Three-dimensional vision versus two-dimensional vision on laparoscopic performance of trainee surgeons: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
FLS
Laparoscopic skills
Three-dimensional vision
Trainee surgeons
Two-dimensional vision
Journal
Updates in surgery
ISSN: 2038-3312
Titre abrégé: Updates Surg
Pays: Italy
ID NLM: 101539818
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Apr 2023
Apr 2023
Historique:
received:
20
11
2022
accepted:
10
02
2023
medline:
29
3
2023
pubmed:
23
2
2023
entrez:
22
2
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Laparoscopic surgery underwent great improvements during the last few years. This review aims to compare the performance of Trainee Surgeons using 2D versus 3D/4 K laparoscopy. A systematic review of the literature was done on Pubmed, Embase, Cochrane's Library and Scopus. The following words and key phrases have been searched: "Two-dimensional vision", "Three-dimensional vision", "2D and 3D laparoscopy", "Trainee surgeons". This systematic review was reported according to the PRISMA statement 2020. PROSPERO registration No. CRD42022328045. Twenty-two randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and two observational studies were included in the systematic review. Two trials were carried out in a clinical setting, and twenty-two trials were performed in a simulated setting. In studies involving the use of a box trainer, the number of errors in the 2D laparoscopic group was significantly higher than in the 3D laparoscopic group during the performance of FLS skill tasks: peg transfer (MD: -0.82; 95% CI - 1.17 to - 0.47; p < 0.00001), cutting (MD: - 1.09; 95% CI - 1.50 to - 0.69 p < 0.00001), suturing (MD: - 0.48; 95% CI - 0.83 to - 0.13 p = 0.007), However, in clinical studies, there was no significant difference in the time taken for laparoscopic total hysterectomy (MD: 8.71; 95% CI - 13.55 to 30.98; p = 0.44) and vaginal cuff closure (MD: 2.00; 95% CI - 0.72 to - 4.72; p = 0.15) between 2D group and 3D group. 3D laparoscopy facilitates learning for novice surgeons and shows improvements in their laparoscopic performance.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36811183
doi: 10.1007/s13304-023-01465-z
pii: 10.1007/s13304-023-01465-z
doi:
Types de publication
Meta-Analysis
Systematic Review
Journal Article
Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
455-470Informations de copyright
© 2023. Italian Society of Surgery (SIC).
Références
Smith R, Day A, Rockall T, Ballard K, Bailey M, Jourdan I (2012) Advanced stereoscopic projection technology significantly improves novice performance of minimally invasive surgical skills. Surg Endosc. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-011-2080-8
doi: 10.1007/s00464-011-2080-8
pubmed: 23239301
Lusch A, Bucur PL, Menhadji AD, Okhunov Z, Liss MA, Perez-Lanzac A, McDougall EM, Landman J (2014) Evaluation of the impact of three-dimensional vision on laparoscopic performance. J Endourol. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2013.0344
doi: 10.1089/end.2013.0344
pubmed: 25211698
Heemskerk J, Zandbergen R, Maessen JG, Greve JW, Bouvy ND (2006) Advantages of advanced laparoscopic systems. Surg Endosc. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-005-0456-3
doi: 10.1007/s00464-005-0456-3
pubmed: 16528462
Özsoy M, Kallidonis P, Kyriazis I, Panagopoulos V, Vasilas M, Sakellaropoulos GC, Liatsikos E (2015) Novice surgeons: do they benefit from 3D laparoscopy? Lasers Med Sci 30(4):1325–1333. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-015-1739-0
doi: 10.1007/s10103-015-1739-0
pubmed: 25772250
Dawidek MT, Roach VA, Ott MC, Wilson TD (2017) Changing the learning curve in novice laparoscopists: incorporating direct visualization into the simulation training program. J Surg Educ. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsurg.2016.07.012
doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2016.07.012
pubmed: 27717706
Lerner V, DeStephano C, Ulrich A, Han ES, LeClaire E, Chen CCG (2021) A systematic review of validity evidence for the fundamentals of laparoscopic surgery examination in gynecology. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2021.04.010
doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2021.04.010
pubmed: 34029745
Zheng B, Hur HC, Johnson S, Swanström LL (2010) Validity of using fundamentals of laparoscopic surgery (FLS) program to assess laparoscopic competence for gynecologists. Surg Endosc. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-009-0539-7
doi: 10.1007/s00464-009-0539-7
pubmed: 20848140
Antosh DD, Auguste T, George EA, Sokol AI, Gutman RE, Iglesia CB, Desale SY, Park AJ (2013) Blinded assessment of operative performance after fundamentals of laparoscopic surgery in gynecology training. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2012.12.004
doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2012.12.004
pubmed: 23352581
Wenzl R, Lehner R, Vry U, Pateisky N, Sevelda P, Husslein P (1994) Three-dimensional video-endoscopy: clinical use in gynaecological laparoscopy. Lancet. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(94)90412-x
doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(94)90412-x
pubmed: 7983998
Chiu CJ, Lobo Prabhu K, Tan-Tam CC, Panton ON, Meneghetti A (2015) Using three-dimensional laparoscopy as a novel training tool for novice trainees compared with two-dimensional laparoscopy. Am J Surg. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2015.01.007
doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2015.01.007
pubmed: 25795176
Tanagho YS, Andriole GL, Paradis AG, Madison KM, Sandhu GS, Varela JE, Benway BM (2012) 2D versus 3D visualization: impact on laparoscopic proficiency using the fundamentals of laparoscopic surgery skill set. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech. https://doi.org/10.1089/lap.2012.0220
doi: 10.1089/lap.2012.0220
Buia A, Stockhausen F, Filmann N, Hanisch E (2017) 3D vs. 2D imaging in laparoscopic surgery-an advantage? Results of standardised black box training in laparoscopic surgery. Langenbecks Arch Surg. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-016-1526-9
doi: 10.1007/s00423-016-1526-9
pubmed: 28986719
Thomaschewski M, Jürgens T, Keck T, Laubert T, Benecke C (2021) Learning laparoscopic surgery skills with a 4K ultra-high definition 2D vs a three-dimensional HD laparoscopic system: results from a prospective randomized trial. Surg Innov. https://doi.org/10.1177/1553350621991224
doi: 10.1177/1553350621991224
pubmed: 33530845
Spille J, Wenners A, von Hehn U, Maass N, Pecks U, Mettler L, Alkatout I (2017) 2D versus 3D in laparoscopic surgery by beginners and experts: a randomized controlled trial on a pelvitrainer in objectively graded surgical steps. J Surg Educ. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsurg.2017.01.011
doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2017.01.011
pubmed: 28215494
Noureldin YA, Stoica A, Kaneva P, Andonian S (2016) Impact of training on three-dimensional versus two-dimensional laparoscopic systems on acquisition of laparoscopic skills in novices: a prospective comparative pilot study. Biomed Res Int. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/4197693
doi: 10.1155/2016/4197693
pubmed: 27995141
pmcid: 5138442
Montanari E, Schwameis R, Veit-Rubin N, Kuessel L, Husslein H (2020) Basic laparoscopic skills training is equally effective using 2D compared to 3D visualization: a randomized controlled trial. J Clin Med. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm9051408
doi: 10.3390/jcm9051408
pubmed: 32397586
pmcid: 7290278
Ouzzani M, Hammady H, Fedorowicz Z, Elmagarmid A (2016) Rayyan-a web and mobile app for systematic reviews. Syst Rev. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-016-0384-4
doi: 10.1186/s13643-016-0384-4
pubmed: 27919275
pmcid: 5139140
Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, Shamseer L, Tetzlaff JM, Akl EA, Brennan SE, Chou R, Glanville J, Grimshaw JM, Hróbjartsson A, Lalu MM, Li T, Loder EW, Mayo-Wilson E, McDonald S, McGuinness LA, Stewart LA, Thomas J, Tricco AC, Welch VA, Whiting P, Moher D (2021) The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. J Clin Epidemiol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.03.001
doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.03.001
pubmed: 34780979
Wan X, Wang W, Liu J et al (2014) Estimating the sample mean and standard deviation from the sample size, median, range and/or interquartile range. BMC Med Res Methodol. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-14-135
doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-14-135
pubmed: 25524443
pmcid: 4383202
Higgins JPT, Thomas J, Chandler J, Cumpston M, Li T, Page MJ, Welch VA (editors) (2022) Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions version 6.3 (updated February 2022). Cochrane. Available from www.training.cochrane.org/handbook
Wilhelm D, Reiser S, Kohn N, Witte M, Leiner U, Mühlbach L, Ruschin D, Reiner W, Feussner H (2014) Comparative evaluation of HD 2D/3D laparoscopic monitors and benchmarking to a theoretically ideal 3D pseudodisplay: even well-experienced laparoscopists perform better with 3D. Surg Endosc. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-014-3487-9
doi: 10.1007/s00464-014-3487-9
pubmed: 25125098
Storz P, Buess GF, Kunert W, Kirschniak A (2012) 3D HD versus 2D HD: surgical task efficiency in standardised phantom tasks. Surg Endosc. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-011-2055-9
doi: 10.1007/s00464-011-2055-9
pubmed: 22806526
McDougall EM, Soble JJ, Wolf JS Jr, Nakada SY, Elashry OM, Clayman RV (1996) Comparison of three-dimensional and two-dimensional laparoscopic video systems. J Endourol. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.1996.10.371
doi: 10.1089/end.1996.10.371
pubmed: 8872737
de Almeida RA, Qureshi YA, Morawala AJ, Merali NH, Iloabachie I, Alaraimia B, Patela B (2018) Impact of 3D laparoscopic surgical training on performance in standard 2D laparoscopic simulation: a randomised prospective study. J Surg Simulation 5:1–7. https://doi.org/10.1102/2051-7726.2018.0001
doi: 10.1102/2051-7726.2018.0001
Poudel S, Kurashima Y, Watanabe Y et al (2017) Impact of 3D in the training of basic laparoscopic skills and its transferability to 2D environment: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Surg Endosc. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-016-5074-8
doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-5074-8
pubmed: 29124407
Abdelrahman M, Belramman A, Salem R, Patel B (2018) Acquiring basic and advanced laparoscopic skills in novices using two-dimensional (2D), three-dimensional (3D) and ultra-high definition (4K) vision systems: a randomized control study. Int J Surg. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2018.03.080
doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2018.03.080
pubmed: 29656132
Alaraimi B, El Bakbak W, Sarker S, Makkiyah S, Al-Marzouq A, Goriparthi R, Bouhelal A, Quan V, Patel B (2014) A randomized prospective study comparing acquisition of laparoscopic skills in three-dimensional (3D) vs. two-dimensional (2D) laparoscopy. World J Surg. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-014-2674-0
doi: 10.1007/s00268-014-2674-0
pubmed: 25002241
Votanopoulos K, Brunicardi FC, Thornby J, Bellows CF (2008) Impact of three-dimensional vision in laparoscopic training. World J Surg. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-007-9253-6
doi: 10.1007/s00268-007-9253-6
pubmed: 17992561
Sahm M, Danzer C, Grimm AL, Herrmann C, Mantke R (2022) Must clinics replace 2D by 3D environments for an efficient training of laparoscopic novices? A critical analysis of the learning curve for basic skills. Front Surg. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2021.792107
doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2021.792107
pubmed: 35111805
pmcid: 8801449
Nolan GJ, Howell S, Hewett P (2015) Impact of three-dimensional imaging in acquisition of laparoscopic skills in novice operators. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. https://doi.org/10.1089/lap.2014.0608
doi: 10.1089/lap.2014.0608
pubmed: 25767938
Kang ML, Wong CMJ, Tan H, Bohari A, Han TO, Soon Y (2021) A secondary learning curve in 3D versus 2D imaging in laparoscopic training of surgical novices. Surg Endosc. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-020-07466-y
