Cost-effectiveness of a multicomponent quality improvement care model for diabetes in South Asia: The CARRS randomized clinical trial.
South Asia
cost-effectiveness
diabetes
quality improvement
Journal
Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association
ISSN: 1464-5491
Titre abrégé: Diabet Med
Pays: England
ID NLM: 8500858
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
09 2023
09 2023
Historique:
revised:
31
01
2023
received:
12
09
2022
accepted:
16
02
2023
medline:
17
8
2023
pubmed:
24
2
2023
entrez:
23
2
2023
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To assess the cost-effectiveness of a multicomponent strategy versus usual care in people with type 2 diabetes in South Asia. Economic evaluation from healthcare system and societal perspectives. Ten diverse urban clinics in India and Pakistan. 1146 people with type 2 diabetes (575 in the intervention group and 571 in the usual care group) with mean age of 54.2 years, median diabetes duration: 7 years and mean HbA1c: 9.9% (85 mmol/mol) at baseline. Multicomponent strategy comprising decision-supported electronic health records and non-physician care coordinator. Control group received usual care. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) per unit achievement in multiple risk factor control (HbA1c <7% (53 mmol/mol) and SBP <130/80 mmHg or LDLc <2.58 mmol/L (100 mg/dL)), ICERs per unit reduction in HbA1c, 5-mmHg unit reductions in systolic BP, 10-unit reductions in LDLc (mg/dl) (considered as clinically relevant) and ICER per quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) gained. ICERs were reported in 2020 purchasing power parity-adjusted international dollars (INT$). The probability of ICERs being cost-effective was considered depending on the willingness to pay (WTP) values as a share of GDP per capita for India (Int$ 7041.4) and Pakistan (Int$ 4847.6). Compared to usual care, the annual incremental costs per person for intervention group were Int$ 1061.9 from a health system perspective and Int$ 1093.6 from a societal perspective. The ICER was Int$ 10,874.6 per increase in multiple risk factor control, $2588.1 per one percentage point reduction in the HbA1c, and $1744.6 per 5 unit reduction in SBP (mmHg), and $1271 per 10 unit reduction in LDLc (mg/dl). The ICER per QALY gained was $33,399.6 from a societal perspective. In a trial setting in South Asia, a multicomponent strategy for diabetes care resulted in better multiple risk factor control at higher costs and may be cost-effective depending on the willingness to pay threshold with substantial uncertainty around cost-effectiveness for QALYs gained in the short term (2.5 years). Future research needs to confirm the long-term cost-effectiveness of intensive multifactorial intervention for diabetes care in diverse healthcare settings in LMICs.
Substances chimiques
Glycated Hemoglobin
0
Types de publication
Randomized Controlled Trial
Journal Article
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e15074Subventions
Organisme : FIC NIH HHS
ID : K43 TW011164
Pays : United States
Organisme : NHLBI NIH HHS
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIH HHS
ID : 5R24TW007988
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIMH NIH HHS
ID : R01MH100390-04S1
Pays : United States
Organisme : NHLBI NIH HHS
ID : HHSN268200900026C
Pays : United States
Informations de copyright
© 2023 The Authors. Diabetic Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Diabetes UK.
Références
International Diabetes Federation: IDF Diabetes Atlas - 9th Edition. Accessed March 3, 2021. https://www.diabetesatlas.org/en/
Hills AP, Misra A, Gill JMR, et al. Public health and health systems: implications for the prevention and management of type 2 diabetes in South Asia. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2018;6(12):992-1002.
Hills AP, Arena R, Khunti K, et al. Epidemiology and determinants of type 2 diabetes in South Asia. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2018;6(12):966-978.
Anjana RM, Deepa M, Subashini R, et al. Temporal changes in diabetes prevalence and achievement of care goals in urban South Asia from 2010 to 2016-the Center for Cardio-metabolic Risk Reduction in South Asia Study. Diabet Med. 2021;38(2):e14424.
Singh K, Narayan KMV, Eggleston K. Economic impact of diabetes in South Asia: the magnitude of the problem. Curr Diab Rep. 2019;19(6):34.
Masood MQ, Singh K, Kondal D, et al. Factors affecting achievement of glycemic targets among type 2 diabetes patients in South Asia: analysis of the CARRS trial. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2021;171:108555.
Ali MK, Siegel KR, Chandrasekar E, et al. Diabetes: an update on the pandemic and potential solutions. In: Prabhakaran D, Anand S, GazianoT., MbanyaJ., WuY., NugentR., eds. Cardiovascular, respiratory, and related disorders. Vol 5. 3rd ed. World Bank; 2017.
Siegel KR, Ali MK, Zhou X, et al. Cost-effectiveness of interventions to manage diabetes: has the evidence changed since 2008? Diabetes Care. 2020;43(7):1557-1592.
