Remote care in UK general practice: baseline data on 11 case studies [version 2; peer review: 2 approved].
Remote consultations
access
digital inclusion
e-consultations
general practice
telephone consultations
triage
video consultations
Journal
NIHR open research
ISSN: 2633-4402
Titre abrégé: NIHR Open Res
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9918333281906676
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
29 Nov 2022
29 Nov 2022
Historique:
entrez:
23
2
2023
pubmed:
24
2
2023
medline:
24
2
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Accessing and receiving care remotely (by telephone, video or online) became the default option during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, but in-person care has unique benefits in some circumstances. We are studying UK general practices as they try to balance remote and in-person care, with recurrent waves of COVID-19 and various post-pandemic backlogs. Mixed-methods (mostly qualitative) case study across 11 general practices. Researchers-in-residence have built relationships with practices and become familiar with their contexts and activities; they are following their progress for two years via staff and patient interviews, documents and ethnography, and supporting improvement efforts through co-design. In this paper, we report baseline data. Reflecting our maximum-variety sampling strategy, the 11 practices vary in size, setting, ethos, staffing, population demographics and digital maturity, but share common contextual features-notably system-level stressors such as high workload and staff shortages, and UK's technical and regulatory infrastructure. We have identified both commonalities and differences between practices in terms of how they: 1] manage the 'digital front door' (access and triage) and balance demand and capacity; 2] strive for high standards of quality and safety; 3] ensure digital inclusion and mitigate wider inequalities; 4] support and train their staff (clinical and non-clinical), students and trainees; 5] select, install, pilot and use technologies and the digital infrastructure which support them; and 6] involve patients in their improvement efforts. General practices' responses to pandemic-induced disruptive innovation appear unique and situated. We anticipate that by focusing on depth and detail, this longitudinal study will throw light on why a solution that works well in one practice does not work at all in another. As the study unfolds, we will explore how practices achieve timely diagnosis of urgent or serious illness and manage continuity of care, long-term conditions and complex needs.
Sections du résumé
Background
UNASSIGNED
Accessing and receiving care remotely (by telephone, video or online) became the default option during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, but in-person care has unique benefits in some circumstances. We are studying UK general practices as they try to balance remote and in-person care, with recurrent waves of COVID-19 and various post-pandemic backlogs.
Methods
UNASSIGNED
Mixed-methods (mostly qualitative) case study across 11 general practices. Researchers-in-residence have built relationships with practices and become familiar with their contexts and activities; they are following their progress for two years via staff and patient interviews, documents and ethnography, and supporting improvement efforts through co-design. In this paper, we report baseline data.
Results
UNASSIGNED
Reflecting our maximum-variety sampling strategy, the 11 practices vary in size, setting, ethos, staffing, population demographics and digital maturity, but share common contextual features-notably system-level stressors such as high workload and staff shortages, and UK's technical and regulatory infrastructure. We have identified both commonalities and differences between practices in terms of how they: 1] manage the 'digital front door' (access and triage) and balance demand and capacity; 2] strive for high standards of quality and safety; 3] ensure digital inclusion and mitigate wider inequalities; 4] support and train their staff (clinical and non-clinical), students and trainees; 5] select, install, pilot and use technologies and the digital infrastructure which support them; and 6] involve patients in their improvement efforts.
Conclusions
UNASSIGNED
General practices' responses to pandemic-induced disruptive innovation appear unique and situated. We anticipate that by focusing on depth and detail, this longitudinal study will throw light on why a solution that works well in one practice does not work at all in another. As the study unfolds, we will explore how practices achieve timely diagnosis of urgent or serious illness and manage continuity of care, long-term conditions and complex needs.
Identifiants
pubmed: 36814638
doi: 10.3310/nihropenres.13290.2
pmc: PMC7614213
mid: EMS164641
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
47Subventions
Organisme : Department of Health
ID : NIHR132807
Pays : United Kingdom
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Competing interests: No competing interests were disclosed.
Références
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Feb 12;22(1):188
pubmed: 35151302
BMJ Qual Saf. 2014 Oct;23(10):801-5
pubmed: 24894592
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Feb 8;23(2):e26433
pubmed: 33465037
JAMIA Open. 2022 Jan 19;5(1):ooac002
pubmed: 35146380
Br J Gen Pract. 2022 Apr 28;72(718):e351-e360
pubmed: 35256385
BJGP Open. 2021 Oct 26;5(5):
pubmed: 34404634
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Nov 10;24(11):e42431
pubmed: 36282978
Milbank Q. 2004;82(4):581-629
pubmed: 15595944
Front Digit Health. 2021 Aug 13;3:726095
pubmed: 34713199
Res Involv Engagem. 2022 Apr 11;8(1):13
pubmed: 35410450
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2022 Aug 3;22(1):207
pubmed: 35922817
BJGP Open. 2021 Oct 26;5(5):
pubmed: 34257067
Br J Gen Pract. 2019 May;69(682):e321-e328
pubmed: 31015225
Postgrad Med J. 2020 Jun;96(1136):325-330
pubmed: 32144118
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2018 Aug 1;25(8):1080-1088
pubmed: 29788380
Br J Gen Pract. 2022 Jan 27;72(715):e128-e137
pubmed: 34903520
BMJ Qual Saf. 2022 Mar 8;:
pubmed: 35260414
Br J Gen Pract. 2022 Jun 30;72(720):e492-e500
pubmed: 35379604
BMC Health Serv Res. 2010 Dec 29;10:348
pubmed: 21190583
Eur J Gen Pract. 2021 Dec;27(1):241-247
pubmed: 34431426
Pain Rep. 2022 Apr 14;7(3):e1001
pubmed: 35450155
BMC Med Educ. 2022 Feb 19;22(1):108
pubmed: 35183171
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Oct 7;23(10):e31374
pubmed: 34516389
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2017 May 29;7(1):81-85
pubmed: 29325407
J Am Board Fam Med. 2022 May-Jun;35(3):507-516
pubmed: 35641038
J Telemed Telecare. 2022 Jul 14;:1357633X221113711
pubmed: 35833345
Br J Gen Pract. 2022 Apr 28;72(718):206-207
pubmed: 35483943
JMIR Aging. 2022 Mar 22;5(1):e35221
pubmed: 35134746
Br J Gen Pract. 2021 Feb 25;71(704):e166-e177
pubmed: 33558332
Clin Pediatr (Phila). 2022 Jan;61(1):26-33
pubmed: 34514898
J Psychiatr Res. 2022 Dec;156:668-678
pubmed: 36399859
Rheumatol Int. 2022 Jun;42(6):999-1007
pubmed: 35403853
Front Digit Health. 2021 Dec 20;3:754319
pubmed: 34988546
NIHR Open Res. 2022 Nov 29;2:47
pubmed: 36814638