doi: 10.1007/s00464-020-07466-y
pubmed: 34845550
pmcid: 8921151
Cologne KG, Zehetner J, Liwanag L, Cash C, Senagore AJ, Lipham JC (2015) Three-dimensional laparoscopy: does improved visualization decrease the learning curve among trainees in advanced procedures? Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLE.0000000000000168
doi: 10.1097/SLE.0000000000000168
pubmed: 26053113
Harada H, Kanaji S, Hasegawa H, Yamamoto M, Matsuda Y, Yamashita K, Matsuda T, Oshikiri T, Sumi Y, Nakamura T, Suzuki S, Kakeji Y (2018) The effect on surgical skills of expert surgeons using 3D/HD and 2D/4K resolution monitors in laparoscopic phantom tasks. Surg Endosc. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-018-6169-1
doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6169-1
pubmed: 29603005
Ashraf A, Collins D, Whelan M, O’Sullivan R, Balfe P (2015) Three-dimensional (3D) simulation versus two-dimensional (2D) enhances surgical skills acquisition in standardised laparoscopic tasks: a before and after study. Int J Surg. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2014.12.020
doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2014.12.020
pubmed: 25560749
Ajao MO, Larsen CR, Manoucheri E, Goggins ER, Rask MT, Cox MKB, Mushinski A, Gu X, Cohen SL, Rudnicki M, Einarsson JI (2020) Two-dimensional (2D) versus three-dimensional (3D) laparoscopy for vaginal cuff closure by surgeons-in-training: a randomized controlled trial. Surg Endosc. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-019-06886-9
doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-06886-9
pubmed: 31172324
Restaino S, Vargiu V, Rosati A, Bruno M, Dinoi G, Cola E, Moroni R, Scambia G, Fanfani F (2021) 4K versus 3D total laparoscopic hysterectomy by resident in training: a prospective randomised trial. Facts Views Vis Obgyn. https://doi.org/10.52054/FVVO.13.3.027
doi: 10.52054/FVVO.13.3.027
pubmed: 34555876
pmcid: 8823275
Beattie KL, Hill A, Horswill MS, Grove PM, Stevenson ARL (2021) Laparoscopic skills training: the effects of viewing mode (2D vs. 3D) on skill acquisition and transfer. Surg Endosc. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-020-07923-8
doi: 10.1007/s00464-020-07923-8
pubmed: 34370121
pmcid: 8351236
Blavier A, Gaudissart Q, Cadière GB, Nyssen AS (2006) Impact of 2D and 3D vision on performance of novice subjects using da Vinci robotic system. Acta Chir Belg. https://doi.org/10.1080/00015458.2006.11679976
doi: 10.1080/00015458.2006.11679976
pubmed: 17290690
Arezzo A, Vettoretto N, Francis NK, Bonino MA, Curtis NJ, Amparore D, Arolfo S, Barberio M, Boni L, Brodie R, Bouvy N, Cassinotti E, Carus T, Checcucci E, Custers P, Diana M, Jansen M, Jaspers J, Marom G, Momose K, Müller-Stich BP, Nakajima K, Nickel F, Perretta S, Porpiglia F, Sánchez-Margallo F, Sánchez-Margallo JA, Schijven M, Silecchia G, Passera R, Mintz Y (2019) The use of 3D laparoscopic imaging systems in surgery: EAES consensus development conference 2018. Surg Endosc. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-018-06612-x
doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-06612-x
pubmed: 31741153
pmcid: 7853029
Raspagliesi F, Bogani G, Martinelli F, Signorelli M, Scaffa C, Sabatucci I, Lorusso D, Ditto A (2017) 3D vision improves outcomes in early cervical cancer treated with laparoscopic type B radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy. Tumori. https://doi.org/10.5301/tj.5000572
doi: 10.5301/tj.5000572
pubmed: 27716879
Fanfani F, Rossitto C, Restaino S, Ercoli A, Chiantera V, Monterossi G, Barbati G, Scambia G (2016) How technology can impact surgeon performance: a randomized trial comparing 3-dimensional versus 2-dimensional laparoscopy in gynecology oncology. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2016.03.020
doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2016.03.020
pubmed: 27247263
Sørensen SM, Savran MM, Konge L, Bjerrum F (2016) Three-dimensional versus two-dimensional vision in laparoscopy: a systematic review. Surg Endosc. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-015-4189-7
doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4189-7
pubmed: 27770252
pmcid: 5411407