The influence of partial union on the mechanical strength of scaphoid fractures: a finite element study.
Scaphoid
biomechanics
finite element modelling
fracture union
scaphoid fracture
Journal
The Journal of hand surgery, European volume
ISSN: 2043-6289
Titre abrégé: J Hand Surg Eur Vol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101315820
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
05 2023
05 2023
Historique:
medline:
28
4
2023
pubmed:
24
2
2023
entrez:
23
2
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Assessment of scaphoid fracture union on computed tomography scans is not currently standardized. We investigated the extent of scaphoid waist fracture union required to withstand physiological loads in a finite element model, based on a high-resolution CT scan of a cadaveric forearm. For simulations, the scaphoid waist was partially fused at the radial and ulnar sides. A physiological load of 100 N was transmitted to the scaphoid and the minimal amount of union to maintain biomechanical stability was recorded. The orientation of the fracture plane was varied to analyse the effect on biomechanical stability. The results indicate that the scaphoid is more prone to re-fracture when healing occurs on the ulnar side, where at least 60% union is required. Union occurring from the radial side can withstand loads with as little as 25% union. In fractures more parallel to the radial axis, the scaphoid seems less resistant on the radial side, as at least 50% union is required. A quantitative CT scan analysis with the proposed cut-off values and a consistently applied clinical examination will guide the clinician as to whether mid-waist scaphoid fractures can be considered as truly united.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36814409
doi: 10.1177/17531934231157565
pmc: PMC10150260
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
435-444Références
Bone. 2021 Dec;153:116161
pubmed: 34455117
J Biomech. 1995 May;28(5):587-601
pubmed: 7775494
J Hand Surg Am. 1989 May;14(3):458-65
pubmed: 2738332
Med Eng Phys. 2002 Dec;24(10):641-50
pubmed: 12460723
J Biomech. 2002 Jan;35(1):125-33
pubmed: 11747891
Bone Joint J. 2016 May;98-B(5):654-9
pubmed: 27143737
Med Eng Phys. 2007 Jul;29(6):652-60
pubmed: 17067844
J Hand Surg Am. 2010 Aug;35(8):1246-50
pubmed: 20684923
Ann Biomed Eng. 1984;12(3):247-62
pubmed: 6517405
J Hand Surg Br. 2005 Oct;30(5):440-5
pubmed: 16006021
Med Eng Phys. 2016 Feb;38(2):131-9
pubmed: 26654577
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2008 Feb;23(2):135-46
pubmed: 17931759
J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2011 Jul;36(6):498-502
pubmed: 21467089
Sci Rep. 2016 Oct 31;6:36330
pubmed: 27796345
J Biomech Eng. 2015 Jan;137(1):
pubmed: 25412137
Lancet. 2020 Aug 8;396(10248):390-401
pubmed: 32771106
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2018 Nov;104(7):1107-1113
pubmed: 30179724
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2011 Nov;93(11):1433-9
pubmed: 22058291
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1991 Sep;73(5):828-32
pubmed: 1894676
Bone. 2002 Jun;30(6):842-8
pubmed: 12052451
J Biomech. 1998 Oct;31(10):941-5
pubmed: 9840760
J Hand Surg Am. 2013 May;38(5):872-7
pubmed: 23531510