Avian regulation of crop and forest pests, a meta-analysis.

biological control ecosystem services natural enemies pest management regulating services

Journal

Pest management science
ISSN: 1526-4998
Titre abrégé: Pest Manag Sci
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100898744

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Jul 2023
Historique:
revised: 27 01 2023
received: 28 07 2022
accepted: 21 02 2023
medline: 2 6 2023
pubmed: 23 2 2023
entrez: 22 2 2023
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Birds have been shown to reduce pest effects on various ecosystem types. This study aimed to synthesize the effect of birds on pest abundance, product damage and yield in agricultural and forest systems in different environments. Our hypothesis is that birds are effective pest regulators that contribute to a reduction in pest abundance, enhancement of yield quality and quantity and economic profit, and that pest regulation may depend on moderators such as the type of ecosystem, climate, pest, and indicator (ecological or economic). We performed a systematic literature review of experimental and observational studies related to biological control in the presence and absence of regulatory birds. We retained 449 observations from 104 primary studies that were evaluated through qualitative and quantitative analyses. Of the 79 studies with known effects of birds on pest regulation, nearly half of the 334 observations showed positive effects (49%), 46% showed neutral effects, and very few (5%) showed negative effects. Overall effect sizes were positive (mean Hedges' d = 0.38 ± 0.06). A multiple model selection retained only ecosystem and indicator types as significant moderators. Our results support our hypothesis that there is a positive effect of avian control of pests for each analyzed moderator and this effect was significant for both ecological and economic indicators. Avian regulation of pests is a potential effective approach for environmentally friendly pest management that can reduce pesticide use regardless of the context of implementation. © 2023 The Authors. Pest Management Science published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Society of Chemical Industry.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Birds have been shown to reduce pest effects on various ecosystem types. This study aimed to synthesize the effect of birds on pest abundance, product damage and yield in agricultural and forest systems in different environments. Our hypothesis is that birds are effective pest regulators that contribute to a reduction in pest abundance, enhancement of yield quality and quantity and economic profit, and that pest regulation may depend on moderators such as the type of ecosystem, climate, pest, and indicator (ecological or economic).
RESULTS RESULTS
We performed a systematic literature review of experimental and observational studies related to biological control in the presence and absence of regulatory birds. We retained 449 observations from 104 primary studies that were evaluated through qualitative and quantitative analyses. Of the 79 studies with known effects of birds on pest regulation, nearly half of the 334 observations showed positive effects (49%), 46% showed neutral effects, and very few (5%) showed negative effects. Overall effect sizes were positive (mean Hedges' d = 0.38 ± 0.06). A multiple model selection retained only ecosystem and indicator types as significant moderators.
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
Our results support our hypothesis that there is a positive effect of avian control of pests for each analyzed moderator and this effect was significant for both ecological and economic indicators. Avian regulation of pests is a potential effective approach for environmentally friendly pest management that can reduce pesticide use regardless of the context of implementation. © 2023 The Authors. Pest Management Science published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Society of Chemical Industry.

Identifiants

pubmed: 36810937
doi: 10.1002/ps.7421
doi:

Types de publication

Systematic Review Meta-Analysis Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

2380-2389

Subventions

Organisme : GOBIERNO REGIONAL DE MADRID (REMEDINAL)
Organisme : Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación
Organisme : Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad
Organisme : Universidad de Alcalá

Informations de copyright

© 2023 The Authors. Pest Management Science published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Society of Chemical Industry.

