Hemodynamic responses to 1 MAC desflurane inhalation during anesthesia induction with propofol bolus and remifentanil continuous infusion: a prospective randomized single-blind clinical investigation.
Adult
Humans
Young Adult
Remifentanil
/ pharmacology
Propofol
/ pharmacology
Desflurane
/ pharmacology
Sevoflurane
/ pharmacology
Prospective Studies
Single-Blind Method
Piperidines
/ adverse effects
Hemodynamics
Anesthesia, General
Heart Rate
Anesthetics, Inhalation
/ pharmacology
Anesthetics, Intravenous
/ pharmacology
Isoflurane
/ pharmacology
Age
Desflurane
Hemodynamic response
Remifentanil
Sevoflurane
Journal
BMC anesthesiology
ISSN: 1471-2253
Titre abrégé: BMC Anesthesiol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100968535
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
22 02 2023
22 02 2023
Historique:
received:
22
11
2022
accepted:
01
02
2023
entrez:
23
2
2023
pubmed:
24
2
2023
medline:
25
2
2023
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Desflurane is not recommended during anesthesia induction because of its sympathetic stimulation effect, particularly in patients with myocardial ischemic disease. To date, the hemodynamic response to 1 MAC desflurane inhalation in combination with remifentanil infusion during anesthesia induction has rarely been reported. This investigation was designed to compare hemodynamic responses to 1 MAC desflurane (group D, n = 200) with sevoflurane (group S, n = 200) during anesthesia induction and endotracheal intubation in adult patients undergoing elective spine surgery. Subgroup analysis of the different age subgroups was also performed. With continuous infusion of remifentanil 0.1 μg/kg/min, anesthesia was induced with propofol bolus, and endotracheal intubation was performed after muscle relaxation. Heart rate (HR) and mean arterial blood pressure (MAP) were measured every minute for 5 min after anesthesia induction (T1-5) and after endotracheal intubation (T6-10). HR was significantly higher in group D (n = 182) than in group S (n = 173) at T3-10 except at T6 (1 min after intubation) (all P < 0.05). In the age-based subgroup analyses, which subdivided the group D and S into four subgroups based on patient's age, the changes in HR from baseline values were significantly different between the coeval subgroups of patients in their 20-29 years and 30-39 years of age (all P < 0.05). MAP was reduced from baseline value, irrespective of group and age. Inhalation of 1 MAC desflurane during anesthesia induction with propofol bolus and remifentanil continuous infusion and during endotracheal intubation was more likely to induce elevations in HR more likely than 1 MAC sevoflurane, especially in younger patients. This study was registered in the Clinical Research Information Service (CRIS, http://cris.nih.go.kr ) of the Republic of Korea on Feb 12, 2016 (Registration No. KCT 0,001,813).
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Desflurane is not recommended during anesthesia induction because of its sympathetic stimulation effect, particularly in patients with myocardial ischemic disease. To date, the hemodynamic response to 1 MAC desflurane inhalation in combination with remifentanil infusion during anesthesia induction has rarely been reported.
METHODS
This investigation was designed to compare hemodynamic responses to 1 MAC desflurane (group D, n = 200) with sevoflurane (group S, n = 200) during anesthesia induction and endotracheal intubation in adult patients undergoing elective spine surgery. Subgroup analysis of the different age subgroups was also performed. With continuous infusion of remifentanil 0.1 μg/kg/min, anesthesia was induced with propofol bolus, and endotracheal intubation was performed after muscle relaxation. Heart rate (HR) and mean arterial blood pressure (MAP) were measured every minute for 5 min after anesthesia induction (T1-5) and after endotracheal intubation (T6-10).
RESULTS
HR was significantly higher in group D (n = 182) than in group S (n = 173) at T3-10 except at T6 (1 min after intubation) (all P < 0.05). In the age-based subgroup analyses, which subdivided the group D and S into four subgroups based on patient's age, the changes in HR from baseline values were significantly different between the coeval subgroups of patients in their 20-29 years and 30-39 years of age (all P < 0.05). MAP was reduced from baseline value, irrespective of group and age.
CONCLUSION
Inhalation of 1 MAC desflurane during anesthesia induction with propofol bolus and remifentanil continuous infusion and during endotracheal intubation was more likely to induce elevations in HR more likely than 1 MAC sevoflurane, especially in younger patients.
TRIAL REGISTRATION
This study was registered in the Clinical Research Information Service (CRIS, http://cris.nih.go.kr ) of the Republic of Korea on Feb 12, 2016 (Registration No. KCT 0,001,813).
Identifiants
pubmed: 36814199
doi: 10.1186/s12871-023-02002-6
pii: 10.1186/s12871-023-02002-6
pmc: PMC9945592
doi:
Substances chimiques
Remifentanil
P10582JYYK
Propofol
YI7VU623SF
Desflurane
CRS35BZ94Q
Sevoflurane
38LVP0K73A
Piperidines
0
Anesthetics, Inhalation
0
Anesthetics, Intravenous
0
Isoflurane
CYS9AKD70P
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
59Informations de copyright
© 2023. The Author(s).
Références
Anesthesiology. 1994 May;80(5):1035-45
pubmed: 8017643
Circ Res. 1971 Oct;29(4):424-31
pubmed: 5110922
Anesthesiology. 1993 Sep;79(3):444-53
pubmed: 8363068
Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2003 Dec;20(12):945-51
pubmed: 14690095
Anesthesiology. 1992 Jul;77(1):47-62
pubmed: 1535185
Anesthesiology. 1996 Oct;85(4):737-47
pubmed: 8873543
Anesthesiology. 1995 Jul;83(1):88-95
pubmed: 7605024
Anesthesiology. 1995 Dec;83(6):1173-8
pubmed: 8533909
Anesth Analg. 1991 Aug;73(2):143-56
pubmed: 1854029
Turk J Anaesthesiol Reanim. 2019 Jun;47(3):165-172
pubmed: 31183461
Can J Anaesth. 1998 Jun;45(6):533-40
pubmed: 9669006
Br J Anaesth. 2001 Nov;87(5):748-54
pubmed: 11878527
Anesth Analg. 1996 Apr;82(4):821-6
pubmed: 8615504
Anesthesiology. 1994 Oct;81(4):843-9
pubmed: 7943835
Br J Anaesth. 1996 Feb;76(2):179-85
pubmed: 8777094
Medicine (Baltimore). 2017 Oct;96(42):e8340
pubmed: 29049251
Anesth Analg. 1991 Aug;73(2):157-64
pubmed: 1854030