acuity outcomes following cataract surgery in eyes with ocular inflammatory disease.
Epidemiology
Inflammation
Lens and zonules
Treatment Surgery
Vision
Journal
The British journal of ophthalmology
ISSN: 1468-2079
Titre abrégé: Br J Ophthalmol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 0421041
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
21 Feb 2023
21 Feb 2023
Historique:
received:
21
07
2022
accepted:
09
02
2023
entrez:
22
2
2023
pubmed:
23
2
2023
medline:
23
2
2023
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
To evaluate the long-term visual acuity (VA) outcome of cataract surgery in inflammatory eye disease. Tertiary care academic centres. Multicentre retrospective cohort study. A total of 1741 patients with non-infectious inflammatory eye disease (2382 eyes) who underwent cataract surgery while under tertiary uveitis management were included. Standardised chart review was used to gather clinical data. Multivariable logistic regression models with adjustment for intereye correlations were performed to evaluate the prognostic factors for VA outcomes. Main outcome measure was VA after cataract surgery. Uveitic eyes independent of anatomical location showed improved VA from baseline (mean 20/200) to within 3 months (mean 20/63) of cataract surgery and maintained through at least 5 years of follow-up (mean 20/63). Eyes that achieved 20/40 or better VA at 1 year were more likely to have scleritis (OR=1.34, p<0.0001) or anterior uveitis (OR=2.2, p<0.0001), VA 20/50 to 20/80 (OR 4.76 as compared with worse than 20/200, p<0.0001) preoperatively, inactive uveitis (OR=1.49, p=0.03), have undergone phacoemulsification (OR=1.45 as compared with extracapsular cataract extraction, p=0.04) or have had intraocular lens placement (OR=2.13, p=0.01). Adults had better VA immediately after surgery, with only 39% (57/146) paediatric eyes at 20/40 or better at 1 year. Our results suggest that adult and paediatric eyes with uveitis typically have improved VA following cataract surgery and remain stable thereafter for at least 5 years.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36810151
pii: bjo-2022-322236
doi: 10.1136/bjo-2022-322236
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Informations de copyright
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Competing interests: JTR: AbbVie (consultant); Gilead (consultant); Janssen (consultant); Eyevensys (consultant); UpToDate (author/royalties); Pfizer (financial support); Novartis (consultant); Roche (consultant); Alcon Research Institute (financial support); Horizon (financial support and consultant); Revolo (consultant); Neoleukin (consultant); Affibody (consultant); Celgene-Bristol Myers (Data Monitoring Committee); Eli Lilly (Clinical Endpoints Committee). GL-C: AbbVie (consultant, lecture fees); Allergan (grant support); Mallinckrodt (consultant, grant support); Sanofi (grant support, lecture fees). ES: Eyevensys (consultant); Santen (consultant); EyeGate (consultant, financial support); AbbVie (consultant, financial support); Clearside (consultant, financial support); EyePoint (consultant, financial support). SGa: Merit CRO (consultant); NEI (grant support); RPB (grant support). SGr: Olleyes (grant support). JT: AbbVie (consultant); ADVISE/MERIT, NEI (grant support); Gilead (consultant); Roche (consultant); Tarsier Pharma (equity owner); UpToDate (consultant). JHK: Gilead (consultant); Betaliq (equity owner); Tarsier Pharma (equity owner).