Références

Stokstad E and Grull G, Pesticide Planet. Science 341:730-731 (2013).
FAO, Pesticides use, pesticides trade and pesticides indicators. Global, regional and country trends, 1990-2019, FAOSTAT Analytical Brief Series No. 29. Rome. (2021).
Green R, Cornell SJ, Scharlemann JPW and Balmford A, Farming and the fate of wild nature. Science 307:550-555 (2005).
Geiger F, Bengtsson J, Berendse F, Weisser WW, Emmerson M, Morales MB et al., Persistent negative effects of pesticides on biodiversity and biological control potential on European farmland. Basic Appl Ecol 11:97-105 (2010).
Hallmann CA, Foppen RPB, van Turnhout CAM, de Kroon H and Jongejans E, Declines in insectivorous birds are associated with high neonicotinoid concentrations. Nature 511:341-343 (2014).
Henry M, Béguin M, Requier F, Rollin O, Odoux J-F, Aupinel P et al., A common pesticide decreases foraging success and survival in honey bees. Science 336:348-350 (2012).
Tilman D, Cassman KG, Matson PA, Naylor R and Polasky S, Agricultural sustainability and intensive production practices. Nature 418:671-677 (2002).
Taylor PJ, Downs S, Monadjem A, Eiseb SJ, Mulungu LS, Massawe AW et al., Experimental treatment-control studies of ecologically based rodent management in Africa: balancing conservation and pest management. Wildl Res 39:51-61 (2012).
Rey Benayas JM and Bullock JM, Restoration of biodiversity and ecosystem services on agricultural land. Ecosystems 15:883-899 (2012).
Tscharntke T, Klein AM, Kruess A, Steffan-Dewenter I and Thies C, Landscape perspectives on agricultural intensification and biodiversity - ecosystem service management. Ecol Lett 8:857-874 (2005).
Balmford A, Green R and Phalan B, What conservationists need to know about farming. Proc R Soc B: Biol Sci 279:2714-2724 (2012).
Railsback SF and Johnson MD, Effects of land use on bird populations and pest control services on coffee farms. Proc Natl Acad Sci 111:6109-6114 (2014).
Daily GC, Polasky S, Goldstein J, Kareiva PM, Mooney HA, Pejchar L et al., Ecosystem services in decision making: time to deliver. Front Ecol Environ 7:21-28 (2009).
Kross SM, Martinico BL, Bourbour RP, Townsend JM, McColl C and Kelsey TR, Effects of field and landscape scale habitat on insect and bird damage to sunflowers. Front Sustainable Food Syst 4:40 (2020).
Basiago AD, Economic, social, and environmental sustainability in development theory and urban planning practice. Environmentalist 19:145-161 (1998).
Rey Benayas JM, Meltzer J, Heras-bravo DD, and Cayuela L, Potential of pest regulation by insectivorous birds in Mediterranean woody crops, 1-19 (2017).
García D, Miñarro M and Martínez-Sastre R, Enhancing ecosystem services in apple orchards: nest boxes increase pest control by insectivorous birds. J Appl Ecol 58:465-475 (2021).
Takekawa JY, Garton EO and Langelier LA, Biological control of forest insect outbreaks: the use of avian predators. Trans North Am Wildlife Nat Resour Conf 47:393-409 (1982).
Greenberg R, Bichier P, Angon AC, MacVean C, Perez R and Cano E, The impact of avian insectivory on arthropods and leaf damage in some guatemalan coffee plantations. Ecology 81:1750-1755 (2000).
Mols CMM and Visser ME, Great tits can reduce caterpillar damage in apple orchards. J Appl Ecol 39:888-899 (2002).
Karp DS, Mendenhall CD, Sandí RF, Chaumont N, Ehrlich PR, Hadly EA et al., Forest bolsters bird abundance, pest control and coffee yield. Ecol Lett 16:1339-1347 (2013).
Kross SM, Kelsey TR, McColl CJ and Townsend JM, Field-scale habitat complexity enhances avian conservation and avian-mediated pest-control services in an intensive agricultural crop. Agric Ecosyst Environ 225:140-149 (2016).
Karp DS and Daily GC, Cascading effects of insectivorous birds and bats in tropical coffee plantations. Ecology 95:1065-1074 (2014).
García D, Miñarro M and Martínez-Sastre R, Birds as suppliers of pest control in cider apple orchards: avian biodiversity drivers and insectivory effect. Agric Ecosyst Environ 254:233-243 (2018).
Ji R, Simpson SJ, Yu F, He QX and Yun CJ, Diets of migratory rosy starlings (Passeriformes: Sturnidae) and their effects on grasshoppers: implications for a biological agent for insect pests. Biol Control 46:547-551 (2008).
Sanz JJ, Experimentally increased insectivorous bird density results in a reduction of caterpillar density and leaf damage to Pyrenean oak. Ecol Res 16:387-394 (2001).
Lundberg J and Moberg F, Mobile link organisms and ecosystem functioning: implications for ecosystem resilience and management. Ecosystems 6:0087-0098 (2003).
Boesing AL, Nichols E and Metzger JP, Effects of landscape structure on avian-mediated insect pest control services: a review. Landsc Ecol 32:931-944 (2017).
Holmes RT, Schultz JC and Nothnagle P, Bird predation on forest insects: an exclosure experiment. Science 206:462-463 (1979).
Peisley RK, Saunders ME and Luck GW, Providing perches for predatory and aggressive birds appears to reduce the negative impact of frugivorous birds in vineyards. Wildl Res 44:334-342 (2017).
Tscharntke T, Karp DS, Chaplin-Kramer R, Batáry P, DeClerck F, Gratton C et al., When natural habitat fails to enhance biological pest control - five hypotheses. Biol Conserv 204:449-458 (2016).
Donázar JA, Cortés-Avizanda A, Fargallo JA, Margalida A, Moleón M, Morales-Reyes Z et al., Roles of raptors in a changing world: from flagships to providers of key ecosystem services. Ardeola 63:181-234 (2016).