Ali MK, Singh K, Kondal D, et al. Effectiveness of a multicomponent quality improvement strategy to improve achievement of diabetes care goals: a randomized, controlled trial. Ann Intern Med. 2016;165(6):399-408.
Group CTW, Shah S, Singh K, et al. Improving diabetes care: multi-component cardiovascular disease risk reduction strategies for people with diabetes in South Asia-the CARRS multi-center translation trial. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2012;98(2):285-294.
Deepa M, Grace M, Binukumar B, et al. High burden of prediabetes and diabetes in three large cities in South Asia: the Center for cArdio-metabolic Risk Reduction in South Asia (CARRS) Study. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2015;110(2):172-182.
Singh K, Ali MK, Devarajan R, et al. Rationale and protocol for estimating the economic value of a multicomponent quality improvement strategy for diabetes care in South Asia. Glob Health Res Policy. 2019;4:7.
World Health Organization. Making choices in health: WHO guide to cost-effectiveness analysis. World Health Organization; 2003 Accessed November 02, 2021. https://www.who.int/choice/publications/p_2003_generalised_cea.pdf. In: Edejer TT-T, ed
Husereau D, Drummond M, Augustovski F, et al. Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards 2022 (CHEERS 2022) statement: updated reporting guidance for health economic evaluations. BMJ. 2022;376:e067975.
Sanders GD, Neumann PJ, Basu A, et al. Recommendations for conduct, methodological practices, and reporting of cost-effectiveness analyses: second panel on cost-effectiveness in health and medicine. Jama. 2016;316(10):1093-1103.
The World Band Data. Inflation, consumer prices (annual %) - India, Pakistan. Accessed December 27, 2020. https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/FP.CPI.TOTL.ZG?locations=IN-PK
Inflation tool. Inflation calculator-India Rupee. Accessed May 25, 2021. https://www.inflationtool.com/indian-rupee#:~:text=The%20inflation%20rate%20in%20India,1958%20equals%20%248%2C416.47%20in%202021
OECD Data Purchasing Power Parities (PPP) and Exchange Rates; 2020. Accessed December 27, 2020. https://data.oecd.org/conversion/purchasing-power-parities-ppp.htm
European Quality of Life 5 Dimension: 3 Level (EQ5D-3L). Accessed January 20, 2023. https://euroqol.org/eq-5d-instruments/eq-5d-3l-about/
Horsman J, Furlong W, Feeny D, Torrance G. The Health Utilities Index (HUI): concepts, measurement properties and applications. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2003;1:54.
Marseille E, Larson B, Kazi DS, Kahn JG, Rosen S. Thresholds for the cost-effectiveness of interventions: alternative approaches. Bull World Health Organ. 2015;93(2):118-124.
GDP per capita of India. IMF World Economic Outlook. 2020 Accessed December 27, 2020. https://www.imf.org/en/Publications/WEO/weo-database/2020/October/weo-report?c=534,&s=NGDPDPC,PPPPC,&sy=2020
Little RJA. A test of missing completely at random for multivariate data with missing values. J Am Stat Assoc. 1988;83:1198-1202.
Gaede P, Valentine WJ, Palmer AJ, et al. Cost-effectiveness of intensified versus conventional multifactorial intervention in type 2 diabetes: results and projections from the Steno-2 study. Diabetes Care. 2008;31(8):1510-1515.
Laxy M, Wilson ECF, Boothby CE, Griffin SJ. Incremental costs and cost effectiveness of intensive treatment in individuals with type 2 diabetes detected by screening in the ADDITION-UK trial: an update with empirical trial-based cost data. Value Health. 2017;20(10):1288-1298.
Nuckols TK, Keeler E, Anderson LJ, et al. Economic evaluation of quality improvement interventions designed to improve glycemic control in diabetes: a systematic review and weighted regression analysis. Diabetes Care. 2018;41(5):985-993.
Richardson J, Khan MA, Iezzi A, Maxwell A. Comparing and explaining differences in the magnitude, content, and sensitivity of utilities predicted by the EQ-5D, SF-6D, HUI 3, 15D, QWB, and AQoL-8D multiattribute utility instruments. Med Decis Making. 2015;35(3):276-291.
Emmert-Fees KMF, Laxy M, Patel SA, et al. Cost-effectiveness of a collaborative care model among patients with type 2 diabetes and depression in India. Diabetes Care. 2023;46(1):11-19.
Gaede J, Oellgaard J, Ibsen R, et al. A cost analysis of intensified vs conventional multifactorial therapy in individuals with type 2 diabetes: a post hoc analysis of the Steno-2 study. Diabetologia. 2019;62(1):147-155.