Sekercioglu C, Increasing awareness of avian ecological function. Trends Ecol Evol 21:464-471 (2006).
Callicott JB and Mumford K, Ecological sustainability as a conservation concept. Conserv Biol 11:32-40 (1997).
Köppen WP, Das geographische System der Klimate, in Handbuch der Klimatologie, erlagsbuchhandlung Gebrüder, ed. by Koppen W and Geiger R. Borntraeger, Berlin (1936).
Koricheva J, Gurevitch J and Mengersen K, Handbook of Meta-Analysis in Ecology and Evolution. Princeton University Press, Princeton (2013).
Grissom RJ and Kim JJ, Effect Sizes for Research: A Broad Practical Approach., Xv, 253. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers, Mahwah, NJ, US (2005).
Light RJ and Smith PV, Accumulating evidence: procedures for resolving contradictions among different research studies. Harv Educ Rev 41:429-471 (1971).
Floress K, Huff ES, Snyder SA, Koshollek A, Butler S and Allred SB, Factors associated with family forest owner actions: a vote-count meta-analysis. Landscape Urban Plann 188:19-29 (2019).
Hedges L and Olkin I, Introduction, in Statistical Methods for Meta-Analysis. Orlando, FL: Academic Press. (1985).
R Core Team, R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, https://www.R-project.org/, Vienna, Austria (2022).
Hedges LV, Distribution theory for Glass's estimator of effect size and related estimators. J Educ Behav Stat 6:107-128 (1981).
Borenstein M, Hedges LV, Higgins JPT and Rothstein HR, A basic introduction to fixed-effect and random-effects models for meta-analysis. Res Synth Methods 1:97-111 (2010).
Viechtbauer W, Conducting meta-analyses in R with the “metafor” package. J Stat Software 36:1-48 (2010).
Cochran WG, The combination of estimates from different experiments. Biometrics 10:101-129 (1954).
Higgins JPT and Thompson SG, Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis. Stat Med 21:1539-1558 (2002).
Hothorn T, Bretz F and Westfall P, Simultaneous inference in general parametric models. Biom J 50:346-363 (2008).
Sterne JAC and Egger M, Funnel plots for detecting bias in meta-analysis: guidelines on choice of axis. J Clin Epidemiol 54:1046-1055 (2001).
Rosenthal R, The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results. Psychol Bull 86:638-641 (1979).
Viechtbauer W and Cheung MW-L, Outlier and influence diagnostics for meta-analysis. Res Synth Methods 1:112-125 (2010).
Winter S, Bauer T, Strauss P, Kratschmer S, Paredes D, Popescu D et al., Effects of vegetation management intensity on biodiversity and ecosystem services in vineyards: a meta-analysis. J Appl Ecol 55:2484-2495 (2018).
Peisley RK, Saunders ME and Luck GW, Cost-benefit trade-offs of bird activity in apple orchards. PeerJ 4:e2179 (2016).
Jedlicka JA, Greenberg R and Letourneau DK, Avian conservation practices strengthen ecosystem services in California vineyards. PLoS One 6:e27347 (2011).
Kross SM, Tylianakis JM and Nelson XJ, Effects of introducing threatened falcons into vineyards on abundance of passeriformes and bird damage to grapes. Conserv Biol 26:142-149 (2012).
Martínez-Núñez C, Rey PJ, Manzaneda AJ, García D, Tarifa R and Molina JL, Insectivorous birds are not effective pest control agents in olive groves. Basic Appl Ecol 56:270-280 (2021).
Borkhataria RR, Collazo JA and Groom MJ, Additive effects of vertebrate predators on insects in a Puerto Rican coffee plantation. Ecol Appl 16:696-703 (2006).
Kellermann JL, Johnson MD, Stercho AM and Hackett SC, Ecological and economic services provided by birds on Jamaican Blue Mountain coffee farms. Conserv Biol 22:1177-1185 (2008).
Peters VE and Greenberg R, Fruit supplementation affects birds but not arthropod predation by birds in costa Rican agroforestry systems. Biotropica 45:102-110 (2013).
Martínez-Salinas A, DeClerck F, Vierling K, Vierling L, Legal L, Vílchez-Mendoza S et al., Bird functional diversity supports pest control services in a Costa Rican coffee farm. Agric Ecosyst Environ 235:277-288 (2016).
Maas B, Clough Y and Tscharntke T, Bats and birds increase crop yield in tropical agroforestry landscapes. Ecol Lett 16:1480-1487 (2013).
Johnson MD, Kellermann JL and Stercho AM, Pest reduction services by birds in shade and sun coffee in Jamaica. Anim Conserv 13:140-147 (2010).
Classen A, Peters MK, Ferger SW, Helbig-Bonitz M, Schmack JM, Maassen G et al., Complementary ecosystem services provided by pest predators and pollinators increase quantity and quality of coffee yields. Proc R Soc B: Biol Sci 281:20133148 (2014).
Atkins A, Redpath SM, Little RM and Amar A, Experimentally manipulating the landscape of fear to manage problem animals. J Wildlife Manage 81:610-616 (2017).
Kitowski I, The response of Eurasian kestrel Falco tinnunculus to falconry at Deblin military airfield, east Poland. Turk J Zool 38:298-305 (2014).
Ndang'ang'a PK, Njoroge JBM and Vickery J, Quantifying the contribution of birds to the control of arthropod pests on kale, Brassica oleracea acephala, a key crop in east African highland farmland. Int J Pest Manage 59:211-216 (2013).
Tremblay A, Mineau P and Stewart RK, Effects of bird predation on some pest insect populations in corn. Agric Ecosyst Environ 83:143-152 (2001).
Joern A, Experimental study of avian predation on coexisting grasshopper populations (Orthoptera: Acrididae) in a sandhills grassland. Oikos 46:243 (2006).
Bock CE, Bocks JH and Grant MC, Effects of bird predation on grasshopper densities in an Arizona grassland. Ecology 73:1706-1717 (1992).
Labuschagne L, Swanepoel LH, Taylor PJ, Belmain SR and Keith M, Are avian predators effective biological control agents for rodent pest management in agricultural systems? Biol Control 101:94-102 (2016).
Marquis RJ and Whelan CJ, Insectivorous birds increase growth of white oak through consumption of leaf-chewing insects. Ecol Soc Am 75:2007-2014 (1994).
Martinson TJ and Flaspohler DJ, Winter bird feeding and localized predation on simulated bark-dwelling arthropods. Wildl Soc Bull 31:510-516 (2003).
Bereczki K, Ódor P, Csóka G, Mag Z and Báldi A, Effects of forest heterogeneity on the efficiency of caterpillar control service provided by birds in temperate oak forests. For Ecol Manage 327:96-105 (2014).
Bereczki K, Hajdu K and Báldi A, Effects of forest edge on pest control service provided by birds in fragmented temperate forests. Acta Zool Acad Sci Hung 61:289-304 (2015).
Wood KA, Negative results provide valuable evidence for conservation. Perspect Ecol Conservation 18:235-237 (2020).
Whelan CJ, Wenny DG and Marquis RJ, Ecosystem services provided by birds. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1134:25-60 (2008).
Díaz-Siefer P, Olmos-Moya N, Fontúrbel FE, Lavandero B, Pozo RA and Celis-Diez JL, Bird-mediated effects of pest control services on crop productivity: a global synthesis. J Pest Sci 95:567-576 (2021).
Bianchi FJJA, Booij CJH and Tscharntke T, Sustainable pest regulation in agricultural landscapes: a review on landscape composition, biodiversity and natural pest control. Proc Biol Sci 273:1715-1727 (2006).
Gardiner MM, Landis DA, Gratton C, Schmidt N, O'Neal M, Mueller E et al., Landscape composition influences patterns of native and exotic lady beetle abundance. Diversity Distrib 15:554-564 (2009).
Schroll JB, Moustgaard R and Gøtzsche PC, Dealing with substantial heterogeneity in Cochrane reviews. Cross-sectional study. BMC Med Res Methodol 11:22 (2011).
Tela M, Cresswell W and Chapman H, Assessment of pest control services by vertebrates in Nigerian subsistence maize farms. Conserv Soc 19:218 (2021).
Norrdahl K and Korpimäki E, Effects of predator removal on vertebrate prey populations: birds of prey and small mammals. Oecologia 103:241-248 (1995).
Vibe-Petersen S, Leirs H and Bruyn LD, Effects of predation and dispersal on Mastomys natalensis population dynamics in Tanzanian maize fields. J Anim Ecol 75:213-220 (2006).
Paz A, Jareño D, Arroyo L, Viñuela J, Arroyo B, Mougeot F et al., Avian predators as a biological control system of common vole (Microtus arvalis) populations in North-Western Spain: experimental set-up and preliminary results. Pest Manag Sci 69:444-450 (2013).
Pejchar L, Clough Y, Ekroos J, Nicholas KA, Olsson O, Ram D et al., Net effects of birds in agroecosystems. Bioscience 68:896-904 (2018).
Martin EA, Reineking B, Seo B and Steffan-Dewenter I, Natural enemy interactions constrain pest control in complex agricultural landscapes. Proc Natl Acad Sci 110:5534-5539 (2013).
Grass I, Lehmann K, Thies C and Tscharntke T, Insectivorous birds disrupt biological control of cereal aphids. Ecology 98:1583-1590 (2017).
Olimpi EM, Garcia K, Gonthier DJ, Kremen C, Snyder WE, Wilson-Rankin EE et al., Semi-natural habitat surrounding farms promotes multifunctionality in avian ecosystem services. J Appl Ecol 59:898-908 (2022).
Garcia K, Olimpi EM, Karp DS and Gonthier DJ, The good, the bad, and the risky: can birds be incorporated as biological control agents into integrated pest management programs? J Integr Pest Manage 11:11 (2020).
Smith OM, Kennedy CM, Echeverri A, Karp DS, Latimer CE, Taylor JM et al., Complex landscapes stabilize farm bird communities and their expected ecosystem services. J Appl Ecol 59:927-941 (2022).
Gras P, Tscharntke T, Maas B, Tjoa A, Hafsah A and Clough Y, How ants, birds and bats affect crop yield along shade gradients in tropical cacao agroforestry. J Appl Ecol 53:953-963 (2016).
Garfinkel M and Johnson M, Pest-removal services provided by birds on small organic farms in northern California. Agric Ecosyst Environ 211:24-31 (2015).
Cassano CR, Silva RM, Mariano-Neto E, Schroth G and Faria D, Bat and bird exclusion but not shade cover influence arthropod abundance and cocoa leaf consumption in agroforestry landscape in Northeast Brazil. Agric Ecosyst Environ 232:247-253 (2016).
Lehtonen M, The environmental-social interface of sustainable development: capabilities, social capital, institutions. Ecol Econ 49:199-214 (2004).
Martínez-Salinas A, Chain-Guadarrama A, Aristizábal N, Vilchez-Mendoza S, Cerda R and Ricketts TH, Interacting pest control and pollination services in coffee systems. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 119:e2119959119 (2022).
Borkhataria RR, Nuessly GS, Pearlstine E and Cherry RH, Effects of blackbirds (Agelaius phoenicius) on stink bug (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae) populations, damage, and yield in Florida rice. Fla Entomol 95:143-149 (2012).
Monteagudo N, Rey Benayas JM, Andivia E and Rebollo S, Avian regulation of crop and forest pests, a meta-analysis [Data set]. figshare. https://doi.org/10.6084/M9.FIGSHARE.22141940.V2 (2023)

Auteurs

Navila Monteagudo (N)

Universidad de Alcalá, Departamento Ciencias de la Vida, Grupo de Ecología y Restauración Forestal (FORECO), Alcalá de Henares, Spain.

José María Rey Benayas (JMR)

Universidad de Alcalá, Departamento Ciencias de la Vida, Grupo de Ecología y Restauración Forestal (FORECO), Alcalá de Henares, Spain.
Fundación Internacional para la Restauración de Ecosistemas (FIRE), Madrid, Spain.

Enrique Andivia (E)

Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Departamento de Biodiversidad, Ecología y Evolución, Facultad de Ciencias Biológicas, Madrid, Spain.

Salvador Rebollo (S)

Universidad de Alcalá, Departamento Ciencias de la Vida, Grupo de Ecología y Restauración Forestal (FORECO), Alcalá de Henares, Spain.
Fundación Internacional para la Restauración de Ecosistemas (FIRE), Madrid, Spain.

Articles similaires

Robotic Surgical Procedures Animals Humans Telemedicine Models, Animal

Odour generalisation and detection dog training.

Lyn Caldicott, Thomas W Pike, Helen E Zulch et al.
1.00
Animals Odorants Dogs Generalization, Psychological Smell
Animals TOR Serine-Threonine Kinases Colorectal Neoplasms Colitis Mice
Animals Tail Swine Behavior, Animal Animal Husbandry

Classifications MeSH